Cited by 31Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Therapy and Development

An Upper Limit to Youth Psychotherapy Benefit? A Meta-Analytic Copula Approach to Psychotherapy Outcomes

Open access
Jones, Payton J., Mair, Patrick, Kuppens, Sofie, Weisz, John R.·2019·Clinical Psychological Science

Abstract

Across 50 years of research, extensive efforts have been made to improve the effectiveness of psychotherapies for children and adolescents. Yet recent evidence shows no significant improvement in youth psychotherapy outcomes. In other words, efforts to improve the general quality of therapy models do not appear to have translated directly into improved outcomes. We used multilevel meta-analytic data from 502 randomized controlled trials to generate a bivariate copula model predicting effect size as therapy quality approaches infinity. Our results suggest that even with a therapy of perfect quality, achieved effect sizes may be modest. If therapy quality and therapy outcome share a correlation of .20 (a somewhat optimistic assumption given the evidence we review), a therapy of perfect quality would produce an effect size of Hedges’s g = 0.83. We suggest that youth psychotherapy researchers complement their efforts to improve psychotherapy quality by investigating additional strategies for improving outcomes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2167702619858424

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analyses for the social sciences
  2. Hunsley J., Di Guilio G. (2002). Dodo bird, phoenix, or urban legend? Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice, 1, 11–22. Retrieved from https://www.srmhp.org/0101/psychotherapy-equivalence.html
  3. Nelsen R., 2007, An introduction to copulas
  4. Sklar M., 1959, Publications de l’Institut de Statistique de l’Universit, 8, 229

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, P. J., Mair, P., Kuppens, S., & Weisz, J. R.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Karel de Grote Hogeschool (BE)
Corresponding author
Jones, Payton J.
Venue
Clinical Psychological Science
Published
2019-08-06
Volume
7
Issue
6
Pages
1434-1449
ISSN
  • 2167-7026 (ISSN-L)
  • 2167-7034
OpenAlex
W2950878909
Cited by
31
References
73
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
5.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DGE1745303)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Therapy and Development
Keywords
adolescent psychotherapy, psychotherapy effectiveness, children and adolescents, psychotherapy outcome, randomized controlled trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review