Cited by 47Berberine and alkaloids researchNatural Products and Biological ResearchLipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health

Efficacy of berberine alone and in combination for the treatment of hyperlipidemia: A systematic review

Open access
Koppen, Laura M., Whitaker, Andrea, Rosene, Audrey, Beckett, Robert D.·2017·Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine

Abstract

The objective of this review is to identify, summarize, and evaluate clinical trials of berberine for the treatment of hyperlipidemia and other dyslipidemias. A literature search for randomized, controlled trials of berberine that assessed at least 2 lipid values as endpoints resulted in identification of 12 articles that met criteria. The majority of evaluated articles consistently suggest that berberine has a beneficial effect on low-density lipoprotein (reductions ranging from approximately 20 to 50 mg/dL) and triglycerides (reductions ranging from approximately 25 to 55 mg/dL). Common study limitations included lack of reporting of precision in their endpoints, description of blinding, transparency in flow of patients, and reporting of baseline concomitant medications. Berberine could serve as an alternative for patients who are intolerant to statins, patients resistant to starting statin therapy but who are open to alternative treatments, and for low-risk patients not indicated for statin therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2156587216687695

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Prior reviews of berberine have limitations including that they included studies that did not make comparisons to placebo, compared berberine to diverse controls, assessed extracts from the barberry plant, or defined the intervention as combination nutraceutical products containing berberine.

    “Prior reviews of berberine have several limitations as they included studies that did not make comparisons to placebo, compared berberine to diverse controls (e.g., statins, oral hypoglycemics, lifestyle modification), assessed extracts from the barberry plant or defined the intervention as combination nutraceutical products containing berberine such as Armolipid Plus®.(7-13)”

    From Overall and sex-specific effect of berberine for dyslipidemia: systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials (2022) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Discussion and Data Synthesis (pages unavailable) show that this review included studies with non-placebo controls and combination products containing berberine, including Armolipid Plus. The cited review does not show that it assessed barberry-plant extracts or used lifestyle modification as a comparator. It also required a separate control group, though that control did not have to be placebo. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Koppen, L. M., Whitaker, A., Rosene, A., & Beckett, R. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University Health System (US)
  • Spectrum Health (US)
  • Manchester University (US)
Corresponding author
Beckett, Robert D.
Venue
Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine
Published
2017-01-16
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
956-968
ISSN
  • 1076-1675 (ISSN-L)
  • 2156-5872
  • 2156-5899
OpenAlex
W2577954573
Cited by
47
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Evidence-Based Complementary & Alternative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Berberine and alkaloids research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Natural Products and Biological Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
Keywords
berberine, hyperlipidemia, dyslipidemia, low-density lipoprotein, triglycerides, statin intolerance, lipid-lowering therapy, combination therapy
MeSH terms
Ezetimibe, Berberine, Biological Products, Clinical Trials as Topic, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Hyperlipidemias, Lipids, Male

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review