Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 351

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Detection of expiratory flow limitation in COPD using the forced oscillation technique

Open access
Dellacà, R.L., Santus, P., Aliverti, A., Stevenson, N., Centanni, S., Macklem, P.T., Pedotti, A., Calverley, P.M.A.·2004·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Expiratory flow limitation (EFL) during tidal breathing is a major determinant of dynamic hyperinflation and exercise limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Current methods of detecting this are either invasive or unsuited to following changes breath-by-breath. It was hypothesised that tidal flow limitation would substantially reduce the total respiratory system reactance (X rs) during expiration, and that this reduction could be used to reliably detect if EFL was present. To test this, 5‐Hz forced oscillations were applied at the mouth in seven healthy subjects and 15 COPD patients (mean±sd forced expiratory volume in one second was 36.8±11.5 % predicted) during quiet breathing. COPD breaths were analysed (n=206) and classified as flow-limited if flow decreased as alveolar pressure increased, indeterminate if flow decreased at constant alveolar pressure, or nonflow-limited. Of these, 85 breaths were flow-limited, 80 were not and 41 were indeterminate. Among other indices, mean inspiratory minus mean expiratory X rs(Δ Xrs) and minimum expiratory X rs(X exp,min) identified flow-limited breaths with 100% specificity and sensitivity using a threshold between 2.53–3.12 cmH 2 O·s·L−1(Δ Xrs) and −7.38– −6.76 cmH 2 O·s·L−1(X exp,min) representing 6.0% and 3.9% of the total range of values respectively. No flow-limited breaths were seen in the normal subjects by either method. Within-breath respiratory system reactance provides an accurate, reliable and noninvasive technique to detect expiratory flow limitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.04.00046804

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 351

Metadata

Authors
Dellacà, R. L., Santus, P., Aliverti, A., Stevenson, N., Centanni, S., Macklem, P. T., Pedotti, A., & Calverley, P. M. A.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2004-02
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
232-240
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2160808191
Cited by
351
References
20
FWCI
4.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Detection of expiratory flow limitation in COPD using the forced oscillation technique. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.04.00046804
The paper
Dellacà, R. L., Santus, P., Aliverti, A., Stevenson, N., Centanni, S., Macklem, P. T., Pedotti, A., & Calverley, P. M. A. (2004). Detection of expiratory flow limitation in COPD using the forced oscillation technique. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.04.00046804

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.