Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuromodulation of chronic headaches: position statement from the European Headache Federation

Open access
Martelletti, Paolo, Jensen, Rigmor H, Antal, Andrea, Arcioni, Roberto, Brighina, Filippo, de Tommaso, Marina, Franzini, Angelo, Fontaine, Denys, Heiland, Max, Jürgens, Tim P, Leone, Massimo, Magis, Delphine, Paemeleire, Koen, Palmisani, Stefano, Paulus, Walter, May, Arne·2013·The Journal of Headache and Pain

Abstract

The medical treatment of patients with chronic primary headache syndromes (chronic migraine, chronic tension-type headache, chronic cluster headache, hemicrania continua) is challenging as serious side effects frequently complicate the course of medical treatment and some patients may be even medically intractable. When a definitive lack of responsiveness to conservative treatments is ascertained and medication overuse headache is excluded, neuromodulation options can be considered in selected cases. Here, the various invasive and non-invasive approaches, such as hypothalamic deep brain stimulation, occipital nerve stimulation, stimulation of sphenopalatine ganglion, cervical spinal cord stimulation, vagus nerve stimulation, transcranial direct current stimulation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation, and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation are extensively published although proper RCT-based evidence is limited. The European Headache Federation herewith provides a consensus statement on the clinical use of neuromodulation in headache, based on theoretical background, clinical data, and side effect of each method. This international consensus further gives recommendations for future studies on these new approaches. In spite of a growing field of stimulation devices in headaches treatment, further controlled studies to validate, strengthen and disseminate the use of neurostimulation are clearly warranted. Consequently, until these data are available any neurostimulation device should only be used in patients with medically intractable syndromes from tertiary headache centers either as part of a valid study or have shown to be effective in such controlled studies with an acceptable side effect profile.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1129-2377-14-86

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Martelletti, P., Jensen, R. H., Antal, A., Arcioni, R., Brighina, F., de Tommaso, M., Franzini, A., Fontaine, D., Heiland, M., Jürgens, T. P., Leone, M., Magis, D., Paemeleire, K., Palmisani, S., Paulus, W., & May, A.
Venue
The Journal of Headache and Pain
Published
2013-10-21
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
86-86
ISSN
  • 1129-2369 (ISSN-L)
  • 1129-2377
OpenAlex
W2158520507
Cited by
210
References
8
FWCI
15.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuromodulation of chronic headaches: position statement from the European Headache Federation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1129-2377-14-86
The paper
Martelletti, P., Jensen, R. H., Antal, A., Arcioni, R., Brighina, F., de Tommaso, M., Franzini, A., Fontaine, D., Heiland, M., Jürgens, T. P., Leone, M., Magis, D., Paemeleire, K., Palmisani, S., Paulus, W., & May, A. (2013). Neuromodulation of chronic headaches: position statement from the European Headache Federation. The Journal of Headache and Pain. https://doi.org/10.1186/1129-2377-14-86

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.