Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Calculation of Tajima’s D and other neutrality test statistics from low depth next-generation sequencing data

Korneliussen, Thorfinn Sand, Moltke, Ida, Albrechtsen, Anders, Nielsen, Rasmus·2013·BMC Bioinformatics

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2105-14-289

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Multiple tools exist for assessing contamination levels in haploid chromosomes, both from mitochondrial DNA data and using the X-chromosome in males.

    “However, multiple tools exist for assessing contamination levels in haploid chromosomes, both from mitochondrial DNA data (for example schmutzi 189 ) and using the X-chromosome in males (for example ANGSD 190,191 ).”

    From Ancient DNA analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [191]

    The Methods > Model passage identifies ANGSD as a tool used to calculate genotype likelihoods, not to assess contamination. Searches for contamination and for the male X chromosome found no passage in our copy addressing that use of ANGSD. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Nielsen R: Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu Rev Genet. 2005, 39: 197-218. 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112420. · DOI
  2. Voight BF, Kudaravalli S, Wen X, Pritchard JK: A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 2006, 4 (3): e72-10.1371/journal.pbio.0040072. · DOI
  3. Pickrell JK, Coop G, Novembre J, Kudaravalli S, Li JZ, Absher D, Srinivasan BS, Barsh GS, Myers RM, Feldman MW, Pritchard JK: Signals of recent positive selection in a worldwide sample of human populations. Genome Res. 2009, 19 (5): 826-837. 10.1101/gr.087577.108. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bersaglieri T, Sabeti PC, Patterson N, Vanderploeg T, Schaffner SF, Drake JA, Rhodes M, Reich DE, Hirschhorn JN: Genetic signatures of strong recent positive selection at the lactase gene. Am J Hum Genet. 2004, 74: 1111-1120. 10.1086/421051. · DOI
  5. Seltsam A, Hallensleben M, Kollmann A, Blasczyk R: The nature of diversity and diversification at the ABO locus. Blood. 2003, 102: 3035-3042. 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0955. · DOI
  6. Hughes AL, Yeager M: Natural selection and the evolutionary history of major histocompatibility complex loci. Front Biosci. 1998, 3: d509-d516. · DOI
  7. Akey JM, Eberle MA, Rieder MJ, Carlson CS, Shriver MD, Nickerson DA, Kruglyak L: Population history and natural selection shape patterns of genetic variation in 132 genes. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2 (10): e286-10.1371/journal.pbio.0020286. · DOI
  8. Mardis ER: Next-generation DNA sequencing methods. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2008, 9: 387-402. 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164359. · DOI
  9. Ramírez-Soriano A, Nielsen R: Correcting estimators of theta and Tajima’s D for ascertainment biases caused by the single-nucleotide polymorphism discovery process. Genetics. 2009, 181: 701-710. · DOI
  10. Crawford JE, Lazzaro BP: Assessing the accuracy and power of population genetic inference from low-pass next-generation sequencing data. Front Genet. 2012, 3: 66- · DOI
  11. Harismendy O, Ng PC, Strausberg RL, Wang X, Stockwell TB, Beeson KY, Schork NJ, Murray SS, Topol EJ, Levy S, Frazer KA: Evaluation of next generation sequencing platforms for population targeted sequencing studies. Genome Biol. 2009, 10: R32-10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r32. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Li H, Ruan J, Durbin R: Mapping short DNA sequencing reads and calling variants using mapping quality scores. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 1851-1858. 10.1101/gr.078212.108. · DOI · Paper page
  13. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA: The genome analysis toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20: 1297-1303. 10.1101/gr.107524.110. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Li R, Li Y, Fang X, Yang H, Wang J, Kristiansen K, Wang J: SNP detection for massively parallel whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res. 2009, 19: 1124-1132. 10.1101/gr.088013.108. · DOI · Paper page
  15. Pool JE, Hellmann I, Jensen JD, Nielsen R: Population genetic inference from genomic sequence variation. Genome Res. 2010, 20: 291-300. 10.1101/gr.079509.108. · DOI
  16. Johnson PLF, Slatkin M: Inference of population genetic parameters in metagenomics: a clean look at messy data. Genome Res. 2006, 16: 1320-1327. 10.1101/gr.5431206. · DOI
  17. Ferretti L, Raineri E, Ramos-Onsins S: Neutrality tests for sequences with missing data. Genetics. 2012, 191: 1397-1401. 10.1534/genetics.112.139949. · DOI
  18. Achaz G: Testing for neutrality in samples with sequencing errors. Genetics. 2008, 179: 1409-1424. 10.1534/genetics.107.082198. · DOI
  19. Liu X, Fu YX, Maxwell TJ, Boerwinkle E: Estimating population genetic parameters and comparing model goodness-of-fit using DNA sequences with error. Genome Res. 2010, 20: 101-109. 10.1101/gr.097543.109. · DOI
  20. Hellmann I, Mang Y, Gu Z, Li P, de la Vega FM, Clark AG, Nielsen R: Population genetic analysis of shotgun assemblies of genomic sequences from multiple individuals. Genome Res. 2008, 18: 1020-1029. 10.1101/gr.074187.107. · DOI
  21. Johnson PLF, Slatkin M: Accounting for bias from sequencing error in population genetic estimates. Mol Biol Evol. 2008, 25: 199-206. · DOI
  22. Watterson GA: On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975, 7: 256-276. 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. · DOI
  23. Tajima F: Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989, 123: 585-595. · DOI
  24. Fu YX, Li WH: Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 1993, 133: 693-709. · DOI
  25. Fay JC, Wu CI: Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics. 2000, 155: 1405-1413. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Durrett R: Probability models for DNA sequence evolution. 2008, Springer, 2 · DOI
  27. Kaplan NL, Hudson RR, Langley CH: The “hitchhiking effect” revisited. Genetics. 1989, 123: 887-899. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Li H: A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27: 2987-2993. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509. · DOI
  29. Kim SY, Lohmueller KE, Albrechtsen A, Li Y, Korneliussen T, Tian G, Grarup N, Jiang T, Andersen G, Witte D, Jorgensen T, Hansen T, Pedersen O, Wang J, Nielsen R: Estimation of allele frequency and association mapping using next-generation sequencing data. BMC Bioinforma. 2011, 12: 231-10.1186/1471-2105-12-231. · DOI
  30. Keightley PD, Halligan DL: Inference of site frequency spectra from high-throughput sequence data: quantification of selection on nonsynonymous and synonymous sites in humans. Genetics. 2011, 188: 931-940. 10.1534/genetics.111.128355. · DOI
  31. Skotte L, Korneliussen TS, Albrechtsen A: Association testing for next-generation sequencing data using score statistics. Genet Epidemiol. 2012, 36: 430-437. 10.1002/gepi.21636. · DOI
  32. Ewing G, Hermisson J: MSMS: a coalescent simulation program including recombination, demographic structure and selection at a single locus. Bioinformatics. 2010, 26: 2064-2065. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq322. · DOI
  33. Broman KW, Murray JC, Sheffield VC, White RL, Weber JL: Comprehensive human genetic maps: individual and sex-specific variation in recombination. Am J Hum Genet. 1998, 63: 861-869. 10.1086/302011. · DOI
  34. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, Del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, McKenna A, Fennell TJ, Kernytsky AM, Sivachenko AY, Cibulskis K, Gabriel SB, Altshuler D, Daly MJ: A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011, 43: 491-498. 10.1038/ng.806. · DOI
  35. Kent WJ, Sugnet CW, Furey TS, Roskin KM, Pringle TH, Zahler AM, Haussler D: The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res. 2002, 12: 996-1006. · DOI · Paper page
  36. Hinds DA, Stuve LL, Nilsen GB, Halperin E, Eskin E, Ballinger DG, Frazer KA, Cox DR: Whole-genome patterns of common DNA variation in three human populations. Science. 2005, 307: 1072-1079. 10.1126/science.1105436. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Korneliussen, T. S., Moltke, I., Albrechtsen, A., & Nielsen, R.
Venue
BMC Bioinformatics
Published
2013-10-02
Volume
14
Issue
1
ISSN
1471-2105
Cited by
269
References
9
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review