Cited by 52Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Cost-effectiveness of memantine in moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease patients receiving donepezil

Weycker, Derek, Taneja, Charu, Edelsberg, John, Haim Erder, M., Schmitt, Frederick A., Setyawan, Juliana, Oster, Gerry·2007·Current Medical Research and Opinion

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of memantine in patients with moderate-to-severe Alzheimer's disease (AD) receiving stable doses of donepezil were recently demonstrated in a phase III trial. The cost-effectiveness of such therapy is unknown. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A microsimulation model was developed to depict AD progression over time and associated clinical and economic outcomes. AD progression was measured in terms of decline in cognitive function, as assessed by the Severe Impairment Battery (SIB). At model entry, patients were assumed to have moderate-to-severe AD, to be on stable doses of donepezil, and to begin combination therapy with memantine, or continue to receive donepezil alone; duration of therapy was assumed to be 1 year. Drug efficacy was based on data from a phase III trial. Key assumptions of the model included: (1) efficacy of study drugs would extend to 1 year; (2) measures of cognitive function could be mapped to one another, as well as to global measures of disease severity; and (3) following therapy discontinuation, cognitive function would revert immediately to natural history levels. Cost-effectiveness was assessed in terms of cost (2005 US$) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained over a lifetime (3% discount rate). RESULTS: SIB scores were estimated to improve by 3.3 over 1 year from therapy with memantine plus donepezil (vs. donepezil alone). While pharmacotherapy costs were estimated to increase by $1250 during the year of memantine treatment, costs of formal and informal services were estimated to decrease by $1240 over this period and by $1493 (discounted present value) over a lifetime. Findings were sensitive to the assumed SIB score at therapy initiation; cost-effectiveness was better for patients with higher initial SIB scores (i.e., less severe disease). CONCLUSION: In patients with moderate-to-severe AD already receiving donepezil, treatment with memantine results in improved clinical outcomes and reduced total costs of care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1185/030079907x188071

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Therapies that minimize caregiver burden and delay nursing home entry translate into significant benefits related to worker productivity and health care savings.

    “From a public health and economics perspective, therapies that minimize caregiver burden and delay nursing home entry translate into significant benefits related to worker productivity and health care savings.66,[73][74][75]”

    From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [73]

  • In moderate and severe AD, short-term efficacy of memantine monotherapy compared with placebo is reported in several randomized controlled trials of 12 to 50 weeks duration and supported by meta-analyses.

    “In moderate and severe AD, short-term efficacy of memantine monotherapy compared with placebo is reported in several RCTs of 12 to 50 weeks duration and supported by meta-analyses.”

    From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [73]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weycker, D., Taneja, C., Edelsberg, J., Haim Erder, M., Schmitt, F. A., Setyawan, J., & Oster, G.
Affiliations
  • Policy Analysis (United States) (US)
  • Forest Laboratories, Inc., New York, New York, USA
  • University of Kentucky (US)
  • Forest Laboratories (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Weycker, Derek
Venue
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2007-04-20
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
1187-1197
ISSN
  • 0300-7995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4877
OpenAlex
W2110353868
Cited by
52
References
28
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Medical Research and Opinion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Myriad Genetics
  • Forest Laboratories
  • National Institute on Aging (R01AG019241, P50AG005144, P50AG-05144, R01 AG19241)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
memantine, donepezil, Alzheimer's disease, cost-effectiveness, combination therapy, microsimulation model, Severe Impairment Battery, cognitive decline, quality-adjusted life years, care costs, disease progression
MeSH terms
Donepezil, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Indans, Male, Memantine, Piperidines, Models, Econometric, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review