Cited by 30Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDigital Mental Health InterventionsStudent Stress and Coping

The Effects of Internet-Delivered Mindfulness Training on Stress, Coping, and Mindfulness in University Students

Open access
Messer, David, Horan, John J., Turner, Wesley, Weber, Wanda·2016·AERA Open

Abstract

Internet-delivered mindfulness and relaxation training were compared with each other and a no-treatment control on stress, coping, and mindfulness measures. Participants ( n = 114) were assessed before and after treatment, and their compliance with the intervention they received was tracked. The treatments were received at a time, place, and computer of the participants’ choosing with the proviso that three exercises be completed during each of three successive weeks. Both mindfulness and relaxation reduced stress, but only mindfulness training increased mindfulness and reduced emotion-focused coping.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/2332858415625188

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. CAS professional standards for high education (8th ed.). (2012). Washington, DC: Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education.
  2. Glass, D. C., & Singer, J. E. (1972). Urban stress . New York, NY: Academic Press.
  3. Segal, Z., Williams, J. M. G., & Teasdale, J. D. (2002). Mindfulnessbased cognitive therapy for depression: A new approach for preventing relapse . New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  4. Springer, F., & Phillips, J. L. (2006). The IOM model: A tool for prevention planning and implementation. Prevention Tactics , 8 (13), 1-7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Messer, D., Horan, J. J., Turner, W., & Weber, W.
Affiliations
  • Arizona State University (US)
  • Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Venue
AERA Open
Published
2015-12-30
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
2332-8584 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2346559846
Cited by
30
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • AERA Open (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Arizona State University Library Digital Repository (Arizona State University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
relaxation training, stress, coping, emotion-focused coping, mindfulness, university students, intervention adherence, online psychological intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review