Ten facet scales for the Big Five Inventory: Convergence with NEO PI-R facets, self-peer agreement, and discriminant validity
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Anxiety is by far the most prevalent negative affect among those in Neuroticism.
“Of those, anxiety is by far the most prevalent (Noller, Law, & Comrey, 1987;Soto & John, 2009).”
From Cultural norm fulfillment, interpersonal belonging, or getting ahead? A large-scale cross-cultural test of three perspectives on the function of self-esteem. (2015) · cites this paper as Soto & John, 2009
Cites
Benet-Martínez, V., & John, O. P. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.75.3.729 · Cited by 1,996 · see citing works
Self-citationROBERTS, B. W., CHERNYSHENKO, O. S., STARK, S., & GOLDBERG, L. R. (2005) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00301.x · Cited by 786 · see citing works
Hierarchical subcomponents of the Big Five personality factors: A cross-language replication.
Saucier, G., & Ostendorf, F. (1999) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.613 · Cited by 338 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…mix or blend the domains (e.g., Hofstee, de Raad, & Goldberg, 1992), and factor-analyzing sets of trait adjectives, questionnaire items, or scales within each domain (e.g., DeYoung, Quilty, & Peterson, 2007; Roberts, Chernyshenko, Stark, & Goldberg, 2005; Saucier, 1994; Saucier & Ostendorf, 1999).”
MethodReplicable Item-Cluster Subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory
Saucier, G. (1998) · Journal of Personality Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa7002_6 · Cited by 188 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, Hofstee, de Raad, & Goldberg, 1992), and factor-analyzing sets of trait adjectives, questionnaire items, or scales within each domain (e.g., DeYoung, Quilty, & Peterson, 2007; Roberts, Chernyshenko, Stark, & Goldberg, 2005; Saucier, 1994; Saucier & Ostendorf, 1999).”
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Processes of Personality Development in Adulthood: The TESSERA Framework
Wrzus, C., & Roberts, B. W. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868316652279 · Cited by 559 · see citing works
Challenges to capture the big five personality traits in non-WEIRD populations
Laajaj, R., Macours, K., Pinzon Hernandez, D. A., Arias, O., Gosling, S. D., Potter, J., Rubio-Codina, M., & Vakis, R. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaw5226 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Qualter, P., Gardner, K. J., Pope, D. J., Hutchinson, J. M., & Whiteley, H. E. (2012) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.007 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Personality and self-insight in individuals with autism spectrum disorder.
Schriber, R. A., Robins, R. W., & Solomon, M. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034950 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Obschonka, M., Stuetzer, M., Rentfrow, P. J., Shaw-Taylor, L., Satchell, M., Silbereisen, R. K., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2018) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000175 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Gebauer, J. E., Sedikides, C., Wagner, J., Bleidorn, W., Rentfrow, P. J., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000052 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Jerant, A., Griffin, E., Rainwater, J., Henderson, M., Sousa, F., Bertakis, K. D., Fenton, J. J., & Franks, P. (2012) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31826102ad · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Big five model and trait emotional intelligence in camouflaging behaviours in autism
Robinson, E., Hull, L., & Petrides, K. V. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2019.109565 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Application of Generalizability Theory to the Big Five Inventory
Arterberry, B. J., Martens, M. P., Cadigan, J. M., & Rohrer, D. (2014) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.05.015 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Obschonka, M., Stuetzer, M., Rentfrow, P. J., Lee, N., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2018) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550618755874 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Bergeron, P., Pagé, A., & Trempe, M. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248876 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Soto, C. J., & John, O. P.
- Affiliations
- Colby College (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Corresponding author
- Soto, Christopher J.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Personality
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 84-90
- ISSN
- 0092-6566 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2138584880
- Cited by
- 393
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 16
- FWCI
- 6.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Research in Personality (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- Big Five personality traits, personality facets, Big Five Inventory, NEO-PI-R, self-report, peer reporting, discriminant validity, scale development, personality assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
