Cited by 65Emotional Intelligence and PerformanceTeam Dynamics and PerformanceJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Trait emotional intelligence and leadership self-efficacy: their relationship with collective efficacy

Open access
Villanueva, José J., Sánchez, José C.·2007·The Spanish Journal of Psychology

Abstract

In this article, a leadership model is presented, with which to investigate the relationship of trait emotional intelligence (trait EI), leadership self-efficacy and leader's task self-efficacy with collective task efficacy and group performance. The sample was made up of 217 undergraduate students, randomly assigned to work teams of 1 leader and 2 followers that were requested to perform a production task. An adapted version of the Schutte Self-Report Inventory (SSRI; Schutte et al., 1998) was used to measure trait EI. Structural equation modeling was used to test the hypothesized relationships. Results indicated that task self-efficacy was a mediator between leadership self-efficacy and collective task efficacy; the latter, in turn, was the best predictor of group performance. No significant relationship was found between trait EI and collective task efficacy although, unexpectedly, trait EI was positively associated with leadership self-efficacy. Implications of the results are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1138741600006612

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 69 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Bass, B.M. (1990). Bass and Stodgill's handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villanueva, J. J., & Sánchez, J. C.
Affiliations
Autonomous University of Tamaulipas (MX)
Venue
The Spanish Journal of Psychology
Published
2007-11
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
349-357
ISSN
  • 1138-7416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1988-2904
OpenAlex
W2104480433
Cited by
65
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Spanish Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Complutensian Scientific Journals (Complutense University of Madrid) (submittedVersion)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Emotional Intelligence and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
trait emotional intelligence, leadership self-efficacy, task self-efficacy, group performance, mediation, production tasks, undergraduate students
MeSH terms
Adult, Cooperative Behavior, Emotions, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Leadership, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review