The DOI matches its Crossref record.
SynTReN: a generator of synthetic gene expression data for design and analysis of structure learning algorithms
Open accessAbstract
Background: The development of algorithms to infer the structure of gene regulatory networks based on expression data is an important subject in bioinformatics research. Validation of these algorithms requires benchmark data sets for which the underlying network is known. Since experimental data sets of the appropriate size and design are usually not available, there is a clear need to generate well-characterized synthetic data sets that allow thorough testing of learning algorithms in a fast and reproducible manner. Results: In this paper we describe a network generator that creates synthetic transcriptional regulatory networks and produces simulated gene expression data that approximates experimental data. Network topologies are generated by selecting subnetworks from previously described regulatory networks. Interaction kinetics are modeled by equations based on Michaelis-Menten and Hill kinetics. Our results show that the statistical properties of these topologies more closely approximate those of genuine biological networks than do those of different types of random graph models. Several user-definable parameters adjust the complexity of the resulting data set with respect to the structure learning algorithms. Conclusion: This network generation technique offers a valid alternative to existing methods. The topological characteristics of the generated networks more closely resemble the characteristics of real transcriptional networks. Simulation of the network scales well to large networks. The generator models different types of biological interactions and produces biologically plausible synthetic gene expression data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Integrating structured biological data by Kernel Maximum Mean Discrepancy
Borgwardt, K. M., Gretton, A., Rasch, M. J., Kriegel, H.-P., Schölkopf, B., & Smola, A. J. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl242 · Cited by 1,674
Information-Theoretic Inference of Large Transcriptional Regulatory Networks
Meyer, P. E., Kontos, K., Lafitte, F., & Bontempi, G. (2007) · EURASIP Journal on Bioinformatics and Systems Biology · doi:10.1155/2007/79879 · Cited by 273
D’ya Like DAGs? A Survey on Structure Learning and Causal Discovery
Vowels, M. J., Camgoz, N. C., & Bowden, R. (2023) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3527154 · Cited by 237
A Survey on Causal Discovery: Theory and Practice
Zanga, A., Ozkirimli, E., & Stella, F. (2022) · International Journal of Approximate Reasoning · doi:10.1016/j.ijar.2022.09.004 · Cited by 129
Spearheading future omics analyses using dyngen, a multi-modal simulator of single cells
Cannoodt, R., Saelens, W., Deconinck, L., & Saeys, Y. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-24152-2 · Cited by 124
Learning Functional Causal Models with Generative Neural Networks
Goudet, O., Kalainathan, D., Caillou, P., Guyon, I., Lopez-Paz, D., & Sebag, M. (2018) · The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-98131-4_3 · Cited by 123
Reverse engineering and analysis of large genome-scale gene networks
Aluru, M., Zola, J., Nettleton, D., & Aluru, S. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gks904 · Cited by 34
Robust and sparse correlation matrix estimation for the analysis of high-dimensional genomics data
Serra, A., Coretto, P., Fratello, M., & Tagliaferri, R. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btx642 · Cited by 25
Lasri, A., Shahrezaei, V., & Sturrock, M. (2022) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-022-04778-9 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Van den Bulcke, T., Van Leemput, K., Naudts, B., van Remortel, P., Ma, H., Verschoren, A., De Moor, B., & Marchal, K.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2006-01-26
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 43-43
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1851422093
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.