Cited by 72Treatment of Major DepressionElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesTryptophan and brain disorders

Esketamine: new hope for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression? A narrative review

Open access
Salahudeen, Mohammed S, Wright, Cameron M, Peterson, Gregory M·2020·Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety

Abstract

This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the current literature on the pharmacology, safety, efficacy and tolerability of intranasal esketamine, the S-enantiomer of ketamine, for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). A literature search using Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central was conducted (January 2000 to July 2019). Product information and www.clinicaltrials.gov were also reviewed. The literature search was limited to human studies published in English. Phase I, II, and III studies of intranasal esketamine for TRD were reviewed. About a third of patients with major depressive disorder fail to achieve remission despite treatment with multiple antidepressants. This article examines the trials that led to the approval of esketamine in the United States, as well as other recent studies of esketamine for TRD. The findings from limited phase III trials illustrate that intranasal esketamine is effective and safe in reducing depressive symptoms and achieving clinical response in patients with TRD. The optimum duration and frequency of use are not fully understood. Although the nasal spray is a convenient dosage form, its use in practice may be limited by cost and administrative regulation. While it may prove beneficial to many patients who suffer from TRD, further long-term data are required, along with comparative trials with the R-isomer (arketamine). In the interim, care and monitoring should be exercised in its use in clinical practice. Plain language summary: Esketamine: new therapy for severe depression Intranasal esketamine, the S-enantiomer of ketamine, was recently approved in the United States for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression (TRD). The findings from limited clinical trials indicate that intranasal esketamine is effective and safe in patients with TRD, although the optimum dose, duration and frequency of use are not fully understood. Its use in practice may be limited by cost and administrative regulation, and further long-term data are required.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2042098620937899

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [56]Popova V Daly E Trivedi M, et al S111. Randomized, double-blind study of flexibly-dosed intranasal esketamine plus oral antidepressant vs. active control in treatment-resistant depression. Biol Psychiatry 2018; 83: S390.
  2. [79]Institute for Clinical and Economic Review. Esketamine for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression: effectiveness and value. Evidence report prepared for Midwest CEPAC in May 2019. https://icer-review.org/material/trd-evidence-report/ (2019, accessed 6 May 2020).
  3. [88]Tibensky BN de Leseleuc L Perras C, et al Esketamine for treatment-resistant depression. CADTH Issues in Emerging Health Technologies. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health Copyright (c) CADTH 2019, 2019, pp. 1– 17. 31211546

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salahudeen, M. S., Wright, C. M., & Peterson, G. M.
Affiliations
University of Tasmania (AU)
Corresponding author
Peterson, Gregory M
Venue
Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety
Published
2020-01
Volume
11
Pages
2042098620937899-2042098620937899
ISSN
  • 2042-0986 (ISSN-L)
  • 2042-0994
OpenAlex
W3044729970
Cited by
72
References
80
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UTAS Research Repository (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Biological Psychiatry › Tryptophan and brain disorders
Keywords
esketamine, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, intranasal administration, ketamine enantiomers, drug safety, drug efficacy, tolerability, drug approval, dose optimization, long-term outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review