Cited by 103Hate Speech and Cyberbullying DetectionPopulism, Right-Wing MovementsSocial Media and Politics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessing the Extent and Types of Hate Speech in Fringe Communities: A Case Study of Alt-Right Communities on 8chan, 4chan, and Reddit

Open access

Abstract

Recent right-wing extremist terrorists were active in online fringe communities connected to the alt-right movement. Although these are commonly considered as distinctly hateful, racist, and misogynistic, the prevalence of hate speech in these communities has not been comprehensively investigated yet, particularly regarding more implicit and covert forms of hate. This study exploratively investigates the extent, nature, and clusters of different forms of hate speech in political fringe communities on Reddit, 4chan, and 8chan. To do so, a manual quantitative content analysis of user comments ( N = 6,000) was combined with an automated topic modeling approach. The findings of the study not only show that hate is prevalent in all three communities (24% of comments contained explicit or implicit hate speech), but also provide insights into common types of hate speech expression, targets, and differences between the studied communities.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20563051211052906

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Ben-David A., 2016, International Journal of Communication, 10, 1167
  2. Campbell J. C., 2003, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993
  3. Conway M., Macnair L., Scrivens R. (2019). Right-wing extremists’ persistent online presence: History and contemporary trends (pp. 1–24). International Centre for Counter-Terrorism (ICCT). https://icct.nl/app/uploads/2019/11/RWEXOnline-1.pdf
  4. Gagliardone I., 2015, Countering online hate speech
  5. Günther E., 2017, International Journal of Communication, 11, 3051
  6. Kümpel A. S., 2019, Wandel der Sprach- und Debattenkultur in sozialen Online-Medien. Ein Literaturüberblick zu Ursachen und Wirkungen von inziviler Kommunikation
  7. Meibauer J., 2013, Hassrede/Hate Speech. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zu einer aktuellen Diskussion, 1
  8. Nagle A., 2017, Kill all normies: The online culture wars from Tumblr and 4chan to the alt-right and Trump
  9. Sanchez B. C., 2020, Pathways: A Journal of Humanistic and Social Inquiry, 1, 1
  10. Wendling M., 2018, Alt-right: From 4chan to the White House

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–103 of 103

Metadata

Authors
Rieger, D., Kümpel, A. S., Wich, M., Kiening, T., & Groh, G.
Affiliations
  • Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Technical University of Munich (DE)
Venue
Social Media + Society
Published
2021-10
Volume
7
Issue
4
ISSN
2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3209715443
Cited by
102
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 14
FWCI
5.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Media + Society (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
hate speech, alt-right, 4chan, Reddit, right-wing extremism, implicit hate speech, online comments, topic modeling

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review