Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 411

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The prevalence of quadriceps weakness in COPD and the relationship with disease severity

Seymour, J.M., Spruit, M.A., Hopkinson, N.S., Natanek, S.A., Man, W.D-C., Jackson, A., Gosker, H.R., Schols, A.M.W.J., Moxham, J., Polkey, M.I., Wouters, E.F.M.·2010·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Quadriceps strength relates to exercise capacity and prognosis in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We wanted to quantify the prevalence of quadriceps weakness in COPD and hypothesised that it would not be restricted to patients with severe airflow obstruction or dyspnoea. Predicted quadriceps strength was calculated using a regression equation (incorporating age, sex, height and fat-free mass), based on measurements from 212 healthy subjects. The prevalence of weakness (defined as observed values 1.645 standardised residuals below predicted) was related to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage and Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnoea score in two cohorts of stable COPD outpatients recruited from the UK (n = 240) and the Netherlands (n = 351). 32% and 33% of UK and Dutch COPD patients had quadriceps weakness. A significant proportion of patients in GOLD stages 1 and 2, or with an MRC dyspnoea score of 1 or 2, had quadriceps weakness (28 and 26%, respectively). These values rose to 38% in GOLD stage 4, and 43% in patients with an MRC Score of 4 or 5. Quadriceps weakness was demonstrable in one-third of COPD patients attending hospital respiratory outpatient services. Quadriceps weakness exists in the absence of severe airflow obstruction or breathlessness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00104909

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 1999, Skeletal muscle dysfunction in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. A statement of the American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 159, S1
  2. 10.1164/ajrccm.153.3.8630582 · DOI
  3. 10.1183/09031936.97.10020417 · DOI
  4. 10.1136/thorax.58.8.665 · DOI
  5. 10.1183/09031936.01.17509390 · DOI
  6. 10.7861/clinmedicine.6-2-190 · DOI
  7. 10.1136/bmj.2.5147.257 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.rmed.2007.07.003 · DOI
  9. 10.1136/thx.47.2.70 · DOI
  10. 10.1136/thx.2006.062026 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Edwards, 1977, Human skeletal muscle function: Description of tests and normal values, Clin Sci Mol Med, 52, 283
  12. 10.1164/ajrccm.150.1.8025735 · DOI
  13. 10.1164/rccm.200304-578OC · DOI
  14. 10.1136/thx.2008.103986 · DOI
  15. 10.1183/09031936.00074008 · DOI
  16. 10.1152/japplphysiol.00025.2007 · DOI
  17. 10.1183/09031936.02.00279602 · DOI
  18. 10.1183/09031936.05.00034905 · DOI
  19. 10.1183/09031936.05.00035005 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Engelen, 2000, Skeletal muscle weakness is associated with wasting of extremity fat-free mass but not with airflow obstruction in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Am J Clin Nutr, 71, 733, 10.1093/ajcn/71.3.733 · DOI
  21. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4598(199605)19:5<549::AID-MUS1>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI
  22. 10.1378/chest.123.4.1104 · DOI
  23. 10.1164/rccm.200506-969OC · DOI
  24. 10.1164/ajrccm/147.5.1151 · DOI
  25. 10.1164/rccm.200707-1011OC · DOI
  26. 10.1378/chest.07-2655 · DOI
  27. 10.1111/j.1748-1716.2007.01721.x · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1007/s00421-008-0792-9 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1378/chest.07-1592 · DOI
  30. 10.1186/1465-9921-8-25 · DOI
  31. 10.1164/ajrccm.158.2.9711023 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.1183/09031936.04.00139003 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Seymour, J. M., Spruit, M. A., Hopkinson, N. S., Natanek, S. A., Man, W. D.-C., Jackson, A., Gosker, H. R., Schols, A. M. W. J., Moxham, J., Polkey, M. I., & Wouters, E. F. M.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2009-11-06
Volume
36
Issue
1
Pages
81-88
ISSN
  • 0903-1936
  • 1399-3003
Cited by
411
References
7
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.