The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Flow cytometric immunophenotyping for hematologic neoplasms
Abstract
Flow cytometric immunophenotyping remains an indispensable tool for the diagnosis, classification, staging, and monitoring of hematologic neoplasms. The last 10 years have seen advances in flow cytometry instrumentation and availability of an expanded range of antibodies and fluorochromes that have improved our ability to identify different normal cell populations and recognize phenotypic aberrancies, even when present in a small proportion of the cells analyzed. Phenotypically abnormal populations have been documented in many hematologic neoplasms, including lymphoma, chronic lymphoid leukemias, plasma cell neoplasms, acute leukemia, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, mast cell disease, myelodysplastic syndromes, and myeloproliferative disorders. The past decade has also seen refinement of the criteria used to identify distinct disease entities with widespread adoption of the 2001 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. This classification endorses a multiparametric approach to diagnosis and outlines the morphologic, immunophenotypic, and genotypic features characteristic of each disease entity. When should flow cytometric immunophenotyping be applied? The recent Bethesda International Consensus Conference on flow cytometric immunophenotypic analysis of hematolymphoid neoplasms made recommendations on the medical indications for flow cytometric testing. This review discusses how flow cytometric testing is currently applied in these clinical situations and how the information obtained can be used to direct other testing.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Döhner, H., Estey, E. H., Amadori, S., Appelbaum, F. R., Büchner, T., Burnett, A. K., Dombret, H., Fenaux, P., Grimwade, D., Larson, R. A., et al. (2010) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2009-07-235358 · Cited by 3,373
Data-Driven Phenotypic Dissection of AML Reveals Progenitor-like Cells that Correlate with Prognosis
Levine, J. H., Simonds, E. F., Bendall, S. C., Davis, K. L., Amir, E.-A. D., Tadmor, M. D., Litvin, O., Fienberg, H. G., Jager, A., Zunder, E. R., et al. (2015) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2015.05.047 · Cited by 2,303
on behalf of the EuroFlow Consortium (EU-FP6, L.-C.-2.-0., van Dongen, J. J. M., Lhermitte, L., Böttcher, S., Almeida, J., van der Velden, V. H. J., Flores-Montero, J., Rawstron, A., Asnafi, V, Lécrevisse, Q., et al. (2012) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2012.120 · Cited by 934
EuroFlow standardization of flow cytometer instrument settings and immunophenotyping protocols
on behalf of the EuroFlow Consortium (EU-FP6, L.-C.-2.-0., Kalina, T., Flores-Montero, J., van der Velden, V. H. J., Martin-Ayuso, M., Böttcher, S., Ritgen, M., Almeida, J., Lhermitte, L., Asnafi, V, et al. (2012) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2012.122 · Cited by 783
A deep profiler's guide to cytometry
Bendall, S. C., Nolan, G. P., Roederer, M., & Chattopadhyay, P. K. (2012) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2012.02.010 · Cited by 656
Metadata
- Authors
- Craig, F. E., & Foon, K. A.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2008-04-15
- Volume
- 111
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 3941-3967
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2166355785
- Cited by
- 672
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 41.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Flow cytometric immunophenotyping for hematologic neoplasms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2007-11-120535
- The paper
- Craig, F. E., & Foon, K. A. (2008). Flow cytometric immunophenotyping for hematologic neoplasms. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2007-11-120535
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.