Cited by 392Building materials and conservationMetal Extraction and BioleachingGeochemistry and Elemental Analysis

Fungal involvement in bioweathering and biotransformation of rocks and minerals

Burford, E. P., Fomina, M., Gadd, G. M.·2003·Mineralogical Magazine

Abstract

Abstract In the Earth’s lithosphere, fungi are of fundamental importance as decomposer organisms, animal and plant pathogens and symbionts (e.g. lichens and mycorrhizas), being ubiquitous in sub-aerial and subsoil environments. The ability of fungi to interact with minerals, metals, metalloids and organic compounds through biomechanical and biochemical processes, makes them ideally suited as biological weathering agents of rock and building stone. They also play a fundamental role in biogeochemical cycling of nutrients, (e.g. C, N, P and S) and metals (e.g. Na, Mg, Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, Zn, Co and Ni) essential for the growth of living organisms in the biosphere. In addition they play an integral role in the mobilization and immobilization of non-essential metals (e.g. Cs, Al, Cd, Hg and Pb). Most studies on mineral-microbe interactions and microbial involvement in geological processes have concentrated on bacteria and archaea (Prokaryota): fungi (Eukaryota) have, to a certain extent, been neglected. This article addresses the role of fungi in geomicrobiological processes, emphasizing their deteriorative potential on rock, building stone and mineral surfaces and involvement in the formation of secondary mycogenic minerals. Such roles of fungi are also of importance for the global carbon reservoir and have potential biotechnological applications, e.g. in the bioremediation of xenobiotic-, metal- and/or radionuclide-contaminated soils and wastes, and metal/radionuclide recovery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1180/0026461036760154

Cites

234 of 234 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several studies have demonstrated enhanced dissolution of serpentine and olivine by microbes mainly through the production of organic acids.

    “Several studies have demonstrated enhanced dissolution of serpentine and olivine by microbes mainly through the production of organic acids (e.g., [56][57][58]).”

    From Strategizing carbon-neutral mines: A case for pilot projects (2014) · cites this paper as [58]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 236 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burford, E. P., Fomina, M., & Gadd, G. M.
Affiliations
University of Dundee (GB)
Venue
Mineralogical Magazine
Published
2003-12
Volume
67
Issue
6
Pages
1127-1155
ISSN
  • 0026-461X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-8022
OpenAlex
W2106222412
Cited by
392
References
236
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 17
FWCI
19.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Mineralogical Magazine (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Earth-Surface Processes › Building materials and conservation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Metal Extraction and Bioleaching
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Geochemistry and Petrology › Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis
Keywords
fungi, bioweathering, biotransformation, rock weathering, building stone deterioration, mineral-microbe interactions, metal mobilization, metal immobilization, biogeochemical cycles, bioremediation, radionuclide recovery, metal recovery, geomicrobiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review