CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1Crime Patterns and InterventionsCriminal Justice and PenologyCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis

Assessments of Crime Seriousness on an American Indian Reservation: A Reanalysis of Abril (2007)

Greenberg, David F.·2012·Race and Justice
DOI 10.1177/2153368711436013
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Data from a survey of residents of a Southern Ute Indian reservation in Colorado carried out by Abril (2007) are used to compare perceptions of crime seriousness held by members of an American Indian tribe with those of non-Indians living on the same reservation. There are few significant or substantial differences between the two groups. These findings bear on debates in criminology and the sociology of law regarding the extent to which the content of the criminal law reflects a broad consensus in society or entails the imposition of rules made by and for dominant groups on subordinate groups holding different cultural values and norms. Additional data are deployed to assess subcultural explanations of high levels of interpersonal violence on American Indian reservations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2153368711436013

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies of Iranian students in 2002 and Native-Americans in 2001 found that homicide ranked as slightly more serious than rape.

    “Studies of Iranian students in 2002, and Native-Americans in 2001, found that homicide ranked as slightly more serious than rape (Greenberg, 2012;Serajzadeh, 2008).”

    From Rape or Homicide: Which Is Worse? (2024) · cites this paper as Greenberg, 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Authors
Greenberg, D. F.
Affiliations
New York University (US)
Corresponding author
Greenberg, David F.
ORCID
Greenberg, David F.
Venue
Race and Justice
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2012-01
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
29-41
ISSN
2153-3687 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1177/2153368711436013
OpenAlex
W2327397589
Cited by
1
References
39
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Race and Justice (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Keywords
Indian reservations, interpersonal violence, cultural values and norms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review