Cited by 24Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSchizophrenia research and treatmentNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

Clinical utility of ADHD symptom thresholds to assess normalization of executive function with lisdexamfetamine dimesylate treatment in adults

Brown, Thomas E., Brams, Matthew, Gasior, Maria, Adeyi, Ben, Babcock, Thomas, Dirks, Bryan, Scheckner, Brian, Wigal, Timothy·2011·Current Medical Research and Opinion

Abstract

Objectives This analysis assessed the relationship of various cutoff scores of the ADHD Rating Scale IV (ADHD-RS-IV) to levels of improvement in ADHD-related executive function (EF), measured by the Brown ADD Scale for Adults (BADDS), which may provide a measure of clinically meaningful EF improvement after ADHD treatment. Methods Post hoc analysis of a 4-week, open-label, dose-optimization phase in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in adults with ADHD. The BADDS for Adults, a validated, normed, self-report measure of EF in ADHD, provides a qualitative measure to rate treatment progress. The ADHD-RS-IV assesses current symptom status based on DSM-IV criteria. Postbaseline ADHD-RS-IV scores were categorized according to four cutoff criteria of symptom remission: (1) ADHD-RS-IV total score ≤ 18; (2) ADHD-RS-IV total score ≤ 10; (3) no ADHD-RS-IV item scored >1; and (4) ADHD-RS-IV total score ≤ 18 and ≤ 2 items per subscale with a score of 2. Sensitivity and specificity of criteria for identifying participants with optimal BADDS scores were assessed using receiver operating characteristics (ROC). Safety evaluation included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Results At endpoint, 85/127 participants had optimal BADDS scores. Linear ANOVA indicated limited overlap between BADDS and ADHD-RS-IV scores (r (2) = 0.20; P Conclusion Criteria 2 and 3 had satisfactorily high sensitivity, but no criteria had adequate specificity. AUC compa…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1185/03007995.2011.605441

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a post hoc analysis of the AWE study, at study end point BADDS total and cluster scores were significantly reduced from baseline (P < .0001), 62.7% had BADDS total <50, and 78.9% reliably improved versus 1.4% reliably worsened.

    “At study end point, BADDS total and cluster scores were significantly reduced compared with baseline (P < .0001), and 62.7% of participants had a BADDS total score <50 with 78.9% reliably improved compared with 1.4% reliably worsened.”
  • BADDS scores predict clinical diagnosis of ADHD and multiple ADHD medication trials use the BADDS to assess symptom severity and improvement.

    “BADDS scores predict clinical diagnosis of ADHD [36] and multiple ADHD medication trials use the BADDS to assess symptom severity and improvement [16,37–39].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brown, T. E., Brams, M., Gasior, M., Adeyi, B., Babcock, T., Dirks, B., Scheckner, B., & Wigal, T.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Bayou City Research, Houston, TX, USA
  • Shire Development Inc., Wayne, PA, USA
  • University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Thomas E.
Venue
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2011-10-01
Volume
27
Issue
sup2
Pages
23-33
ISSN
  • 0300-7995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4877
OpenAlex
W2087643483
Cited by
24
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Medical Research and Opinion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
adult ADHD, lisdexamfetamine dimesylate, executive function, ADHD Rating Scale-IV, treatment response assessment, sensitivity and specificity, stimulant medication, treatment-emergent adverse events, dose optimization, treatment-emergent mania
MeSH terms
Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate, Adolescent, Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Dextroamphetamine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, ROC Curve, Young Adult, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review