CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 11Historical and Cultural Archaeology StudiesRace, History, and American SocietyArchaeology and Cultural Heritage

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Public Archaeology and Critical Histories: Collaborative Archaeology in Southern Illinois

Morris, Annelise·2014·Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage
DOI 10.1179/2161944114z.00000000017
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article considers how historical archaeologists and scholars of African-American heritage can work to decolonize existing historical narratives about our communities. I discuss an archaeological and historical work on a farmstead in rural southern Illinois, occupied by my African-American ancestors from the early nineteenth century onward. This project’s goals are multi-faceted. I seek to contribute to the often-invisible histories of Black pioneers, and to undertake an excavation open to the public, aided by community participation, and centered on community members’ questions about the area’s past. While my professional research questions focus on examining the material residues of changing processes of racialization in the nineteenth century, as a stakeholder and community member my research goals focus on making archaeological history accessible to a rural community.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1179/2161944114z.00000000017

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Douglass, Frederick. 1960.Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass:An American Slave. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.
  2. hooks bell, 1990, Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics
  3. Little BarbaraJ, 2002, Archaeology as a Shared Vision
  4. Moe Jeanne, 2002, Project Archaeology: Putting the Intrigue of the Past in Public Education
  5. Praetzellis Adrian, 2002, Neat Stuff and Good Stories: Interpreting Historical Archaeology in Two Local Communities
  6. Sheptak Russell, Joyce Rosemary, and Blaisdell-Sloan Kira. 2011. Pragmatic Choices, Colonial Lives: Resistance, Ambivalence, and Appropriation in Northern Honduras. InEnduring Conquests: Rethinking the Archaeology of Resistance to Spanish Colonialism in the Americas, edited by Mathew M. Liebmann and Melissa S. Murphy, 149–172. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School for Advanced Research Press.
  7. Wilkie Laurie, 2001, Black Sharecroppers and White Frat Boys: Living Communities and the Construction of their Archaeological Pasts

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Morris, A.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Morris, Annelise
Venue
Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2014-10-07
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
159-174
ISSN
  • 2161-9441 (ISSN-L)
  • 2161-9468
DOI
10.1179/2161944114z.00000000017
OpenAlex
W2154146306
Cited by
11
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of African Diaspora Archaeology and Heritage (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology (arts and humanities) › Archaeology and Cultural Heritage
Keywords
public archaeology, collaborative archaeology, African American heritage, Black pioneers, farmstead, racialization, 19th century, community participation, open excavation, African diaspora

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review