Esketamine Nasal Spray Plus Oral Antidepressant in Patients With Treatment-Resistant Depression
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term safety and efficacy of esketamine nasal spray plus a new oral antidepressant (OAD) in patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). METHODS: This phase 3, open-label, multicenter, long-term (up to 1 year) study was conducted between October 2015 and October 2017. Patients (≥ 18 years) with TRD (DSM-5 diagnosis of major depressive disorder and nonresponse to ≥ 2 OAD treatments) were enrolled directly or transferred from a short-term study (patients aged ≥ 65 years). Esketamine nasal spray (28-mg, 56-mg, or 84-mg) plus new OAD was administered twice a week in a 4-week induction (IND) phase and weekly or every-other-week for patients who were responders and entered a 48-week optimization/maintenance (OP/MAINT) phase. RESULTS: Of 802 enrolled patients, 86.2% were direct-entry and 13.8% were transferred-entry; 580 (74.5%) of 779 patients who entered the IND phase completed the phase, and 150 (24.9%) of 603 who entered the OP/MAINT phase completed the phase. Common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dizziness (32.9%), dissociation (27.6%), nausea (25.1%), and headache (24.9%). Seventy-six patients (9.5%) discontinued esketamine due to TEAEs. Fifty-five patients (6.9%) experienced serious TEAEs. Most TEAEs occurred on dosing days, were mild or moderate in severity, and resolved on the same day. Two deaths were reported; neither was considered related to esketamine. Cognitive performance generally either improved or remained stable postbaseline. There was no case of interstitial cystitis or respiratory depression. Treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms were transient and generally resolved within 1.5 hours postdose. Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score decreased during the IND phase, and this reduction persisted during the OP/MAINT phase (mean [SD] change from baseline of respective phase to endpoint: IND, -16.4 [8.76]; OP/MAINT, 0.3 [8.12]). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term esketamine nasal spray plus new OAD therapy had a manageable safety profile, and improvements in depression appeared to be sustained in patients with TRD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02497287.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
3 of 19 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Study design and conductcitation
Alternate forms were used for all cognitive tests to attenuate practice effects.
“Finally, alternate forms (HVLT-R: Forms 1-6; Cogstate: playing-cards-based tests [DET, IDN, OCL, and ONB tasks] and 18 parallel maze forms for the GMLT) were used for all cognitive tests to attenuate practice effects.36”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [36] 36. Goldberg TE, Harvey PD, Wesnes KA, et al. Practice effects due to serial cognitive assessment: Implications for preclinical Alzheimer's disease randomized controlled trials. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2015;1(1):103-111. 36. P u b M e d source
- Findingcitation
The incidence of urinary tract infection in this study (8.1%) was analogous to rates in a general adult female population (over 10%) over 1 year.
“The incidence of UTI (8.1%) in the present study was analogous to rates observed in a general adult female population (over 10%) over a 1-year period.31”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [31] 31. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 30. Rowe TA, Juthani-Mehta M. Urinary tract infection in older adults. Aging Health. 2013;9(5):ahe.13.38. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 31. Foxman B, Barlow R, D'Arcy H, et al. Urinary tract infection: self-reported incidence and associated costs. Ann Epidemiol. 2000;10(8):509-515. source
The 'Urinary tract infection' subsection reports that over 10% of women older than 65 had a UTI in the past 12 months. It does not give that rate for the general adult female population. The 8.1% figure is identified as the citing authors' own finding, not a result attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
Among patients who discontinued during the OP/MAINT phase, fatigue-lethargy/lack of energy was the most common new or worsening withdrawal symptom at week 1, reported by 25.0%.
“In patients who discontinued from the OP/MAINT phase, the most common (> 20%) new or worsening”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Cognitive performance generally improved or stayed stable after baseline.
“Cognitive performance generally either improved or remained stable postbaseline.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, preservation or improvement in all clinically significant cognitive domains on the Cogstate and HLVT-R was observed, except in patients aged ≥65 years who had slowing on simple (DET) and choice reaction-time (IDN) tests.
“In the present study, preservation or improvement in all clinically significant cognitive domains on the Cogstate and HLVT-R was observed, except in patients aged ≥ 65 years, who had slowing of performance only on simple (DET) and choice reaction-time (IDN) tests of the Cogstate.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
There was no significant change in the more complex cognitive domains (verbal, visual, working memory, and executive function).
“In addition, there was no significant change in the more complex cognitive domains (verbal, visual, working memory, and executive function), suggesting that the slowing in reaction times may be an isolated observation, not implicating attentional deficit.35”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms were transient and usually resolved within 1.5 hours after dosing.
“Treatment-emergent dissociative symptoms were transient and generally resolved within 1.5 hours postdose.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
9.5% (76/802) of patients stopped esketamine because of treatment-emergent adverse events.
“Seventysix patients (9.5%) had TEAEs that led to discontinuation of esketamine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, 14.5% of patients who did not have suicidal ideation at baseline reported new suicidal ideation.
“In the present study, 14.5% of patients who did not have suicidal ideation at baseline reported new suicidal ideation, 6 patients (0.7%) attempted suicide (1.571 per 100 patient years), and 1 patient completed suicide (0.262 per 100 patient years).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In responders who continued treatment for up to 1 year, mean change in MADRS total score from OP/MAINT baseline to endpoint was 0.3 (SD 8.12).
“The improvement in MADRS total score appeared to be sustained in patients who were responders (direct and transfer entry) and who continued treatment for up to 1 year of exposure (mean [SD] change from OP/ MAINT baseline to endpoint: 0.3 [8.12])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of clinically relevant esketamine-related treatment-emergent adverse events were transient and resolved on the day of administration.
“The majority of clinically-relevant esketamine-related TEAEs in this study were transient and resolved on the day of administration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The majority of treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate in severity.
“The majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity, and the incidence of serious TEAEs was low.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The two deaths reported during the study were not attributed to esketamine by the study site investigator.
“Two deaths reported during the study were not attributed to esketamine as judged by the study site investigator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Most patients with serious treatment-emergent adverse events either recovered or were recovering at study closure.
“Most patients with serious TEAEs either recovered or were recovering at study closure.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Serious treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 6.9% (55/802) of patients.
“Serious TEAEs were reported in 55/802 patients (6.9%)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among patients who discontinued during the OP/MAINT phase, insomnia was the most common new or worsening withdrawal symptom at endpoint, reported by 22.7%.
“and at endpoint was insomnia (22.7%) (Supplementary Table 5).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No case of interstitial or ulcerative cystitis was reported.
“No case of interstitial/ ulcerative cystitis was reported, and TEAEs of cystitis were mostly of mild severity, transient and self-limiting, and considered to be suggestive of an infectious etiology (ie, UTI).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The incidence of serious treatment-emergent adverse events was low.
“The majority of TEAEs were mild or moderate in severity, and the incidence of serious TEAEs was low.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the IND phase, the percentage of responders and remitters increased over time, reaching 78.4% responders and 47.2% remitters (MADRS ≤12) at endpoint.
“In the IND phase, the percentage of responders and remitters increased over time, with 78.4% responders and 47.2% remitters (MADRS ≤ 12) at endpoint.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In this study, 1 patient completed suicide, corresponding to 0.262 per 100 patient years.
“In the present study, 14.5% of patients who did not have suicidal ideation at baseline reported new suicidal ideation, 6 patients (0.7%) attempted suicide (1.571 per 100 patient years), and 1 patient completed suicide (0.262 per 100 patient years).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 90.1% (723/802) of patients.
“TEAEs were reported in 723/802 patients (90.1%;Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Reduction in dosing frequency from weekly to every-other-week was achieved in 38.1% of patients.
“In addition, reduction in dosing frequency from weekly to every-other-week regimens was consistently achieved in a considerable proportion (38.1%) of patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Consistent with rapid plasma clearance, dissociative symptoms and dizziness were transient and mostly resolved within 1.5 hours after dosing.
“Consistent with the rapid plasma clearance, dissociative symptoms and dizziness were transient and mostly resolved within 1.5 hours after dosing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Esketamine's rapid plasma clearance, short half-life, and low dosing frequency prevent steady-state accumulation in patients.
- Findingnone given
In this study, there was no indication of abuse of esketamine.
“In this study, there was no indication of abuse of esketamine, and the duration of TEAEs of dizziness, dissociation, and somnolence was generally limited to the day of esketamine administration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the IND phase, mean MADRS total score decreased from baseline to endpoint by 16.4 points (SD 8.76; n=756).
“The mean MADRS total score decreased in the IND phase (mean [SD] change from IND baseline to endpoint: -16.4 [8.76], n = 756).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At the end of the OP/MAINT phase, remission rate was 58.2% using MADRS ≤12 and 49.8% using MADRS ≤10.
“Remission rate observed in this treatment-resistant population at end of the OP/MAINT phase was 58.2% using MADRS ≤ 12 criteria and 49.8% using MADRS ≤ 10 cutoff.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
The duration of treatment-emergent adverse events of dizziness, dissociation, and somnolence was generally limited to the day of esketamine administration.
“In this study, there was no indication of abuse of esketamine, and the duration of TEAEs of dizziness, dissociation, and somnolence was generally limited to the day of esketamine administration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Of the 55 serious treatment-emergent adverse events, 5 were assessed by the investigator as related to esketamine: suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, anxiety and delusions (both in one patient), and delirium.
“Of the 55 serious TEAEs, 5 events were assessed as related to the treatment with esketamine by the investigator: [suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, anxiety and delusions (both in 1 patient) and delirium].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the mixed-effects model for repeated measures of maximum post-dose CADSS total score, the visit effect was statistically significant (two-sided p < 0.001).
“The visit effect in the MMRM was statistically significant (two-sided p < 0.001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The other death was a 55-year-old woman who died by suicide on study day 188 (last esketamine dose day 176), during what was reported as her first depressive episode.
“The other patient, a 55-yearold woman, died due to suicide on day 188 of the study (last dose of esketamine: day 176) during her first depressive episode as reported.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
One patient discontinued treatment because of the treatment-emergent adverse event of ventricular arrhythmia with ventricular extrasystolia on ECG.
“One patient discontinued from the treatment due to the TEAE of ventricular arrhythmia with ventricular extrasystolia in the ECG.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The slowing in reaction times may be an isolated observation, not implicating attentional deficit.
“In addition, there was no significant change in the more complex cognitive domains (verbal, visual, working memory, and executive function), suggesting that the slowing in reaction times may be an isolated observation, not implicating attentional deficit.35”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [35] 35. Bruce KM, Robinson SR, Smith JA, et al. Validity of a screening tool for detecting subtle cognitive impairment in the middle-aged and elderly. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:2165-2176. 35. P u b M e d
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
This study is one of the first to demonstrate long-term (up to 1 year) safety and tolerability of weekly or every-other-week esketamine nasal spray plus a new oral antidepressant.
“The present study is one of the first to demonstrate the long-term (up to 1 year) safety and tolerability of weekly or every-other-week treatment with esketamine nasal spray plus a new OAD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Previously, only one small study (n=54) showed manageable tolerability and low discontinuation due to adverse events with long-term (up to 29 months) intravenous ketamine in patients with severe treatment-resistant mood disorders.
“Previously, only 1 study 28 with a small sample size (n = 54) showed manageable tolerability and low discontinuation rate due to adverse events with longterm (up to 29 months) intravenous ketamine treatment in patients with severe, treatment-resistant mood disorders.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] 28. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 26. Guy W. CGI Clinical Global Impressions. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1976:217-222.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Premisecitation
The same MADRS ≤12 definition has been used previously in clinical studies of MDD patients selected irrespective of prior treatment response.
“Nevertheless, the same definition has also been used previously in clinical studies 20,21 of patients with MDD who were selected irrespective of response to previous treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [20] 20. Humphrey L, Arbuckle R, Moldwin R, et al. The bladder pain/interstitial cystitis symptom score: development, validation, and identification of a cut score. Eur Urol. 2012;61(2):271-279. source
- cites [21] 21. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 19. Rickels K, Garcia-Espana F, Mandos LA, et al. Physician Withdrawal Checklist (PWC-20). J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2008;28(4):447-451. source
- Interpretationown data
Depressive symptoms appeared to remain improved over long-term treatment with esketamine plus oral antidepressant in treatment-resistant depression.
“Long-term esketamine nasal spray plus new OAD therapy had a manageable safety profile, and improvements in depression appeared to be sustained in patients with TRD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
High response and remission rates suggest that long-term (up to 1 year) esketamine treatment appears to provide sustained symptom improvement.
“This study had several limitations including its openlabel study design, the simultaneous initiation of a new OAD, and the absence of a control group; however, the high response and remission rates suggest that long-term (up to 1 year) esketamine treatment appears to provide sustained symptom improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
In patients with treatment-resistant depression, extended use of esketamine nasal spray with a new oral antidepressant had a safety profile that was manageable.
“Long-term esketamine nasal spray plus new OAD therapy had a manageable safety profile, and improvements in depression appeared to be sustained in patients with TRD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The open-label design did not materially affect the safety findings.
- Interpretationcitation
The nature of treatment-emergent adverse events in this study was consistent with the known safety profile of esketamine from placebo-controlled short-term studies in patients with TRD.
“Overall, the nature of TEAEs reported in this study was consistent with the known safety profile of esketamine reported in placebo-controlled, short-term studies [1][2][3][4][5]10 of patients with TRD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1][2][3][4][5]10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Interpretationown data
Improvement in MADRS total score appeared to be sustained in responders who continued treatment for up to 1 year.
“The improvement in MADRS total score appeared to be sustained in patients who were responders (direct and transfer entry) and who continued treatment for up to 1 year of exposure (mean [SD] change from OP/ MAINT baseline to endpoint: 0.3 [8.12])”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Interpretation of the ≥65 cognitive effect was limited by substantial intraindividual variability, lack of a control group, small sample size, and absence of impaired reaction times at other timepoints.
“The interpretation of this effect was limited by the substantial intraindividual variability in reaction time among patients ≥ 65 years across successive study visits, the lack of a control group, small sample size, and the absence of impaired reaction times on day 28 of the IND phase, at the OP/MAINT phase endpoint, and at follow-up.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
It cannot be known whether practice effects occurred that might have obscured some decline in cognitive performance.
“Nonetheless, it cannot be known whether practice effects occurred that might have obscured some decline in cognitive performance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
In this study, improvements in patient-reported depressive symptoms (PHQ-9), functionality, and associated disability (SDS) appear to further support the long-term efficacy of esketamine.
“In this study, improvements in patient-reported measures of depressive symptoms (PHQ-9; Supplementary Table 6), functionality, and associated disability (SDS; Supplementary Table 7) appear to further support the long-term efficacy of esketamine.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
Exclusion of patients with clinically relevant psychiatric or medical comorbidities or substance dependence may limit the generalizability of study findings.
“Exclusion of patients with clinically relevant psychiatric or medical comorbidities or substance dependence may potentially limit the generalizability of study findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The adverse event profile of weekly or every-other-week esketamine was consistent with findings from earlier short-term studies.
“The adverse event profile of weekly or every-other-week dosing of esketamine was consistent with findings from earlier short-term studies.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
To standardize treatment conditions and reduce variability, the four oral antidepressants used were among commonly available standard-of-care treatments in the participating countries.
“To standardize treatment conditions and reduce variability, the 4 OADs used in this study were among the commonly available standard-of-care treatments in the participating countries.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The mean SDS changes during the induction phase suggested improvements in functionality that appeared to be sustained through the optimization/maintenance phase.
“The mean (SD) changes in SDS scores through the IND phase were also suggestive of improvements in functionality that appeared to be sustained through the OP/MAINT”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
“Supplementary table 7 also showed a similar trend of increase through the IND phase that was maintained in the OP/MAINT phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Additional information · hedged
- Interpretationown data
In summary, esketamine nasal spray plus a new oral antidepressant demonstrated favorable long-term safety and manageable tolerability in up to 1 year of intermittent treatment in patients with TRD.
“In summary, esketamine nasal spray plus a new OAD demonstrated favorable long-term safety and manageable tolerability in long-term (up to 1 year) intermittent treatment in patients with TRD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- May combine two claims. 35
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 9
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataHigh retention rates (75% from IND entered OP/MAINT) and attainment of adequate exposure requirements add to the comprehensiveness of the data.
“Furthermore, the high retention rates (75% of patients from the IND phase entered the OP/MAINT phase) and attainment of adequate exposure requirements (as outlined in the International Council for Harmonisation [ICH] E1 guideline) 40 adds to the comprehensiveness of the data collected during this longitudinal study.41,42”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked- cites [40] 40. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 40. ICH Harmonised tripartite guideline-The Extent Of Population Exposure To Assess Clinical Safety For Drugs Intended For Long-Term Treatment Of Non-Life-Threatening Conditions E1. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; 1994.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- cites [41] 41. Abshire M, Dinglas VD, Cajita MI, et al. Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):30. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f source
The Background (page unavailable) says participant retention is vital to the power and internal validity of longitudinal research, supporting the general point that retention strengthens the data. The Results (page unavailable) concern studies with at least 80% retention; this paper does not establish the citing study’s 75% transition from IND to OP/MAINT or its exposure requirements. The ICH guideline is cited separately as reference 40. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [42] 42. Simmonds B, Turner N, Thomas L, et al. Patients' experiences of participating in a large-scale trial of cognitive behavioural therapy for depression: a mixed methods study. Fam Pract. 2013;30(6):705-711. 42. P u M e d C r o s s R e f See supplementary material for this article at . source
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataMADRS total score fell during induction, and the reduction persisted during optimization/maintenance (mean [SD] change: IND, -16.4 [8.76]; OP/MAINT, 0.3 [8.12]).
“Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale total score decreased during the IND phase, and this reduction persisted during the OP/MAINT phase (mean [SD] change from baseline of respective phase to endpoint: IND, -16.4 [8.76]; OP/MAINT, 0.3 [8.12]).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataThe most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events were dizziness (32.9%), dissociation (27.6%), nausea (25.1%), and headache (24.9%).
“Dizziness (32.9%), dissociation (27.6%), nausea (25.1%), and headache (24.9%) were reported frequently (≥ 20% patients) during the IND and OP/MAINT phases”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMean PWC-20 total scores were 8.0 (SD 7.61) at end of treatment and remained similar during follow-up at 7.9 (6.91) at week 1, 8.0 (7.42) at week 2, and 7.7 (7.07) at week 4.
“The mean (SD) PWC-20 total scores (range 0-60; 0-3-point scale [not present = 0, mild = 1, moderate = 2, severe = 3]) were 8.0 (7.61) (at end of treatment) and 7.9 (6.91) (week 1), 8.0 (7.42) (week 2), and 7.7 (7.07) (week 4) during follow-up.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMost esketamine-related treatment-emergent adverse events were mild or moderate, began soon after dosing, and resolved the same day.
“Most esketamine-related TEAEs were mild or moderate in intensity, occurred shortly after esketamine nasal spray administration, and resolved the same day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataOf 802 enrolled patients, 86.2% entered directly and 13.8% were transferred from a short-term study.
“Of 802 enrolled patients, 86.2% were direct-entry and 13.8% were transferred-entry”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTreatment-emergent adverse events of cystitis were mostly mild, transient, self-limiting, and considered suggestive of an infectious etiology (UTI).
“No case of interstitial/ ulcerative cystitis was reported, and TEAEs of cystitis were mostly of mild severity, transient and self-limiting, and considered to be suggestive of an infectious etiology (ie, UTI).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataTwo deaths occurred, and neither was judged related to esketamine.
“Two deaths, assessed as doubtful or unrelated to esketamine by the investigator, were reported”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
FindingcitationThis study involved difficult-to-treat patients with a long-term history of TRD, moderate to severe depression at baseline, a mean current episode duration of about 3 years, and about a quarter with prior suicidal ideation.
“This study involved difficult-to-treat patients with a long-term history of TRD, moderate to severe depression at baseline, and a mean duration of the current depressive episode of about 3 years, and approximately a quarter of the sample had a prior history of suicidal ideation.39”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [39] 39. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 39. Al-Harbi KS. Treatment-resistant depression: therapeutic trends, challenges, and future directions. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:369-388.
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationMean PWC-20 total score 2 weeks after discontinuation (8.0 [7.42]) was similar to end of treatment (8.0 [7.61]) and approximately 2-3 times lower than scores after successful (17.2 [11.6]) and unsuccessful (24.6 [12.6]) benzodiazepine tapering.
“The mean (SD) PWC-20 total score 2 weeks after discontinuation of esketamine (8.0 [7.42]) was similar to that observed at end of treatment (8.0 [7.61]) and was approximately 2-to 3-times lower than the total scores reported in patients after successful (17.2 [11.6]) and unsuccessful (24.6 [12.6]) tapering-off of their benzodiazepines.19”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [19] 19. P u b M e d
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
FindingcitationSimilar to earlier reports, the severity of dissociative symptoms in this study attenuated over time in most cases, although rare transient reemergence of higher intensity dissociative symptoms at a later dosing session was observed.
“Similar to that in earlier reports of esketamine, [1][2][3][4][5]10 severity of dissociative symptoms in this study attenuated over time in most cases, although in rare instances transient reemergence of higher intensity dissociative symptoms at a later dosing session was observed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1][2][3][4][5]10
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataCompletion rates were 74.5% (580/779) in the induction phase and 24.9% (150/603) in the optimization/maintenance phase.
“580 (74.5%) of 779 patients who entered the IND phase completed the phase, and 150 (24.9%) of 603 who entered the OP/MAINT phase completed the phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone givenSerious treatment-emergent adverse events related to renal and urinary tract disorders were assessed as not related to esketamine and resolved while treatment was ongoing.
“The serious TEAEs related to renal and urinary tract disorders were assessed as not related to esketamine and resolved while the treatment was ongoing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAt the OP/MAINT phase endpoint, 76.5% of patients were responders and 58.2% were remitters.
“The percentage of responders and remitters at the OP/MAINT phase endpoint was 76.5% and 58.2%, respectively (Table 3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn this study, 6 patients (0.7%) attempted suicide, corresponding to 1.571 attempts per 100 patient years.
“In the present study, 14.5% of patients who did not have suicidal ideation at baseline reported new suicidal ideation, 6 patients (0.7%) attempted suicide (1.571 per 100 patient years), and 1 patient completed suicide (0.262 per 100 patient years).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo interstitial cystitis or respiratory depression occurred.
“There was no case of interstitial cystitis or respiratory depression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn patients with low cardiovascular risk at baseline, blood pressure increases after esketamine were generally transient and led to discontinuation in 0.7% of patients.
“In patients with low cardiovascular risk at baseline, increases in BP observed after esketamine administration were generally transient and led to discontinuation in 0.7% of patients.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMaximum post-dose CADSS total scores generally declined over time, with the steepest decline during the 4-week induction phase.
“Maximum post-dose CADSS total scores generally declined over time, with the steepest decline in the 4-week induction phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe PHQ-9 responder rate at endpoint was 461 of 744 patients (62.0%) in the induction phase and 449 of 602 patients (74.6%) in the optimization/maintenance phase.
“Responders c at endpoint, n (%) 461 (62.0) d 449 (74.6) e”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe anxiety and delusions events were reported together with a serious treatment-emergent adverse event of alcohol abuse, judged not esketamine-related, 5 days after the first esketamine dose.
“The events of anxiety and delusions were reported together with the serious TEAE of alcohol abuse (not esketaminerelated), 5 days after administration of the first dose of esketamine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOne patient with marked ALT and bilirubin elevations was discontinued because of hepatitis B and ovarian cancer.
“One patient with marked ALT and bilirubin elevations was discontinued due to hepatitis B and ovarian cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingnone givenThe investigator did not consider the suicide death to be related to esketamine treatment.
“The event was not considered related to esketamine treatment by the investigator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataDuring the induction and optimization/maintenance phases, 13 patients (1.7%) had alanine aminotransferase elevations greater than 3 times the upper limit of normal, and in 11 of these patients the elevations returned to baseline or near baseline while esketamine treatment continued.
“During the IND and OP/MAINT phases, 13 (1.7%)patients had elevations of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >3 times the upper limit of normal; in 11 patients these elevations returned to baseline or near baseline levels while treatment with esketamine was ongoing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataOne of the two deaths in the study was a 60-year-old man with a history of hypertension and right lower limb vein surgery, who died on study day 113 (last esketamine dose day 108) from acute cardiac and respiratory failure, which the investigator assessed as doubtfully related to esketamine.
“Of the two deaths reported, one patient, a 60-year-old man, with a medical history of hypertension and right lower limb vein surgery, died on day 113 of the study (last dose of esketamine: day 108) due to acute cardiac and respiratory failure that were assessed as doubtfully related to esketamine treatment by the investigator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe PHQ-9 remission rate at endpoint was 201 patients (26.9%) in the induction phase and 286 patients (47.4%) in the optimization/maintenance phase.
“Remitters f at endpoint, n (%) 201 (26.9) b 286 (47.4)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe SDS remission rate at endpoint was 137 of 648 patients (21.1%) in the induction phase and 220 of 557 patients (39.5%) in the optimization/maintenance phase.
“| Remitters j at endpoint, n (%) | 137 (21.1) d | 220 (39.5) g |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe SDS responder rate at endpoint was 310 of 648 patients (47.8%) in the induction phase and 351 of 557 patients (63.0%) in the optimization/maintenance phase.
“| (%) | 310 (47.8) d | 351 (63.0) g |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMean PHQ-9 total scores decreased from induction baseline to endpoint, and this improvement appeared to be maintained from optimization/maintenance baseline to endpoint.
“The mean (SD) PHQ-9 total scores decreased from IND baseline to endpoint and this improvement appeared to be maintained from OP/MAINT baseline to endpoint”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMean SDS total score fell from 22.2 at induction baseline to 12.8 at induction endpoint, and from 11.3 at optimization/maintenance baseline to 9.5 at optimization/maintenance endpoint.
“Baseline b , mean (SD) | 22.2 (5.45) c | 11.3 (7.27) f |”
- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
“Endpoint, mean (SD) | 12.8 (7.89) d | 9.5 (7.89) g |”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § Additional information · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataDelirium occurred 35 minutes after esketamine dosing on day 127 in a patient with a prior history of alcohol use.
“Delirium occurred 35 minutes after esketamine dosing on day 127 in a patient with prior history of alcohol use.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn the STAR*D study, remission rates by QIDS-SR ≤5 were 30.6% after 2, 13.7% after 3, and 13.0% after 4 failed antidepressant trials.
“In the landmark Sequenced Treatment Alternatives to Relieve Depression (STAR*D) study, 38 remission rates assessed by a different instrument and more strict criteria (Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report [QIDS-SR] ≤ 5) were 30.6% after 2, 13.7% after 3, and 13.0% after 4 failed AD trials.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [38] 38. Rush AJ, Trivedi MH, Wisniewski SR, et al. Acute and longer-term outcomes in depressed outpatients requiring one or several treatment steps: a STAR*D report. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(11):1905-1917. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationSuicidal ideation and behavior are associated with treatment-resistant depression, with estimated incidence rates of 0.47 completed and 4.66 attempted suicides per 100 patient years.
“Suicidal ideation and behavior are associated with TRD with estimated incidence rates of 0.47 completed and 4.66 attempted suicides per 100 patient years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] 32. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 32. Bergfeld IO, Mantione M, Figee M, et al. Treatment-resistant depression and suicidality. J Affect Disord. 2018;235:362-367. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOver up to one year, esketamine nasal spray was acceptably tolerated, and its adverse event profile resembled that seen in shorter studies of patients with treatment-resistant depression.
“Long-term (up to 1 year) treatment with esketamine nasal spray demonstrated acceptable tolerability and an adverse event profile comparable with that of the shortterm studies in patients with TRD.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The open-label design did not materially affect the safety findings.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe definition of remission as MADRS ≤12 was selected because patients had TRD and higher baseline MADRS scores than typically included in general MDD studies.
“The definition of remission as a MADRS score ≤ 12 was selected taking into account that the patients manifested TRD prior to entry and thus had higher MADRS scores at baseline than those typically included for studies assessing the efficacy of new treatments in the general MDD population.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenThis study had limitations including an open-label design, simultaneous initiation of a new oral antidepressant, and absence of a control group.
“This study had several limitations including its openlabel study design, the simultaneous initiation of a new OAD, and the absence of a control group; however, the high response and remission rates suggest that long-term (up to 1 year) esketamine treatment appears to provide sustained symptom improvement.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataReductions in depressive symptoms were observed during the first 4 weeks of treatment (IND phase) and appeared to be sustained through the 1-year exposure period.
“Reductions in depressive symptoms were observed during the first 4 weeks of treatment (IND phase) and appeared to be sustained through the 1-year exposure period.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAnother study reported that in patients with treatment-resistant depression, the lifetime risk of suicide attempts is assessed to be close to 30%.
“Another study 33 reported that in TRD patients, the life-time risk of suicide attempts is assessed to be close to 30%.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [33] 33. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 33. Dunner DL, Rush AJ, Russell JM, et al. Prospective, long-term, multicenter study of the naturalistic outcomes of patients with treatment-resistant depression. J Clin Psychiatry. 2006;67(5):688-695. source
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCollectively, the findings and PWC-20 discontinuation symptoms suggest that withdrawal symptoms were infrequent, mild, and generally indistinguishable from early return of MDD symptoms.
“Collectively, these findings and discontinuation-related symptoms from the PWC-20 assessment suggest that withdrawal symptoms were infrequent, mild, and in quality appeared generally indistinguishable from early return in MDD symptoms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningFor most patients, the findings suggested consistent benefits and acceptable tolerability of esketamine nasal spray treatment over up to 1 year.
“As dosing frequency was based on treatment response together with tolerability, for most patients, the findings suggested consistent benefits and acceptable tolerability of esketamine nasal spray treatment over a period of up to 1 year.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationA single subanesthetic dose (0.2 and 0.5 mg/kg) of ketamine showed no cognitive impairment in patients with TRD, but effects of repeated longer-term use remain elusive.
“Although a single subanesthetic dose (0.2 and 0.5-mg/kg) of ketamine showed no cognitive impairment (working memory and go/no-go tasks on days 3 and 14 postketamine infusion) in patients with TRD, effects on cognitive performance with repeated use of ketamine over longer periods remains elusive.34”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] 34. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 34. Chen MH, Li CT, Lin WC, et al. Cognitive function of patients with treatment-resistant depression after a single low dose of ketamine infusion. J Affect Disord. 2018;241:1-7. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f source
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThese suicide rates are substantially higher than in the general MDD population and similar to those before and after treatments such as electroconvulsive therapy.
“These rates are substantially higher than those in the general MDD population and similar to those found before and after treatments such as electroconvulsive therapy.32”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] 32. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 32. Bergfeld IO, Mantione M, Figee M, et al. Treatment-resistant depression and suicidality. J Affect Disord. 2018;235:362-367. source
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCognitive deficits, impairments in working memory, and decrements in episodic memory have been documented following acute and repeated recreational abuse of ketamine.
“Cognitive deficits, impairments in working memory, and decrements in episodic memory have been documented following acute and repeated recreational abuse of ketamine.8”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [8] 8. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 8. Morgan CJ, Muetzelfeldt L, Curran HV. Consequences of chronic ketamine self- administration upon neurocognitive function and psychological wellbeing: a 1-year longitudinal study. Addiction. 2010;105(1):121-133. source
The paper relies on this without support.
Long-term safety data for esketamine in treatment-resistant depression were lacking before this study.
“data on its long-term safety have been lacking prior to the current study.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Esketamine has shown favorable efficacy and tolerability in short-term studies of treatment-resistant depression.
“Esketamine has shown favorable efficacy and tolerability in short-term studies of patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD)”
The paper relies on this without support.
The open-label design did not materially affect the safety findings.
“This open-label (OL), multicenter study was conducted between October 2015 and October 2017 at 114 sites in 21 countries.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Esketamine's rapid plasma clearance, short half-life, and low dosing frequency prevent steady-state accumulation in patients.
“Notably, the rapid clearance from plasma, short half-life, and low frequency of dosing (weekly or everyother-week) did not allow esketamine to reach steady-state in patients dosed in this study.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Intranasal esketamine spray co-initiated with an antidepressant has demonstrated rapid clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with TRD.
“Intranasal esketamine spray co- initi ated with an antidepressant has also demonstrated rapid clinically meaningful efficacy in patients with TRD.”
From Treatment‐resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions (2023) · cites this paper as [195]
The Efficacy section (page unavailable) reports substantial improvement during the four-week induction phase in patients receiving esketamine nasal spray plus an oral antidepressant. The Discussion says reductions were observed during those four weeks, but does not establish how rapidly clinically meaningful improvement occurred. It also notes that the study was open-label and had no control group, limiting what it can demonstrate about efficacy. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThere are data demonstrating long-term (greater than 3-year) safety and tolerability for esketamine.
“Unlike IV ketamine, there are also data demonstrating long- term (i.e., greater than 3- year) safety and tolerability for esketamine 194,195 .”
From Treatment‐resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions (2023) · cites this paper as [195]
The Clinical Points and Discussion (page numbers not supplied) report acceptable safety and tolerability for esketamine nasal spray treatment lasting up to one year. They do not support the attributed duration of greater than three years. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe absence of long-term data with SGAs is a point of differentiation with esketamine, which has long-term multi-year establishment of efficacy and safety.
“The absence of long- term data with SGAs is a point of differentiation with esketamine, which has long- term multi- year establishment of efficacy and safety 195 .”
From Treatment‐resistant depression: definition, prevalence, detection, management, and investigational interventions (2023) · cites this paper as [195]
The Discussion (page unavailable) reports favorable safety and sustained symptom improvement with esketamine plus an oral antidepressant for up to one year. It does not establish efficacy and safety over multiple years, and it does not compare the availability of long-term data for esketamine and SGAs. The study also notes its open-label design and lack of a control group. (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredNo deaths were reported in the placebo group in the long-term open-label study.
“No deaths were reported in the placebo group.”
From Pharmacotherapies Targeting GABA-Glutamate Neurotransmission for Treatment-Resistant Depression (2023) · cites this paper as [113]
The approvals of esketamine nasal spray were based on efficacy and safety findings from phase 2/3 studies of treatment-resistant depression treatment for 4 weeks to 1 year.
“The approvals of esketamine nasal spray were based on efficacy and safety findings from phase 2/3 studies of TRD treatment for 4 weeks to 1 year [9–14].”
The safety profile of esketamine with continuous intermittent dosing for up to 4.5 years in SUSTAIN-3 (2,769 cumulative patient-years) is consistent with its established safety profile in participants with TRD treated for up to 1 year.
“The safety profile of esketamine, with continuous intermittent dosing for up to 4.5 years in SUSTAIN-3 (2,769 cumulative patient-years), is consistent with its established safety profile in participants with TRD treated for up to 1 year [7, 8, 14].”
The incidence of clinically-relevant sedation (MOAA/S score ≤3) in SUSTAIN-3 (6.1% induction, 6.9% optimization/maintenance) is similar to that observed in the prior long-term SUSTAIN-2 study (8.4% and 7.0%, respectively).
“The incidence of clinically-relevant sedation (MOAA/S score ≤ 3) in SUSTAIN-3 (6.1% in the induction phase and 6.9% in the optimization/maintenance phase) is similar to that observed in the prior long-term SUSTAIN-2 study (8.4% and 7.0% in the respective phases) [14].”
Our findings extend those of Wajs et al., who reported a 47.2% remission rate at 12 months.
“Our findings extend those of Wajs et al. [14], who reported a 47.2% remission rate at 12 months.”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Reported absence of impaired reaction time conflicts with patient data
MajorThe paper says no patient had impaired reaction time at endpoints, using a z-score threshold below −1.5. In the simple-reaction-time table, patient 15 had a baseline score of 0.52 and an OP/MAINT endpoint score of −2.68.
“no patient manifested impaired reaction time (z score < -1.5 on detection or identification tasks) at study endpoints and follow-up”
“15 71 0.52 -2.01 -1.38 -1.59 -0.43 -2.68 -0.83”
Cites
A new depression scale designed to be sensitive to change
Montgomery, S. A., & Åsberg, M. (1979) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.134.4.382 · Cited by 13,962 · see citing works
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090 · see citing works
Spitzer, R. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · Cited by 9,802 · see citing works
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Wisniewski, S. R., Nierenberg, A. A., Stewart, J. W., Warden, D., Niederehe, G., Thase, M. E., Lavori, P. W., Lebowitz, B. D., et al. (2006) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.2006.163.11.1905 · Cited by 5,643 · see citing works
Posner, K., Brown, G. K., Stanley, B., Brent, D. A., Yershova, K. V., Oquendo, M. A., Currier, G. W., Melvin, G. A., Greenhill, L., Shen, S., et al. (2011) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.10111704 · Cited by 5,157 · see citing works
Benedict, R. H. B., Schretlen, D., Groninger, L., & Brandt, J. (1998) · The Clinical Neuropsychologist · doi:10.1076/clin.12.1.43.1726 · Cited by 1,597 · see citing works
Sheehan, D. V., Harnett-Sheehan, K., & Raj, B. A. (1996) · International Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/00004850-199606003-00015 · Cited by 1,440 · see citing works
Validity and Reliability of the Observer??s
CHERNIK, D. A., Gillings, D. B., LAINE, H., Hendler, J., Silver, J., DAVIDSON, A. B., Schwam, E. M., & Siegel, J. L. (1990) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/00004714-199008000-00003 · Cited by 1,246 · see citing works
Assessing Psychiatric Impairment in Primary Care with the Sheehan Disability Scale
Leon, A. C., Olfson, M., Portera, L., Farber, L., & Sheehan, D. V. (1997) · The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine · doi:10.2190/t8em-c8yh-373n-1uwd · Cited by 987 · see citing works
Popova, V., Daly, E. J., Trivedi, M., Cooper, K., Lane, R., Lim, P., Mazzucco, C., Hough, D., Thase, M. E., Shelton, R. C., et al. (2019) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19020172 · Cited by 904 · see citing works
Self-citationBremner, J. D., Krystal, J. H., Putnam, F. W., Southwick, S. M., Marmar, C., Charney, D. S., & Mazure, C. M. (1998) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1023/a:1024465317902 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Daly, E. J., Trivedi, M. H., Janik, A., Li, H., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Lane, R., Lim, P., Duca, A. R., Hough, D., et al. (2019) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.1189 · Cited by 795 · see citing works
Self-citationDaly, E. J., Singh, J. B., Fedgchin, M., Cooper, K., Lim, P., Shelton, R. C., Thase, M. E., Winokur, A., Van Nueten, L., Manji, H., et al. (2018) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.3739 · Cited by 718 · see citing works
Self-citationFedgchin, M., Trivedi, M., Daly, E. J., Melkote, R., Lane, R., Lim, P., Vitagliano, D., Blier, P., Fava, M., Liebowitz, M., et al. (2019) · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyz039 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Self-citationSide-effects associated with ketamine use in depression: a systematic review
Short, B., Fong, J., Galvez, V., Shelker, W., & Loo, C. K. (2018) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30272-9 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Ochs-Ross, R., Daly, E. J., Zhang, Y., Lane, R., Lim, P., Morrison, R. L., Hough, D., Manji, H., Drevets, W. C., Sanacora, G., et al. (2020) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2019.10.008 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Self-citationSingh, J. B., Fedgchin, M., Daly, E., Xi, L., Melman, C., De Bruecker, G., Tadic, A., Sienaert, P., Wiegand, F., Manji, H., et al. (2016) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2015.10.018 · Cited by 466 · see citing works
Self-citationMorgan, C. J. A., Muetzelfeldt, L., & Curran, H. V. (2010) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02761.x · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Goldberg, T. E., Harvey, P. D., Wesnes, K. A., Snyder, P. J., & Schneider, L. S. (2015) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring · doi:10.1016/j.dadm.2014.11.003 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
(2013) · doi:10.2217/ahe.13.38 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates
Abshire, M., Dinglas, V. D., Cajita, M. I. A., Eakin, M. N., Needham, D. M., & Himmelfarb, C. D. (2017) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0310-z · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Treatment-resistant depression and suicidality
Bergfeld, I. O., Mantione, M., Figee, M., Schuurman, P. R., Lok, A., & Denys, D. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.04.016 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Dunner, D. L., Rush, A. J., Russell, J. M., Burke, M., Woodard, S., Wingard, P., & Allen, J. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.v67n0501 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
Zimmerman, M., Posternak, M. A., & Chelminski, I. (2004) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2004.03.007 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Mirtazapine Versus Venlafaxine in Hospitalized Severely Depressed Patients With Melancholic Features
Guelfi, J. D., Ansseau, M., Timmerman, L., & Korsgaard, S. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/00004714-200108000-00010 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Wilkinson, S. T., Katz, R. B., Toprak, M., Webler, R. D., Ostroff, R. B., & Sanacora, G. (2018) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.17m11731 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Self-citationChen, M.-H., Li, C.-T., Lin, W.-C., Hong, C.-J., Tu, P.-C., Bai, Y.-M., Cheng, C.-M., & Su, T.-P. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.033 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationHumphrey, L., Arbuckle, R., Moldwin, R., Nordling, J., van de Merwe, J. P., Meunier, J., Crook, T., & Abraham, L. (2012) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.004 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Physician Withdrawal Checklist (PWC-20)
Rickels, K., Garcia-Espana, F., Mandos, L. A., & Case, G. W. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/jcp.0b013e31817efbac · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Desseilles, M., Witte, J. M., Chang, T. E., Iovieno, N., Dording, C. M., Ashih, H., Nyer, M., Freeman, M. P., D, M. F. M., & Mischoulon, D. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.11ac07225 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Sustained Response to Open-Label Venlafaxine in Drug-Resistant Major Depression
Schweitzer, I., Burrows, G., Tuckwell, V., Polonowita, A., Flynn, P., George, T. P., Theodoros, M. T., & Mitchell, P. B. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/00004714-200104000-00010 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
(2013) · doi:10.1093/fampra/cmt028 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Aluisio, L. E., Wajs, E., DiBernardo, A., Chen, N., Drevets, W. C., Daly, E., Zannikos, P., Curran, V. H., Krystal, A., Chen, G., et al. (2019) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.09.346 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Self-citationMorrison, R. M., Singh, J. B., Daly, E., Fedgchin, M. M., Wajs, E., Alusio, L., Ochs-Ross, R., Popova, V., Карчер, К., Lane, R., et al. (2019) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2019.09.104
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [7]7. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 7. Morgan CJ, Curran HV; Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs. Ketamine use: a review. Addiction. 2012;107(1):27-38.
- [9]9. P u M e d C r o s s R e f 9. Sanacora G, Frye MA, McDonald W, et al; American Psychiatric Association (APA) Council of Research Task Force on Novel Biomarkers and Treatments. A consensus statement on the use of ketamine in the treatment of mood disorders. JAMA Psychiatry. 2017;74(4):399-405.
- [28]28. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 26. Guy W. CGI Clinical Global Impressions. ECDEU Assessment Manual for Psychopharmacology. Rockville, MD: National Institute of Mental Health; 1976:217-222.
- [35]35. Bruce KM, Robinson SR, Smith JA, et al. Validity of a screening tool for detecting subtle cognitive impairment in the middle-aged and elderly. Clin Interv Aging. 2014;9:2165-2176. 35. P u b M e d
- [39]39. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 39. Al-Harbi KS. Treatment-resistant depression: therapeutic trends, challenges, and future directions. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2012;6:369-388.
- [40]40. P u b M e d C r o s s R e f 40. ICH Harmonised tripartite guideline-The Extent Of Population Exposure To Assess Clinical Safety For Drugs Intended For Long-Term Treatment Of Non-Life-Threatening Conditions E1. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; 1994.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McIntyre, R. S., Alsuwaidan, M., Baune, B. T., Berk, M., Demyttenaere, K., Goldberg, J. F., Gorwood, P., Ho, R., Kasper, S., Kennedy, S. H., et al. (2023) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21120 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
Self-citationMcIntyre, R. S., Rosenblat, J. D., Nemeroff, C. B., Sanacora, G., Murrough, J. W., Berk, M., Brietzke, E., Dodd, S., Gorwood, P., Ho, R., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20081251 · Cited by 731 · see citing works
“It is reassuring that a long-term study with intranasal esketamine did not identify a significant percentage of individuals experiencing genitourinary symptoms (100, 101).”
BackgroundSelf-citationNovel and emerging treatments for major depression.
Marwaha, S., Palmer, E. R., Suppes, T., Cons, E., Young, A. H., & Upthegrove, R. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)02080-3 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
Self-citationOchs-Ross, R., Daly, E. J., Zhang, Y., Lane, R., Lim, P., Morrison, R. L., Hough, D., Manji, H., Drevets, W. C., Sanacora, G., et al. (2020) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2019.10.008 · Cited by 481 · see citing works
Self-citationKetamine: A tale of two enantiomers
Jelen, L. A., Young, A. H., & Stone, J. M. (2020) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881120959644 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
“A subsequent open-label study has examined the longterm safety of (S)-ketamine nasal spray plus a new oral antidepressant in patients with TRD (Wajs et al., 2020).”
BackgroundSelf-citationEsketamine Nasal Spray versus Quetiapine for Treatment-Resistant Depression
Reif, A., Bitter, I., Buyze, J., Cebulla, K., Frey, R., Fu, D.-J., Ito, T., Kambarov, Y., Llorca, P.-M., Oliveira-Maia, A. J., et al. (2023) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa2304145 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Self-citationAlnefeesi, Y., Chen-Li, D., Krane, E., Jawad, M. Y., Rodrigues, N. B., Ceban, F., Di Vincenzo, J. D., Meshkat, S., Ho, R. C. M., Gill, H., et al. (2022) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2022.04.037 · Cited by 186 · see citing works
Smith-Apeldoorn, S. Y., Veraart, J. K., Spijker, J., Kamphuis, J., & Schoevers, R. A. (2022) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(22)00317-0 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Martinotti, G., Vita, A., Fagiolini, A., Maina, G., Bertolino, A., Dell'Osso, B., Siracusano, A., Clerici, M., Bellomo, A., Sani, G., et al. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.09.043 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
Novel Glutamatergic Modulators for the Treatment of Mood Disorders: Current Status
Henter, I. D., Park, L. T., & Zarate, C. A. (2021) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-021-00816-x · Cited by 142 · see citing works
“These issues remain a concern, particularly in the context of long-term (R,S)-ketamine/esketamine use, and suggest that the side effect, safety, and addiction profile of these agents should be explored in larger studies designed to better identify the limitations associated with long-term use [65, 66].”
BackgroundGastaldon, C., Raschi, E., Kane, J. M., Barbui, C., & Schoretsanitis, G. (2021) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000510703 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Zaki, N., Chen, L., Lane, R., Doherty, T., Drevets, W. C., Morrison, R. L., Sanacora, G., Wilkinson, S. T., Popova, V., & Fu, D.-J. (2023) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1038/s41386-023-01577-5 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
“5 years in SUSTAIN-3 (2,769 cumulative patientyears), is consistent with its established safety profile in participants with TRD treated for up to 1 year [7, 8, 14].”
Self-citationLong-term safety of ketamine and esketamine in treatment of depression
Nikayin, S., Murphy, E., Krystal, J. H., & Wilkinson, S. T. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1080/14740338.2022.2066651 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
“older patients (ages 65 or greater), reaction time slowed starting around week 20 of the maintenance phase [10].”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe molecular pathophysiology of depression and the new therapeutics
Tian, H., Hu, Z., Xu, J., & Wang, C. (2022) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.156 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Wilkinson, S. T., Rhee, T. G., Joormann, J., Webler, R., Ortiz Lopez, M., Kitay, B., Fasula, M., Elder, C., Fenton, L., & Sanacora, G. (2021) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000517074 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Self-citationGreenway, K. T., Garel, N., Jerome, L., & Feduccia, A. A. (2020) · Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1080/17512433.2020.1772054 · Cited by 94 · see citing works
“pressants [177], typically administered by repeated 40-minute IV 0.”
BackgroundDodd, S., Bauer, M., Carvalho, A. F., Eyre, H. A., D, M. F. M., Kasper, S. F., Kennedy, S. H., Khoo, J., López‐Jaramillo, C., Malhi, G. S., et al. (2020) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/15622975.2020.1851052 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationEsketamine Treatment for Depression in Adults: A PRISMA Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Fountoulakis, K. N., Saitis, A., & Schatzberg, A. F. (2025) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.20240515 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Kasper, S. F., Cubała, W. J., Fagiolini, A. M., Ramos‐Quiroga, J. A., Souery, D., & Young, A. H. (2020) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/15622975.2020.1836399 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
Self-citationEsketamine for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Review of Clinical Evidence (Review)
Vasiliu, O. (2023) · Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine · doi:10.3892/etm.2023.11810 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“The duration of moni‑ toring was 48 weeks; MADRS scores decreased during the induction phase (41).”
InfluentialBrain Changes Associated With Long-Term Ketamine Abuse, A Systematic Review
Strous, J. F. M., Weeland, C. J., van der Draai, F. A., Daams, J. G., Denys, D. A. J. P., Lok, A., Schoevers, R. A., & Figee, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Neuroanatomy · doi:10.3389/fnana.2022.795231 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Novel antidepressant drugs: Beyond monoamine targets
Gonda, X., Döme, P., Neill, J. C., & Tarazi, F. I. (2021) · CNS Spectrums · doi:10.1017/s1092852921000791 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Martinotti, G., Dell’Osso, B. M., Lorenzo, G. D., Maina, G., Bertolino, A., Clerici, M., Barlati, S., Rosso, G., Nicola, M. D., Marcatili, M., et al. (2023) · Bipolar Disorders · doi:10.1111/bdi.13296 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Loo, C. K. A., Glozier, N., Barton, D., Baune, B. T., Mills, N. T., Fitzgerald, P. B., Glue, P., Sarma, S., Gálvez, V., Hadži-Pavlović, D., et al. (2023) · The British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.2023.79 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
“4,26 The current results do confirm that if ketamine treat-ment is halted after 4 weeks, the benefits are not sustained for all remitters and that ongoing treatment should be considered.”
Esketamine: new hope for the treatment of treatment-resistant depression? A narrative review
Salahudeen, M. S., Wright, C. M., & Peterson, G. M. (2020) · Therapeutic Advances in Drug Safety · doi:10.1177/2042098620937899 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Novel Pharmacological Approaches to the Treatment of Depression
Elias, E., Zhang, A. Y., & Manners, M. T. (2022) · Life · doi:10.3390/life12020196 · Cited by 74 · see citing works
“MDD and TRD patients who received esketamine alone or in combination with standard antidepressants had significant improvement in MDD symptoms compared to standard antidepressants [80], with high tolerability and safety [81].”
MethodNikkheslat, N. (2021) · Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health · doi:10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100383 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Glutamatergic Modulators for Major Depression from Theory to Clinical Use
McIntyre, R. S., & Jain, R. (2024) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-024-01114-y · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Caldiroli, A., Capuzzi, E., Tagliabue, I., Capellazzi, M., Marcatili, M., Mucci, F., Colmegna, F., Clerici, M., Buoli, M., & Dakanalis, A. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms222313070 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
Doherty, T., Wajs, E., Melkote, R., Miller, J., Singh, J. B., & Weber, M. A. (2020) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-020-00699-4 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
“Esketamine, the S-enantiomer of ketamine racemate, was recently approved by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and by the European Medicines Agency (EMA) as an intranasal formulation for adults with TRD based on efficacy and safety findings from short-term phase II/III studies [4–9] and longer-t…”
BackgroundSelf-citationShen, J., Song, C., Lu, X., Wen, Y., Song, S., Yu, J., & Sun, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1038379 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
“During 1 year of esketamine maintenance treatment (30), five patients (0.”
BackgroundTHERAPEUTIC MECHANISMS OF KETAMINE
Mihaljević, S., Pavlović, M., Reine, K., & Čačić, M. (2020) · Psychiatria Danubina · doi:10.24869/psyd.2020.325 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
Ketamine and its metabolites: Potential as novel treatments for depression
Zhang, K., Yao, Y., & Hashimoto, K. (2022) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109305 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Chen, G., Chen, L., Zhang, Y., Li, X., Lane, R., Lim, P., Daly, E. J., Furey, M., Fedgchin, M., Popova, V., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyab084 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Self-citationTakahashi, N., Yamada, A., Shiraishi, A., Shimizu, H., Goto, R., & Tominaga, Y. (2021) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-021-03538-y · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Samalin, L., Rothärmel, M., Mekaoui, L., Gaudré-Wattinne, E., Codet, M.-A., Bouju, S., & Sauvaget, A. (2022) · International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1080/13651501.2022.2030757 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“Overall, the safety and tolerability profile of esketamine in this French ATUc programme was acceptable and consistent with the findings described in previous studies (Daly et al. 2019; Fedgchin et al. 2019; Popova et al. 2019; Ochs-Ross et al. 2020; Wajs et al. 2020).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialMcQuaid, J. R., Buelt, A., Capaldi, V., Fuller, M., Issa, F., Lang, A. E., Hoge, C., Oslin, D. W., Sall, J., Wiechers, I. R., et al. (2022) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m22-1603 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
“Although there is evidence to support longer-term maintenance use of esketamine, it too has been primarily studied in patients who have previously not responded to trials of antidepressants (37, 38).”
BackgroundEsketamine Monotherapy in Adults With Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Janik, A., Qiu, X., Lane, R., Popova, V., Drevets, W. C., Canuso, C. M., Macaluso, M., Mattingly, G. W., Shelton, R. C., Zajecka, J. M., et al. (2025) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.1317 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Self-citationd’Andrea, G., Pettorruso, M., Lorenzo, G. D., Rhee, T. G., Chiappini, S., Carullo, R., Barlati, S., Zanardi, R., Rosso, G., Nicola, M. D., et al. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.12.038 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Wang, S., Kim, N.-Y., Na, H.-R., Lim, H. K., Woo, Y. S., Pae, C., & Bahk, W. (2021) · Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience · doi:10.9758/cpn.2021.19.2.341 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“However, number of studies investing long-term safety and tolerability of intranasal esketamine are scarce [35].”
BackgroundChiappini, S., d’Andrea, G., Filippis, S. D., Nicola, M. D., Andriola, I., Bassetti, R., Barlati, S., Pettorruso, M., Sensi, S. L., Clerici, M., et al. (2023) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2023.04.011 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“…were dissociation and sedation, as previously recorded in both clinical and pharma-covigilance studies ( McIntyre et al., 2021 ; Guo et al., 2022 ; Wajs et al., 2020 ); specifically, side effects monitoring was limited to two hours as requested by the SPC, and they did not require any major…”
Vekhova, K. A., Namiot, E. D., Jonsson, J., & Schiöth, H. B. (2024) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.3478 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
“42,53 58 In December, 2019, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) approved Spravato® in combination with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) for patients with TRD. 62 A systematic review and meta-analysis by Orhurhu et al .…”
Reporting of harms in clinical trials of esketamine in depression: a systematic review
de Laportalière, T. T., Jullien, A., Yrondi, A., Cestac, P., & Montastruc, F. (2023) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291723001058 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
“Psychological Medicine 4307 Ochs-Ross et al., 2020; Popova et al., 2019; Takahashi et al., 2021; Wajs et al., 2020).”
BackgroundPharmacotherapies Targeting GABA-Glutamate Neurotransmission for Treatment-Resistant Depression
Vecera, C. M., C. Courtes, A., Jones, G., Soares, J. C., & Machado-Vieira, R. (2023) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph16111572 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
“Although interpreted by the investigator as unrelated to esketamine, the suicide completer had no history of suicidal behavior or intent [113].”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLi, Y., Wu, H., Jiang, X., Dong, Y.-F., Zheng, J., & Gao, J. (2022) · Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B · doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2022.04.001 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Genome-wide association study and polygenic risk score analysis of esketamine treatment response
Li, Q. S., Wajs, E., Ochs-Ross, R., Singh, J. B., & Drevets, W. C. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69291-6 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Self-citationAn, D., Wei, C., Wang, J., & Wu, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648691 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Ng, J., Rosenblat, J. D., Lui, L. M. W., Teopiz, K. M., Lee, Y. L., Lipsitz, O., Mansur, R. B., Rodrigues, N. B., Nasri, F., Gill, H., et al. (2021) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.06.032 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Sapkota, A., Khurshid, H., Qureshi, I. A., Jahan, N., Went, T. R., Sultan, W., & Alfonso, M. (2021) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.17352 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Swainson, J., Klassen, L. J., Brennan, S., Chokka, P. R., Katzman, M. A., Tanguay, R. L., & Khullar, A. (2022) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-022-00897-2 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
“Further evidence may be gleaned from a 48-week open-label extension phase III esketamine nasal spray trial, where there were no reports of drug seeking, overdose, abuse, or patient requests for dose increases beyond the maximum study dosage of 84 mg once weekly [71].”
BackgroundOchs-Ross, R., Wajs, E., Daly, E., Zhang, Y., Lane, R., Lim, P., Drevets, W. C., Steffens, D. C., Sanacora, G., Jamieson, C., et al. (2021) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2021.09.014 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
Self-citationSafety and effectiveness of NMDA receptor antagonists for depression: A multidisciplinary review
Moore, T. J., Alami, A., Alexander, G. C., & Mattison, D. R. (2022) · Pharmacotherapy The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy · doi:10.1002/phar.2707 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
d’Andrea, G., Chiappini, S., McIntyre, R. S., Stefanelli, G., Carullo, R., Andriola, I., Zanardi, R., Martiadis, V., Sensi, S. L., Sani, G., et al. (2023) · American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2023.06.016 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Safety and efficacy with esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: long-term extension study
Zaki, N., Chen, L., Lane, R., Doherty, T., Drevets, W. C., Morrison, R. L., Sanacora, G., Wilkinson, S. T., Young, A. H., Lacerda, A. L. T., et al. (2025) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyaf027 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
“12 The SUSTAIN-3 trial (NCT02782104) was conducted to assess longer-term safety (including cognitive, hepatic, and renal safety) and sustained efficacy of esketamine nasal spray, combined with an oral antidepressant, in patients with TRD. Reported herein are the final results of SUSTAIN-3, which…”
Self-citationAntianhedonic effect of repeated ketamine infusions in patients with treatment resistant depression
Wilkowska, A., Wiglusz, M. S., Gałuszko-Wegielnik, M., Włodarczyk, A., & Cubała, W. J. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.704330 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
“Similar to benzodiazepines, ketamine has abuse potential (32); therefore, it is particularly important to follow-up patients on ketamine treatment, especially on long-term use as this regimen seems to be the most effective (33).”
BackgroundVincenzo, M. D., Martiadis, V., Rocca, B. D., Arsenio, E., D’Arpa, A., Volpicelli, A., Luciano, M., Sampogna, G., & Fiorillo, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1394787 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Benefit–Risk Assessment of Esketamine Nasal Spray vs. Placebo in Treatment‐Resistant Depression
Katz, E. G., Hough, D. W., Doherty, T., Lane, R., Singh, J. B., & Levitan, B. S. (2020) · Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1002/cpt.2024 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationIntranasal esketamine: From origins to future implications in treatment-resistant depression
Sanders, B. J., & Brula, A. Q. (2021) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.02.020 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Souza‐Marques, B., Santos‐Lima, C., Araújo-de-Freitas, L., Vieira, F., Jesus‐Nunes, A. P., Quarantini, L. C., & Sampaio, A. S. (2021) · Harvard Review of Psychiatry · doi:10.1097/hrp.0000000000000312 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Ng, J., Lui, L. M. W., Rosenblat, J. D., Teopiz, K. M., Lipsitz, O., Cha, D. S., Xiong, J., Nasri, F., Lee, Y. L., Kratiuk, K., et al. (2021) · Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00213-021-05767-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“For IN esketamine, two clinical studies have reported a low occurrence (< 10%) of urological complications at antidepressant doses (28–84 mg) (Daly et al. 2019; Wajs et al. 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialJones, R., Freeman, M. P., Kornstein, S. G., Cooper, K., Daly, E., Canuso, C. M., & Nicholson, S. (2022) · Archives of Women s Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s00737-021-01185-6 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationHavlik, J. L., Wahid, S., Teopiz, K. M., McIntyre, R. S., Krystal, J. H., & Rhee, T. G. (2024) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-024-01494-4 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“Wajs et al. similarly performed an open-label multi-site clinical trial to examine the safety and efficacy of esketamine nasal spray alongside a new oral antidepressant as a treatment for TRD [50].”
McIntyre, R. S., Bitter, I., Buyze, J., Fagiolini, A. M., Godinov, Y., Gorwood, P. A. P. M., Ito, T., Oliveira-Maia, A. J., Vieta, E., Werner‐Kiechle, T., et al. (2024) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2024.05.009 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
“…from long-term studies have repeatedly documented the favourable long-term safety profile of esketamine NS, reporting that treatment ‑ emergent dissociative symptoms were generally transient, with no reported events suggestive of abuse (Wajs et al., 2020; Young et al., 2023; Zaki et al., 2023).”
Self-citationVeraart, J. K. E., Smith-Apeldoorn, S. Y., Spaans, H., Kamphuis, J., & Schoevers, R. A. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.11.123 · Cited by 35 · see citing works
The therapeutic role of ketamine and esketamine in treating psychopathological domains of depression
Jawad, M. Y., Vincenzo, J. D. D., Badulescu, S., Teopiz, K. M., Tabassum, A., Ceban, F., Mckenzie, A., Meshkat, S., Rosenblat, J. D., Ho, R., et al. (2022) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109299 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Guo, H., Wang, B., Yuan, S., Wu, S., Liu, J., He, M., & Wang, J. (2022) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.849758 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Rothärmel, M., Benosman, C., El‐Hage, W., Berjamin, C., Ribayrol, D., Guillin, O., Raphaël Gaillard, B., Berkovitch, L., & Moulier, V. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2022.865466 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
“Phase-3 short-term trials of Esketamine nasal spray (28, 56, or 84 mg) plus an oral antidepressant have demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in depressive symptoms [reduction from baseline Montgomery– Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score] in patients with TRD compared with an oral antidepre…”
BackgroundVankawala, J., Naples, G., Avila-Quintero, V. J., Ramírez, K. L., Flores, J. M., Bloch, M. H., & Dwyer, J. B. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.549080 · Cited by 30 · see citing works
Capuzzi, E., Caldiroli, A., Capellazzi, M., Tagliabue, I., Marcatili, M., Colmegna, F., Clerici, M., Buoli, M., & Dakanalis, A. (2021) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms22179338 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
“Some studies may be affected by moderate [28] to high risk of bias [26,30] as well as presenting some concerns in term of risk of bias [31,32].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialJawad, M. Y., Vincenzo, J. D. D., Ceban, F., Jaberi, S., Lui, L. M. W., Gillissie, E. S., Alnefeesi, Y., Rosenblat, J. D., & McIntyre, R. S. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1080/14740338.2022.2058488 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
“Two long-term SUSTAIN trials (> 4 weeks) included were: (1) A relapse prevention study where patients were treated with IN Esketamine for 16 weeks and then those who achieved remission or response were randomized 1:1 into IN Esketamine and IN placebo along with oral antidepressants [23]; (2) A year long open-label tri…”
InfluentialBoudieu, L., Mennetrier, M., Llorca, P., & Samalin, L. (2023) · Pharmaceutics · doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics15122773 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
“The 20-item Physician Withdrawal Checklist was used in four RCTs [32,34,37,42].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialKetamine and the Disinhibition Hypothesis: Neurotrophic Factor-Mediated Treatment of Depression
Borsellino, P., Krider, R. I., Chea, D., Grinnell, R., & Vida, T. A. (2023) · Pharmaceuticals · doi:10.3390/ph16050742 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“1% of patients in the SUSTAIN-2 trial [88] experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event.”
BackgroundResultCastro, M., Wilkinson, S. T., Al Jurdi, R. K., Petrillo, M. P., Zaki, N., Borentain, S., Fu, D. J., Turkoz, I., Sun, L., Brown, B., et al. (2023) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-023-01026-3 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“A recent study found that a subset of patients ≥65 years of age, who were nonresponders to ESK treatment after completing the double-blind induction (IND) phase of a randomized 4-week efficacy study and subsequently entered the IND phase of an open-label, long-term, safety and efficacy study of ESK (SUSTAIN-2), receiv…”
BackgroundSelf-citationBaudot, J., Soeiro, T., Tambon, M., Navarro, N., Veyrac, G., Mezaache, S., & Micallef, J. (2021) · Fundamental and Clinical Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/fcp.12745 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“Adverse event TRANSFORM-1 (NCT02417064) [31] TRANSFORM-2 (NCT02418585) [32] TRANSFORM-3 (NCT02422186) [33] SUSTAIN-1 (NCT02493868) [34] SUSTAIN-2 (NCT02497287) [35]”
BackgroundJeon, H. J., Ju, P., Sulaiman, A. H., Aziz, S. A., Paik, J., Tan, W., Bai, D., & Li, C. (2022) · Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience · doi:10.9758/cpn.2022.20.1.70 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
“The key safety assessments for SUSTAIN-2 included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and “TEAEs of special interest” related to suicidality (assessed by the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale) [33], dissociative symptoms (assessed by the Clinician Administered Dissociative St…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMorrens, J., Mathews, M., Popova, V., Borentain, S., Rive, B., Gonzalez Martin Moro, B., Jamieson, C., & Zhang, Q. (2022) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s358367 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Esketamine combined with SSRI or SNRI for treatment-resistant depression
Del Casale, A., Spirito, S., Arena, J. F., Preissner, S., Borro, M., Gentile, G., Modesti, M. N., Preissner, R., Ferracuti, S., & Simmaco, M. (2025) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2025.0200 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ren, L. (2024) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2023.110910 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
“The clinical trials proved that ( S )-ketamine has a more potent and effective rapid antidepressant-like effect than ( R )-ketamine (Daly et al., 2018; Wajs et al., 2020; Leal et al., 2021; Leal et al., 2023).”
BackgroundLiu, Y., Bavato, F., Chung, A.-N., Liu, T., Chen, Y., Huang, M., & Quednow, B. B. (2021) · The World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/15622975.2021.1907709 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
The antidepressant effect and safety of non-intranasal esketamine: A systematic review
Smith-Apeldoorn, S. Y., Vischjager, M., Veraart, J. K. E., Kamphuis, J., Rot, M. A. H., & Schoevers, R. A. (2022) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/02698811221084055 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“These symptoms as well as marked psychomimetic symptoms have, however, also been reported after racemic ketamine and IN esketamine administration (Fedgchin et al., 2019; Short et al., 2018; Wajs et al., 2020).”
BackgroundNikayin, S., & Sanacora, G. (2021) · CNS Drugs · doi:10.1007/s40263-021-00851-8 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationBayes, A. J., Short, B. L., Zarate, C. A., Park, L., Murrough, J. W., McLoughlin, D. M., Riva‐Posse, P., Schoevers, R. A., Veraart, J. K. E., Parikh, S. V., et al. (2022) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2022.04.020 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“, 2019) and also maintenance treatment up to 48 weeks with intranasal esketamine (Wajs et al., 2020).”
BackgroundLan, X., Wang, C., Zhang, F., Liu, H., Li, W., Ye, Y., Hu, Z., Mai, S., Ning, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2023) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health · doi:10.1186/s13034-023-00647-2 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
“5 years) study of 1148 TRD patients treated with esketamine, indicating that cognitive performances, including attention, visual learning and memory, and executive function, the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, generally remained stable from baseline through week 160 after the same maintained therapy phrase (week…”
BackgroundIngrosso, G., Cleare, A. J., & Juruena, M. F. (2024) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/02698811241303597 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Managing Esketamine Treatment Frequency Toward Successful Outcomes: Analysis of Phase 3 Data
Nijs, M., Wajs, E., Aluisio, L. E., Turkoz, I., Daly, E., Janik, A., Borentain, S., Singh, J. B., DiBernardo, A., & Wiegand, F. (2020) · The International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1093/ijnp/pyaa027 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Self-citationOvercoming the myths of esketamine administration: different and not difficult
Buchmayer, F., & Kasper, S. F. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1279657 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Self-citationSartim, A. G., Marques, J., Silveira, K. M., Gobira, P. H., Guimarães, F. S., Wegener, G., & Joca, S. R. L. (2021) · Neuropharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.neuropharm.2021.108679 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Rizzo, A., Garçon-Poca, M. Z., Essmann, A., Souza, A. J., Michaelides, M., Ciruela, F., & Bonaventura, J. (2025) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-025-02931-3 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Ketamine and esketamine for crisis management in patients with depression: Why, whom, and how?
Lengvenytė, A., Strumila, R., Olié, É., & Courtet, P. (2022) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2022.02.004 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Kritzer, M. D., Pae, C., & Masand, P. S. (2022) · Expert Opinion on Drug Safety · doi:10.1080/14740338.2022.2069749 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“of recreational ketamine abuse [52]; though the same was initially said about opiate-based medications used for pain”
Neurocognitive effects of subanesthetic serial ketamine infusions in treatment resistant depression
Zavaliangos‐Petropulu, A., McClintock, S. M., Khalil, J., Joshi, S. H., Taraku, B., Al‐Sharif, N., Espinoza, R. T., & Narr, K. L. (2023) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2023.04.015 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Samalin, L., Mékaoui, L., Rothärmel, M., Sauvaget, A., Wicart, C., Dupin, J., Cohignac, V., & Gaudre-Wattinne, E. (2024) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1155/2024/7262794 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“…on the now established safety pro fi le of ESK after data collected during the previous phase III, IIIb, and long-term clinical trials [12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18], no new safety signals were observed over patient follow-up in the real-world ESKALE study (median treatment duration of 19.4 weeks).”
InfluentialClinical overview of NMDA-R antagonists and clinical practice
Davoudian, P. A., & Wilkinson, S. T. (2020) · Advances in Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/bs.apha.2020.04.004 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Self-citationRoxas, N., Ahuja, C., Isom, J., Wilkinson, S. T., & Capurso, N. A. (2021) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2020.20101480 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citationDijkstra, F. M., van de Loo, A. J. A. E., Abdulahad, S., Bosma, E. R., Hartog, M., Huls, H., Kuijper, D. C., de Vries, E., Solanki, B., Singh, J. B., et al. (2022) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/02698811221078764 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
“The 6-h timepoint for the driving test was chosen as it was expected that most AEs would be resolved by then (Daly et al., 2018; Popova et al., 2019; Wajs et al., 2020).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialSelf-citationLiu, P., Zhang, S., Liang, Y., Gao, Z., Gao, W., & Dong, B. (2022) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s388764 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Ketamine cystitis following ketamine therapy for treatment-resistant depression – case report
Chang, M., Juruena, M. F., & Young, A. H. (2024) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-05468-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Self-citationHecking, J., Davoudian, P. A., & Wilkinson, S. T. (2021) · Chronic Stress · doi:10.1177/24705470211020446 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
“2% maintained remission at study endpoint.(16) A long-term extension study of SUSTAIN-2 (SUSTAIN-3; NCT02782104) is ongoing, with plans to follow patients for several years.”
BackgroundSelf-citationOraee, S., Alinejadfard, M., Golsorkh, H., Sadeghian, M., Fanaei, M., Centis, R., D’Ambrosio, L., Sotgiu, G., Goudarzi, H., Migliori, G. B., et al. (2024) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.11.010 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Vanicek, T., Unterholzner, J., Lanzenberger, R., Naderi-Heiden, A., Kasper, S., & Praschak-rieder, N. (2022) · World Journal of Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/15622975.2022.2031287 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Wajs, E., Aluisio, L., Holder, R., Daly, E. J., Lane, R., Lim, P., George, J. E., Morrison, R. L., Sanacora, G., Young, A. H., Kasper, S., Sulaiman, A. H., Li, C.-T., Paik, J.-W., Manji, H., Hough, D., Grunfeld, J., Jeon, H. J., Wilkinson, S. T., Drevets, W. C., & Singh, J. B.
- Affiliations
- Janssen (Belgium) (BE)
- Janssen Research & Development (United States) (US)
- Janssen Canada (Canada) (CA)
- Yale University (US)
- King's College London (GB)
- Medical University of Vienna (AT)
- University of Malaya (MY)
- Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TW)
- Kyung Hee University (KR)
- Peninsula Health (AU)
- Samsung Medical Center (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Wajs, Ewa
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Physicians Postgraduate Press, Inc
- Published
- 2020-04-28
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 3
- ISSN
- 0160-6689 (ISSN-L)
- 1555-2101
- OpenAlex
- W3017383621
- Cited by
- 299
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 21.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- The University of Malaya Research Repository (University of Malaya) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Keywords
- esketamine, nasal spray, treatment-resistant depression, major depressive disorder, oral antidepressant, long-term safety, treatment-emergent adverse events, dissociation
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Intranasal, Administration, Oral, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antidepressive Agents, Cognition, Drug Therapy, Combination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-09-28.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-09-28.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review