Cited by 57Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The Pharmacoeconomics of Cognitive Enhancers in Moderate to Severe Alzheimerʼs Disease

Cappell, Jaclyn, Herrmann, Nathan, Cornish, Stephen, Lanctôt, Krista L.·2010·CNS Drugs

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease is associated with a substantial economic impact on patients, their caregivers and society. Due to the current rise in the aging population, the prevalence and impact of Alzheimer's disease are expected to increase greatly. The cost of caring for someone with Alzheimer's disease is magnified in the more severe stages of the disease. There are four cognitive enhancers commonly used for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease: three cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine) and one NMDA receptor antagonist (memantine). Of these, donepezil and memantine have been approved in many countries as pharmacological treatments for moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease, while donepezil, rivastigmine and galantamine are approved treatments for mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. While cost effectiveness has been well studied in mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease, the cost-benefit information for drug therapy in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease is less clear. This article reviews the pharmacoeconomic data available on these four drugs, with a specific focus on moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease, including economic burden, cost drivers, clinical outcomes and pharmacoeconomic studies. A key driver of the cost of Alzheimer's disease is the severity of the disease, indicating that the ability to stabilize the disease state is a potential source of cost savings. Drug therapies that can limit increases in behavioural problems and cognitive and functional impairment, and postpone institutionalization without an increase in longevity may serve to reduce the economic burden on Alzheimer's disease patients. The data suggest that, while the available, approved agents offer only modest improvements in clinical outcomes, they could be cost-effective treatments for moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease when viewed from the societal perspective. For memantine and donepezil, data are available that suggest that the cost of these drugs is offset by the clinical and societal benefits provided by slowing the progression of Alzheimer's disease. While there are few head-to-head comparison trials, the similarity in costs of the treatments and efficacy against placebo suggest that cost effectiveness will not be substantially different among treatments. More studies that examine longitudinal resource utilization and its relationship to drug treatment in the moderate to severe stages are needed to clarify cost benefit in this population and possibly differentiate between individual medications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2165/11539530-000000000-00000

Cites

111 of 111 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Anti-AD pharmacotherapy (donepezil, memantine, galantamine, rivastigmine) can reduce the economic burden of the illness, even in later stages of illness.

    “Viewed from the social perspective, anti-AD pharmacotherapy (donepezil, memantine, galantamine, rivastigmine) can reduce the economic burden of the illness, even in later stages of illness.66”

    From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [66]

  • Therapies that minimize caregiver burden and delay nursing home entry translate into significant benefits related to worker productivity and health care savings.

    “From a public health and economics perspective, therapies that minimize caregiver burden and delay nursing home entry translate into significant benefits related to worker productivity and health care savings.66,[73][74][75]”

    From The Alzheimer’s Disease Clinical Spectrum (2019) · cites this paper as [66]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 112 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cappell, J., Herrmann, N., Cornish, S., & Lanctôt, K. L.
Affiliations
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
Corresponding author
Lanctôt, Krista L.
Venue
CNS Drugs
Published
2010-11
Volume
24
Issue
11
Pages
909-927
ISSN
1172-7047 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041110161
Cited by
57
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 12
FWCI
1.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CNS Drugs (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Pfizer
  • H. Lundbeck A/S
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, nootropic drugs, cholinesterase inhibitors, donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine, memantine, NMDA receptor antagonists, cost-effectiveness, economic burden, caregiver costs, institutionalization, disease progression, resource utilization (health care)
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Clinical Trials as Topic, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Drug Therapy, Combination, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Health Care Costs, Disease Progression, Nootropic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review