Cited by 33Reproductive Health and TechnologiesReproductive Health and ContraceptionReproductive Physiology in Livestock

Accuracy of perception of ovulation day in women trying to conceive

Zinaman, Michael, Johnson, Sarah, Ellis, Jayne, Ledger, William·2012·Current Medical Research and Opinion

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The likelihood of conception is increased if intercourse is timed to coincide with the fertile period (5 days up to ovulation). However, to be effective, this requires good awareness of the day of ovulation. The aim of this study was to examine the accuracy of women's perceived ovulation day, compared with actual fertile days, in a cohort of women trying to conceive. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Comparison of women's estimated day of ovulation with their actual ovulation day (determined by detecting luteinising hormone). METHODS: This was a sample collection study and volunteer women were recruited via online advertising. At recruitment volunteers reported the cycle day they believed they ovulated. They then used a home urine fertility monitor to test their daily fertility status to time intercourse to try and achieve conception, in addition to collecting early morning urine samples for laboratory analysis. The main outcome measure was a comparison of women's estimated day of ovulation with their actual ovulation day, as determined by urine detection of luteinising hormone. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty women were recruited onto the study and data was available for 102 volunteers who became pregnant. Thirteen women (12.7%) correctly estimated their ovulation day; median difference +2 days, range -10 to +27 days. The most common days for estimation of ovulation were day 14 (35.5%) and day 15 (15.7%). Only 55% of estimated ovulation days fell within the volunteers' fertile window; only 27% on days of peak fertility. CONCLUSIONS: Women trying to conceive may benefit from using a prospective method to identify their fertile phase, as a significant proportion could be incorrectly estimating their fertile days. These observations were made on women who were actively looking for knowledge on fertility and considered only cycles where conception occurred, inaccuracy could be greater if a broader population is considered.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1185/03007995.2012.681638

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Incorrect timing of intercourse appears to be an important reason for couples failing to conceive, due to a combination of lack of fertility knowledge and inaccurate perception of their own menstrual cycles.

    “Incorrect timing of intercourse appears to be an important reason for couples failing to conceive, due to a combination of lack of fertility knowledge and inaccurate perception of their own menstrual cycles (Zinaman et al. 2012).”

    From Real-life insights on menstrual cycles and ovulation using big data (2020) · cites this paper as Zinaman et al. 2012

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zinaman, M., Johnson, S., Ellis, J., & Ledger, W.
Affiliations
  • Tufts University (US)
  • SPD Swiss Precision Diagnostics Development Co. Ltd BedfordUK
  • Alere International CranfieldUK
  • Royal Hospital for Women (AU)
Corresponding author
Johnson, Sarah
Venue
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2012-04-18
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
749-754
ISSN
  • 0300-7995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4877
OpenAlex
W1995044351
Cited by
33
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Medical Research and Opinion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Reproductive Physiology in Livestock
Keywords
fertility awareness, fertile window, luteinizing hormone, timed intercourse, conception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Coitus, Female, Fertilization, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Luteinizing Hormone, Menstrual Cycle, Middle Aged, Ovulation Detection, Perception, Pregnancy, Prospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Urinalysis, Ovulation Prediction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review