Cited by 272Soil and Environmental StudiesPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsEarth Systems and Cosmic Evolution

The technofossil record of humans

Open access
Zalasiewicz, Jan, Williams, Mark, Waters, Colin N, Barnosky, Anthony D, Haff, Peter·2014·The Anthropocene Review

Abstract

As humans have colonised and modified the Earth’s surface, they have developed progressively more sophisticated tools and technologies. These underpin a new kind of stratigraphy, that we term technostratigraphy, marked by the geologically accelerated evolution and diversification of technofossils – the preservable material remains of the technosphere (Haff, 2013), driven by human purpose and transmitted cultural memory, and with the dynamics of an emergent system. The technosphere, present in some form for most of the Quaternary, shows several thresholds. Its expansion and transcontinental synchronisation in the mid 20th century has produced a global technostratigraphy that combines very high time-resolution, great geometrical complexity and wide (including transplanetary) extent. Technostratigraphy can help characterise the deposits of a potential Anthropocene Epoch and its emergence marks a step change in planetary mode.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2053019613514953

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Technofossils provide annual to decadal stratigraphic resolution, far greater than can be obtained from first and last appearances of fossil taxa.

    “these so-called technofossils ( 28 ) provide annual to decadal stratigraphic resolution ( 22, 19 ), far greater than can be obtained from first and last appearances of fossil taxa, which have traditionally provided the most common means of correlating stratal sections ( 29 ).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Wilkinson, I. P, Poirier, C., Head, M.J., Sayer C.D., Tibby, J. in press. Micropalaeontological signatures of the Anthropocene. In Waters, C.N., Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M. et al . (Eds.) A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene . Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ.
  2. Zalasiewicz, J., Williams M, & Waters C N. in press a. Can the Anthropocene Series be defined and recognized? In: A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene. Waters et al. (eds). Geological Society Special Publication.
  3. Zalasiewicz, J., Kryza, R. & Williams, M. in press b. The mineral signature of the Anthropocene. In: A Stratigraphical Basis for the Anthropocene. Waters et al . (eds).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Waters, C. N., Barnosky, A. D., & Haff, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • British Geological Survey (GB)
  • Museum of Vertebrate Zoology (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Venue
The Anthropocene Review
Published
2014-01-07
Volume
1
Issue
1
Pages
34-43
ISSN
  • 2053-0196 (ISSN-L)
  • 2053-020X
OpenAlex
W2161092780
Cited by
272
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8
FWCI
17.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Anthropocene Review (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Leicester Research Archive (University of Leicester) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (bgs05001)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
Keywords
technosphere, Anthropocene, anthropogenic landscapes, cultural memory, Quaternary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review