The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessing the Impact of Psychological Readiness on Performance and Symmetry in Functional Testing After ACL Reconstruction in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients
Open accessAbstract
Background: Readiness for return to sports involves both physical and psychological aspects of recovery; however, the relationship between psychological and physical variables after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) is poorly understood. Hypothesis: ACLR patients with a higher psychological readiness would demonstrate better functional testing results at 6 months. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Participants were evaluated at 6 months after ACLR with various patient-reported outcome metrics: Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale, pediatric or adult International Knee Documentation Committee Questionnaire (IKDC), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) - Psychological Stress Experience and ACL - Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale. Functional testing included quadriceps, hamstrings, and gluteal strength testing; Y-balance test; single-leg single hop, crossover hop, and triple hop tests; and timed 6-m hop test. Pearson correlation coefficient and multivariable regression were used to determine associations between the limb symmetry index (LSI) on functional testing and patient-reported outcomes. Those with LSI deficits <20% (better performance) were compared with those with deficits >20% (worse performance). Results: A total of 229 participants (89 male, 140 female) with a median age of 17 years (range, 10.3-30.6 years) were enrolled. IKDC had a moderate negative correlation with PROMIS - Psychological Stress Experience ( r = -0.39; 95% CI = -0.49, -0.27; P < .001) and a moderate positive correlation with ACL-RSI ( r = 0.55; 95% CI = 0.46, 0.64; P < .001). A total of 151 patients completed functional testing. ACL-RSI demonstrated a positive correlation with single-hop LSI ( r = 0.21; 95% CI = 0.05, 0.35; P = .01) and timed 6-m hop ( r = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.42; P = .001). When adjusting for sex, age, and graft type, patients who had <20% deficit on the single-hop test scored 16.6 points higher on ACL-RSI ( P = .001), and those with <20% deficit on crossover hop testing scored a mean 13.9 points higher on ACL-RSI ( P = .04) Conclusion: Higher psychological readiness for return to sport was associated with better performance and greater symmetry on hop testing 6 months after ACLR, suggesting a potential link between physical and psychological recovery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Psychological barriers such as fear of reinjury persist even in athletes who meet physical recovery criteria.19”
From Determinants of Psychological Readiness to Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (2026) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 49
- 10.1177/0363546513489284 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0363546510384798 · DOI
- 10.1097/00003086-199006000-00028 · DOI
- 10.1177/1941738120912846 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.09.009 · DOI
- 10.1542/peds.2016-1877 · DOI
- 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.csm.2004.03.004 · DOI
- 10.2519/jospt.2008.2887 · DOI
- 10.1177/03635465231191778 · DOI
- 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.545526 · DOI
- 10.1007/s40279-019-01221-7 · DOI
- 10.2519/jospt.2018.8277 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0363546513518412 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0363546513496548 · DOI
- 10.1177/1941738114537594 · DOI
- 10.1177/03635465010290051301 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1123/jsr.6.3.256 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546510383002 · DOI
- 10.1097/JSM.0000000000000751 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00167-004-0591-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/bjsm.2007.044818 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.msksp.2017.03.011 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2011.01325.x · DOI
- 10.1177/2325967120982309 · DOI
- 10.1177/23259671211054804 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.asmr.2021.09.037 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546512456836 · DOI
- 10.1177/03635465221109607 · DOI
- 10.1177/23259671231166012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/036354659101900518 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546515589108 · DOI
- 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002353 · DOI
- 10.1123/tsp.2014-0063 · DOI
- 10.1002/pmrj.12815 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jsams.2017.09.336 · DOI
- 10.1177/1941738116685299 · DOI
- 10.1123/jsr.2017-0244 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ptsp.2020.05.007 · DOI
- 10.1123/jsr.2018-0272 · DOI
- 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001222 · DOI
- 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095898 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.ptsp.2007.09.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0363546513517540 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546518773757 · DOI
- 10.1177/0363546515621554 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0363546507301318 · DOI
- 10.5694/mja17.00974 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Murphy, T., Lyons, L., Mertz-Bynum, N., Lugin, A., Harkey, M. S., Kuenze, C., Baez, S., Myer, G. D., Diekfuss, J., & Petushek, E. (2026) · Journal of Athletic Training · doi:10.4085/1062-6050-0696.25
Metadata
- Authors
- Mercurio, A. M., Scott, E. J., Sugimoto, D., Christino, M. A., Coene, R. P., Gossman, E. C., Cook, D. L., Kocher, M. S., Kramer, D. E., Yen, Y.-M., Micheli, L. J., & Milewski, M. D.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Duke University (US)
- The Micheli Center for Sports Injury Prevention (US)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Milewski, Matthew D.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 23259671241274768-23259671241274768
- ISSN
- 2325-9671 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11445767
- OpenAlex
- W4402901176
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23K10672)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
- Keywords
- anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, psychological readiness, return to sport, limb symmetry index, functional testing, pediatric and adolescent patients, psychological stress, patient-reported outcomes, single-leg hop test, knee function, Y-balance test, IKDC score
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review