Cited by 238Reproductive Health and TechnologiesOvarian function and disordersReproductive Health and Contraception

Prediction of ovulation by urinary hormone measurements with the home use ClearPlan fertility monitor: comparison with transvaginal ultrasound scans and serum hormone measurements

Behre, H.M., Kuhlage, J., Gaβner, C., Sonntag, B., Schem, C., Schneider, H.P.G., Nieschlag, E.·2000·Human Reproduction

Abstract

The timing of sexual intercourse in relation to ovulation strongly influences the chance of conception. Daily serum LH measurements or transvaginal ultrasonography are not practical to determine ovulation in consecutive cycles for an individual. A prospective study was initiated to test the home use performance of the ClearPlan Fertility Monitor (CPFM) in ovulation prediction compared with transvaginal ultrasonography and serum hormone measurements. A total of 53 women aged 18-39 years with a normal uterus and at least one ovary, cycle length between 21-42 days and not using medication which interferes with ovarian function contributed 150 cycles for analysis. One cycle was anovulatory and no LH surge, indicating peak fertility, was detected by the monitor. Of the remaining 149 cycles, 135 (90.6%) had a monitor LH surge and ultrasonographically confirmed ovulation. Ovulation was detected in 91.1% of cycles during the 2 days of CPFM peak fertility. Ovulation was observed in 51.1% of cycles 1 day and in 43.2% of cycles 2 days after the surge in serum LH. Ovulation never occurred before CPFM peak fertility or the serum LH surge day. CPFM can help women who desire pregnancy to time intercourse. It may also have potential as a diagnostic aid and for monitoring the treatment of infertility.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/humrep/15.12.2478

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Variation in luteal phase lengths has previously been observed in controlled clinical studies.

    “Variation in luteal phase lengths has previously been observed in controlled clinical studies7,24,28”
  • Home urinary luteinising hormone tests may be used to determine fertile days or used as input to BBT methods to improve the accuracy of ovulation detection.

    “Home urinary luteinising hormone (LH) tests may also be used to determine fertile days24 or used as input to BBT methods to improve the accuracy of ovulation detection.20”
  • Imprecision of ±1 day has been reported for the assay used to assign ovulation day.

    “However, imprecision of ±1 day has been reported for this assay (Behre et al. 2000).”

    From Real-life insights on menstrual cycles and ovulation using big data (2020) · cites this paper as Behre et al. 2000

  • Ovulation day was assigned as the day following the LH surge, as comparisons between the assays used by the connected ovulation tests and transvaginal ultrasonography have indicated that this is the average relationship between the measures.

    “In this study, ovulation day was assigned as the day following the LH surge, as comparisons between the assays used by the connected ovulation tests and transvaginal ultrasonography have indicated that this is the average relationship between the measures.”

    From Real-life insights on menstrual cycles and ovulation using big data (2020) · cites this paper as Behre et al. 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Behre, H. M., Kuhlage, J., Gaβner, C., Sonntag, B., Schem, C., Schneider, H. P. G., & Nieschlag, E.
Affiliations
University of Münster (DE)
Venue
Human Reproduction
Published
2000-12
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
2478-2482
ISSN
  • 0268-1161 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2350
OpenAlex
W2144853611
Cited by
238
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 8
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Reproduction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Health and Technologies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
Keywords
ovulation prediction, urinary luteinizing hormone, luteinizing hormone surge, transvaginal ultrasound, serum LH, timing of intercourse, conception
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Estradiol, Estrone, Female, Fertility, Ovarian Follicle, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Menstrual Cycle, Ovulation Detection, Prospective Studies, Reagent Strips, Ultrasonography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review