The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Men Set Their Own Cites High: Gender and Self-citation across Fields and over Time
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
How common is self-citation in scholarly publication, and does the practice vary by gender? Using novel methods and a data set of 1.5 million research papers in the scholarly database JSTOR published between 1779 and 2011, the authors find that nearly 10 percent of references are self-citations by a paper’s authors. The findings also show that between 1779 and 2011, men cited their own papers 56 percent more than did women. In the last two decades of data, men self-cited 70 percent more than women. Women are also more than 10 percentage points more likely than men to not cite their own previous work at all. While these patterns could result from differences in the number of papers that men and women authors have published rather than gender-specific patterns of self-citation behavior, this gender gap in self-citation rates has remained stable over the last 50 years, despite increased representation of women in academia. The authors break down self-citation patterns by academic field and number of authors and comment on potential mechanisms behind these observations. These findings have important implications for scholarly visibility and cumulative advantage in academic careers.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, female academics tend to use more modest language in presenting their work in paper abstracts compared to men25,28, engage less in self-citation behavior39 and are less likely to promote their papers on social media40.”
From Scientific publications that use promotional language in the abstract receive more citations and public attention (2025) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks
Barabási, A.-L., & Albert, R. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509 · Cited by 36,135
The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered.
Merton, R. K. (1968) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.159.3810.56 · Cited by 6,720
The structure of scientific collaboration networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.404 · Cited by 4,550
Price, D. J. D. S. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.149.3683.510 · Cited by 3,205
Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1211286109 · Cited by 3,150
Women, Minorities, and Persons with Disabilities in Science and Engineering: 2013
National Science Foundation (2013) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e558442013-001 · Cited by 2,494
Community detection algorithms: A comparative analysis
Lancichinetti, A., & Fortunato, S. (2009) · Physical Review E · doi:10.1103/physreve.80.056117 · Cited by 2,181
A general theory of bibliometric and other cumulative advantage processes
Price, D. J. D. S. (1976) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/asi.4630270505 · Cited by 2,013
Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations
Barabási, A. L., Jeong, H., Néda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., & Vicsek, T. (2002) · Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications · doi:10.1016/s0378-4371(02)00736-7 · Cited by 1,972
Ridgeway, C. L. (2011) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755776.001.0001 · Cited by 1,527
Rudman, L. A. (1998) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.629 · Cited by 1,511
Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science
Larivière, V., Ni, C., Gingras, Y., Cronin, B., & Sugimoto, C. R. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/504211a · Cited by 1,499
The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property
Merton, R. K. (1988) · Isis · doi:10.1086/354848 · Cited by 1,397
Penalties for Success: Reactions to Women Who Succeed at Male Gender-Typed Tasks.
Heilman, M. E., Wallen, A. S., Fuchs, D., & Tamkins, M. M. (2004) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.416 · Cited by 1,390
Rudman, L. A., Moss‐Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Nauts, S. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008 · Cited by 1,336
Gender and the Career Choice Process: The Role of Biased Self‐Assessments
Correll, S. J. (2001) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/321299 · Cited by 1,320
Self-citationGender, Status, and Leadership
Ridgeway, C. L. (2001) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00233 · Cited by 1,270
Structural Cohesion and Embeddedness: A Hierarchical Concept of Social Groups
Moody, J. W., & White, D. R. (2003) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/3088904 · Cited by 1,179
Why Status Matters for Inequality
Ridgeway, C. L. (2013) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122413515997 · Cited by 1,042
The Matthew Matilda Effect in Science
Rossiter, M. W. (1993) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631293023002004 · Cited by 1,013
Constraints into Preferences: Gender, Status, and Emerging Career Aspirations
Correll, S. J. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900106 · Cited by 934
Self-citationThe Role of Gender in Scholarly Authorship
West, J. D., Jacquet, J., King, M. M., Correll, S. J., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0066212 · Cited by 897
Self-citationHow stereotypes impair women’s careers in science
Reuben, E., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1314788111 · Cited by 831
Problems of citation analysis: A critical review
MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science · doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(198909)40:5 · Cited by 807
The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations
Maliniak, D., Powers, R., & Walter, B. F. (2013) · International Organization · doi:10.1017/s0020818313000209 · Cited by 749
When men break the gender rules: Status incongruity and backlash against modest men.
Moss‐Racusin, C. A., Phelan, J. E., & Rudman, L. A. (2010) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/a0018093 · Cited by 596
Sex Differences in Research Productivity: New Evidence about an Old Puzzle
Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2657505 · Cited by 587
Professional Role Confidence and Gendered Persistence in Engineering
Cech, E. A., Rubineau, B., Silbey, S. S., & Seron, C. (2011) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122411420815 · Cited by 548
Gender, Family Characteristics, and Publication Productivity among Scientists
Fox, M. F. (2005) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312705046630 · Cited by 490
Adam, D. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415726a · Cited by 447
Citation Statistics from 110 Years of Physical Review
Redner, S. (2005) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.1996475 · Cited by 426
Rosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018209 · Cited by 389
Self-citationGender Differences in Publication Output: Towards an Unbiased Metric of Research Performance
Symonds, M. R. E., Gemmell, N. J., Braisher, T. L., Gorringe, K. L., & Elgar, M. A. (2006) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000127 · Cited by 363
Not by Productivity Alone: How Visibility and Specialization Contribute to Academic Earnings
Leahey, E. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200403 · Cited by 356
Measures of Sex Differences in Scientific Productivity
Long, J. S. (1992) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/71.1.159 · Cited by 326
Gender Differences in Productivity
Leahey, E. (2006) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/0891243206293030 · Cited by 317
Self‐citation and self‐reference: Credibility and promotion in academic publication
Hyland, K. (2003) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.10204 · Cited by 303
Child Care, Research Collaboration, and Gender Differences in Scientific Productivity
Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996) · Science Technology & Human Values · doi:10.1177/016224399602100103 · Cited by 297
Gender differences in research collaboration
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2013) · Journal of Informetrics · doi:10.1016/j.joi.2013.07.002 · Cited by 272
WOMEN, SCIENCE, AND ACADEMIA: Graduate Education and Careers
FOX, M. F. (2001) · Gender & Society · doi:10.1177/089124301015005002 · Cited by 268
Bozeman, B. L., & Gaughan, M. (2011) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2011.07.002 · Cited by 264
Quality of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the beholder
Handley, I. M., Brown, E. R., Moss‐Racusin, C. A., & Smith, J. L. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1510649112 · Cited by 259
Smalheiser, N. R., & Torvik, V. I. (2009) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.2009.1440430113 · Cited by 254
Gender and Entrepreneurship as a Career Choice
Thébaud, S. (2010) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0190272510377882 · Cited by 233
Fowler, J. H., & Aksnes, D. W. (2007) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-007-1777-2 · Cited by 219
Gender differences in scientific productivity: a persisting phenomenon?
van Arensbergen, P., van der Weijden, I., & van den Besselaar, P. (2012) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-012-0712-y · Cited by 214
Which gender gap? Factors affecting researchers’ scientific impact in science and medicine
Beaudry, C., & Larivière, V. (2016) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2016.05.009 · Cited by 185
Ledin, A., Bornmann, L., Gannon, F., & Wallon, G. (2007) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/sj.embor.7401109 · Cited by 171
Gender Prediction Methods Based on First Names with genderizeR
Wais, K. (2016) · The R Journal · doi:10.32614/rj-2016-002 · Cited by 169
Differences in Collaboration Patterns across Discipline, Career Stage, and Gender
Zeng, X. H. T., Duch, J., Sales‐Pardo, M., Moreira, J. A. G., Radicchi, F., Ribeiro, H. V., Woodruff, T. K., & Amaral, L. A. N. (2016) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002573 · Cited by 157
Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989)
Snyder, H., & Bonzi, S. (1998) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/016555159802400606 · Cited by 150
Šubelj, L., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0154404 · Cited by 142
The Gender Gap in Citations: Does It Persist?
Ferber, M. A., & Brün, M. (2011) · Feminist Economics · doi:10.1080/13545701.2010.541857 · Cited by 112
Solving the Productivity and Impact Puzzle: Do Men Outperform Women, or are Metrics Biased?
Cameron, E. Z., White, A. M., & Gray, M. E. (2016) · BioScience · doi:10.1093/biosci/biv173 · Cited by 111
Nonuniversal power law scaling in the probability distribution of scientific citations
Peterson, G. J., Pressé, S., & Dill, K. A. (2010) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1010757107 · Cited by 109
The Instability of Androgynous Names: The Symbolic Maintenance of Gender Boundaries
Lieberson, S., Dumais, S. A., & Baumann, S. (2000) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/210431 · Cited by 107
West, J. D., Jensen, M. C., Dandrea, R. J., Gordon, G., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2013) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22790 · Cited by 92
Self-citationBARNETT, R. C., Carr, P. L., Boisnier, A. D., Ash, A. S., Friedman, R. H., Moskowitz, M. A., & Szalacha, L. A. (1998) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/00001888-199802000-00017 · Cited by 82
Exploring the limits of community detection strategies in complex networks
Aldecoa, R., & Marı́n, I. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep02216 · Cited by 72
Self-Citation in Archaeology: Age, Gender, Prestige, and the Self
Hutson, S. R. (2006) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-006-9001-5 · Cited by 64
Ferrara, E., & Romero, A. E. (2013) · Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.22976 · Cited by 62
Author‐rated importance of cited references in biology and psychology publications
Tang, R., & Safer, M. A. (2008) · Journal of Documentation · doi:10.1108/00220410810858047 · Cited by 51
The Psychology of Referencing in Psychology Journal Articles
Safer, M. A., & Tang, R. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01104.x · Cited by 38
Cultural Correlates of Gender Integration in Science
Cain, C., & Leahey, E. (2014) · Gender Work and Organization · doi:10.1111/gwao.12052 · Cited by 32
King, E. (1773) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rstl.1773.0030 · Cited by 1
IV. Account of a petrefaction found on the coast of East Lothian
King, E. (1779) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London · doi:10.1098/rstl.1779.0005 · Cited by 1
Research works printed but not linked: 9
- Babcock Linda, 2007, Women Don’t Ask: The High Cost of Avoiding Negotiation—and Positive Strategies for Change
- Babcock Linda, 2003, Harvard Business Review
- Cole Jonathan R., 1991, The Outer Circle: Women in the Scientific Community, 277
- Hill Catherine, 2010, Why So Few? Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
- Kanter Rosabeth Moss, 1993, Men and Women of the Corporation
- 10.2307/2579971 · DOI
- 10.1177/000312240306800105 · DOI
- Weisshaar Kate, Social Forces
- Wesley-Smith Ian, 2016, Presented at WSDM Conference: Entity Ranking Challenge Workshop
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time
Park, M., Leahey, E., & Funk, R. J. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x · Cited by 899
The extent and drivers of gender imbalance in neuroscience reference lists
Dworkin, J. D., Linn, K. A., Teich, E. G., Zurn, P., Shinohara, R. T., & Bassett, D. S. (2020) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-020-0658-y · Cited by 543
Gendered Citation Patterns across Political Science and Social Science Methodology Fields
Dion, M. L., Sumner, J. L., & Mitchell, S. M. (2018) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2018.12 · Cited by 523
Swedberg, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108762519.002 · Cited by 471
Gender bias in academia: A lifetime problem that needs solutions
Llorens, A., Tzovara, A., Bellier, L., Bhaya-Grossman, I., Bidet‐Caulet, A., Chang, W. K., Cross, Z. R., Dominguez-Faus, R., Flinker, A., Fonken, Y. M., et al. (2021) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2021.06.002 · Cited by 427
Metadata
- Authors
- King, M. M., Bergstrom, C. T., Correll, S. J., Jacquet, J., & West, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Stanford University (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- King, Molly M.
- Venue
- Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-01-01
- Volume
- 3
- ISSN
- 2378-0231 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2466144917
- Cited by
- 275
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 25.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Scholar Commons (Santa Clara University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Psychology Research and Bibliometrics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web visibility and informetrics
- Keywords
- self-citation, gender gap, women in academia, Matthew effect, research visibility, academic careers, gender and science, field of study, number of authors, JSTOR
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
