CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 273Assistive Technology in Communication and MobilityInclusion and Disability in Education and SportFamily and Disability Support Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assistive Technology Use and Stigma

Parette, Phil, Scherer, Marcia·2004·Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities
DOI 10.1177/215416470403900304
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Issues related to stigma and its impact on assistive technology (AT) use with persons having developmental disabilities are addressed. While stigma has been known to be associated with presence of disability for many years, relationship between stigma and AT usage, particularly when working with families across cultures, has only just begun to be examined. Issues confronted by AT decision-making teams related to stigma include family expectations of AT, visibility resulting from use of AT in public settings, and perceptions that children will not attain important developmental skills if they become reliant on devices. While numerous approaches for AT decision-making have been implemented in the field, absence of validity and reliability data related to such approaches emphasizes importance of understanding potential influences of stigma associated with AT use. Specific areas that can contribute to stigmatization include (a) device aesthetics/cosmesis, (b) gender and age appropriateness, (c) social acceptability, (d) sublimation and professional deference, (e) teachers and acceptance of disability, and (f) universal design principles. Importance of future research that explores stigma and government policy and impact on AT decision-making is noted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/215416470403900304

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Ballabio E., Moran R. Older people and people with disabilities in the information society: An RTD approach for the European UnionEuropean Commission DGXIII, Telecommunications, Information, Market and Exploitation of Research Brussels, Belgium1998
  2. Bauer W. M. Piazza J. G. Increasing access through assistive technology for people with disabilities in rural areas CSUN 1998 Annual Conference http://www.dinf.ne.jp/doc/english/Us_Eu/conf/csun_98/csun98_018.htmLos Angeles CA1998 March. March 12 2003
  3. Chambers A. C. Has technology been considered: A guide for IEP teamsCouncil for Exceptional Children Reston, VA1997
  4. Covington G. A. Gray D. B., Quatrano L. A., Lieberman M. L. Cultural and environmental barriers to assistive technology: Why assistive devices don't always assist Designing and using assistive technologyBrookes Baltimore77–881998
  5. Cowan D., Turner-Smith A.Centre for Rehabilitation and Engineering The role of assistive technology and alternative models of care for elderly peopleLondon; Kings College London1998
  6. Crocker J., Major B., Steele C. Gilbert D. T., Fiske S. T., Lindzet G. Social stigma Handbook of social psychologyMcGraw-Hill New York2504–5531998th ed
  7. Fewell R. R., Vadasy P. F. Families of handicapped childrenPRO-ED Austin, TX1986
  8. Gray D., Hahn H. Christiansen C., Baum C. Achieving occupational goals: The social effects of stigma Enabling function and well-beingSlack Thorofare, NJ393–4091997
  9. Haddle H. W. The modification of attitudes toward disabled persons: The case for using systematic desensitization as an attitude change strategy American Foundation for the Blind Research Bulletin 2898–1101974
  10. Harry B. Peterson R. L., Ishii-Jordan S. Behavior disorders in the context of family Multicultural issues in the education of students with behavioral disordersBrookline Cambridge, MA149–1611994
  11. Krefting L., Krefting D. Christiansen C., Baum C. Cultural influences on performance Overcoming human occupational performance deficitsSlack Thorofare, NJ101–1221991
  12. Lebbon C., Boess S. Wellbathingattitudes and well-being of older consumers in relation to bathing. Paper presented at the 3rd International TIDE Conference Quality of Life for the European CitizenHelsinki, Finland1998. June
  13. Lindsey J. D. Technology and exceptional individualsAustin, TX2000rd ed.
  14. Littrell J. L. Women with disabilities in community college computer training programs1991
  15. Murphy H. Proceedings of the sixth annual conference, technology and persons with disabilitiesCalifornia State University Northridge, CA; Northridge553–562
  16. Matlock B., Lynch V., Paeth M. A. Decision rules and strategies for skill generalization learners’ kitUniversity of Washington Press Seattle, WA1990
  17. Melichar J. F., Blackhurst A. E. Introduction to a functional approach to assistive technology1993Training ModuleLexington KY:Department of Special Education and Rehabilitation Counseling, University of Kentucky
  18. Nathanson R. (1982). Faculty attitudes and behavior toward physically disabled students: An exploratory/ descriptive study with proposals for faculty development programming. Dissertation Abstracts International, 44 (5), 1352A.
  19. Parette H. P., Stuart S., Huer M. B., Hoge D. R., Hostetler S., Dunn N., Brotherson M. J., Vanbiervliet A., Wommack J. Qualitative methodology and AAC decision-making with families across cultures Paper presented to the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Annual ConventionSeattle, WA1996, November
  20. Roseberry-Mckibbin C. Multicultural students with special language needsAcademic Communication Associates CA2002Oceanside
  21. Scherer M. J. Living in the state of stuck. How technology impacts the lives of people with disabilitiesBrookline Cambridge, MA2000rd ed.
  22. ceptions of mainstreaming/inclusion Exceptional Children 6359–72
  23. Watts E. H., O'brian M., Wojcik B. W. Assistive technology models for the consideration process and the features of educational assessment practices: A synthesis of the literature Journal of Special Education Technologyin press
  24. Zabala J. Ready SETT Go! Online workshop http://www2.edc.org/NCIP/Workshops/sett3/index.html1998 January 7 2003

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Parette, P., & Scherer, M.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Matching Person and Technology (US)
  • Illinois State University (US)
ORCID
Scherer, Marcia
Venue
Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2004-09
Volume
39
Issue
3
Pages
217-226
ISSN
1547-0350 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1177/215416470403900304
OpenAlex
W32337279
Cited by
272
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
FWCI
10.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Education and training in developmental disabilities (publishedVersion)
  • Education and training in developmental disabilities
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Assistive Technology in Communication and Mobility
  • Social Sciences › Education › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
assistive technology, stigma, developmental disabilities, family expectations, social acceptance, universal design, teacher attitudes, acceptance of disability, children with disabilities, cross-cultural families

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review