Cited by 318Geology and Paleoclimatology ResearchPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsSoil and Environmental Studies

A stratigraphical basis for the Anthropocene?

Waters, Colin N., Zalasiewicz, Jan A., Williams, Mark, Ellis, Michael A., Snelling, Andrea M.·2014·Geological Society, London, Special Publications

Abstract

Recognition of intimate feedback mechanisms linking changes across the atmosphere, biosphere, geosphere and hydrosphere demonstrates the pervasive nature of humankind's influence, perhaps to the point that we have fashioned a new geological epoch, the Anthropocene. To what extent will these changes be evident as long-lasting signatures in the geological record? To establish the Anthropocene as a formal chronostratigraphical unit it is necessary to consider a spectrum of indicators of anthropogenically induced environmental change, and to determine how these show as stratigraphic signals that can be used to characterize an Anthropocene unit and to recognize its base. It is important to consider these signals against a context of Holocene and earlier stratigraphic patterns. Here we review the parameters used by stratigraphers to identify chronostratigraphical units and how these could apply to the definition of the Anthropocene. The onset of the range of signatures is diachronous, although many show maximum signatures which post-date 1945, leading to the suggestion that this date may be a suitable age for the start of the Anthropocene.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1144/sp395.18

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waters, C. N., Zalasiewicz, J. A., Williams, M., Ellis, M. A., & Snelling, A. M.
Affiliations
  • British Geological Survey (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
Venue
Geological Society, London, Special Publications
Published
2014-01
Volume
395
Issue
1
Pages
1-21
ISSN
  • 0305-8719 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-4927
OpenAlex
W2164278327
Cited by
318
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 5
FWCI
24.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Geological Society London Special Publications (publishedVersion)
  • NERC Open Research Archive (Natural Environment Research Council) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Natural Environment Research Council (bgs05002)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil and Environmental Studies
Keywords
Anthropocene, chronostratigraphy, stratigraphic units, geological epochs, anthropogenic environmental change, stratigraphic markers, Holocene, anthropogenic impacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review