CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 317Gut microbiota and healthCeliac Disease Research and ManagementProbiotics and Fermented Foods

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Duodenal and faecal microbiota of celiac children: molecular, phenotype and metabolome characterization

Open access
Di Cagno, Raffaella, De Angelis, Maria, De Pasquale, Ilaria, Ndagijimana, Maurice, Vernocchi, Pamela, Ricciuti, Patrizia, Gagliardi, Francesca, Laghi, Luca, Crecchio, Carmine, Guerzoni, Maria Elisabetta, Gobbetti, Marco, Francavilla, Ruggiero·2011·BMC Microbiology
DOI 10.1186/1471-2180-11-219PMC PMC3206437
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Background: Epidemiology of celiac disease (CD) is increasing. CD mainly presents in early childhood with small intestinal villous atrophy and signs of malabsorption. Compared to healthy individuals, CD patients seemed to be characterized by higher numbers of Gram-negative bacteria and lower numbers Gram-positive bacteria. Results: This study aimed at investigating the microbiota and metabolome of 19 celiac disease children under gluten-free diet (treated celiac disease, T-CD) and 15 non-celiac children (HC). PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) analyses by universal and group-specific primers were carried out in duodenal biopsies and faecal samples. Based on the number of PCR-DGGE bands, the diversity of Eubacteria was the higher in duodenal biopsies of T-CD than HC children. Bifidobacteria were only found in faecal samples. With a few exceptions, PCR-DGGE profiles of faecal samples for Lactobacillus and Bifidobacteria differed between T-CD and HC. As shown by culture-dependent methods, the levels of Lactobacillus , Enterococcus and Bifidobacteria were confirmed to be significantly higher ( P = 0.028; P = 0.019; and P = 0.023, respectively) in fecal samples of HC than in T-CD children. On the contrary, cell counts (CFU/ml) of presumptive Bacteroides , Staphylococcus , Salmonella , Shighella and Klebsiella were significantly higher ( P = 0.014) in T-CD compared to HC children. Enterococcus faecium and Lactobacillus plantarum were the species most diffusely identified. This latter species was also found in all duodenal biopsies of T-CD and HC children. Other bacterial species were identified only in T-CD or HC faecal samples. As shown by Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA-PCR analysis, the percentage of strains identified as lactobacilli significantly ( P = 0.011) differed between T-CD (ca. 26.5%) and HC (ca. 34.6%) groups. The metabolome of T-CD and HC children was studied using faecal and urine samples which were analyzed by gas-chromatography mass spectrometry-solid-phase microextraction and 1 H-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. As shown by Canonical Discriminant Analysis of Principal Coordinates, the levels of volatile organic compounds and free amino acids in faecal and/or urine samples were markedly affected by CD. Conclusion: As shown by the parallel microbiology and metabolome approach, the gluten-free diet lasting at least two years did not completely restore the microbiota and, consequently, the metabolome of CD children. Some molecules (e.g., ethyl-acetate and octyl-acetate, some short chain fatty acids and free amino acids, and glutamine) seems to be metabolic signatures of CD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2180-11-219

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Clustering of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles of biopsies from thirty-four children (1-34). Universal V6-V8 (A) and Lac1/Lac2 Lactobacillus group (B) primers were used. Clustering was carried out using the unweighted pair-group method with the arithmetic average (UPGMA) based on the Pearson correlation coefficient. T-CD, treated celiac disease children; and HC, non-celiac children; band a, L. plantarum; band b, human DNA. See materials and methods for correspondence of numbered duodenal biopsies.
Figure 1 Clustering of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles of biopsies from thirty-four children (1-34). Universal V6-V8 (A) and Lac1/Lac2 Lactobacillus group (B) primers were used. Clustering was carried out using the unweighted pair-group method with the arithmetic average (UPGMA) based on the Pearson correlation coefficient. T-CD, treated celiac disease children; and HC, non-celiac children; band a, L. plantarum; band b, human DNA. See materials and methods for correspondence of numbered duodenal biopsies.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Clustering of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles of faecal samples from thirty-four children (1-34). Universal V6-V8 (A), Lac1/Lac2 Lactobacillus group (B), g- Bifid F/g-BifidRGC Bifidobacterium group (C) primers were used. Clustering was carried out using the unweighted pair-group method with the arithmetic average (UPGMA) based on the Pearson correlation coefficient. T-CD, treated celiac disease children; and HC, non-celiac children. See materials and methods for correspondence of numbered faecal samples.
Figure 2 Clustering of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles of faecal samples from thirty-four children (1-34). Universal V6-V8 (A), Lac1/Lac2 Lactobacillus group (B), g- Bifid F/g-BifidRGC Bifidobacterium group (C) primers were used. Clustering was carried out using the unweighted pair-group method with the arithmetic average (UPGMA) based on the Pearson correlation coefficient. T-CD, treated celiac disease children; and HC, non-celiac children. See materials and methods for correspondence of numbered faecal samples.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Cultivable cells (log cfu/g) of the main microbial groups in faecal samples of treated celiac disease (T-CD) children and non-celiac children children (HC). The data are the means of three independent experiments (n = 3). The top and bottom of the box represent the 75th and 25th percentile of the data, respectively. The top and bottom of the error bars represent the 5th and 95th percentile of the data, respectively.
Figure 3 Cultivable cells (log cfu/g) of the main microbial groups in faecal samples of treated celiac disease (T-CD) children and non-celiac children children (HC). The data are the means of three independent experiments (n = 3). The top and bottom of the box represent the 75th and 25th percentile of the data, respectively. The top and bottom of the error bars represent the 5th and 95th percentile of the data, respectively.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Dendrogram of combined RAPD patterns for Enterococcus using primer P7, P4 and M13. Isolates were from faecal samples of treated celiac disease (T-CD). Cluster analysis was based on the simple matching coefficient and unweighted pair grouped method, arithmetic average. Enterococcus and Lactobacillus isolates (I) are coded based on partial 16S rRNA, recA and pheS gene sequence comparisons and correspond to those of Table 2.
Figure 4 Dendrogram of combined RAPD patterns for Enterococcus using primer P7, P4 and M13. Isolates were from faecal samples of treated celiac disease (T-CD). Cluster analysis was based on the simple matching coefficient and unweighted pair grouped method, arithmetic average. Enterococcus and Lactobacillus isolates (I) are coded based on partial 16S rRNA, recA and pheS gene sequence comparisons and correspond to those of Table 2.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Dendrogram of combined RAPD patterns for Enterococcus using primer P7, P4 and M13. Isolates were from faecal samples of non-celiac children (HC). Cluster analysis was based on the simple matching coefficient and unweighted pair grouped method, arithmetic average. Enterococcus and Lactobacillus isolates (I) are coded based on partial 16S rRNA, recA and pheS gene sequence comparisons and correspond to those of Table 2.
Figure 5 Dendrogram of combined RAPD patterns for Enterococcus using primer P7, P4 and M13. Isolates were from faecal samples of non-celiac children (HC). Cluster analysis was based on the simple matching coefficient and unweighted pair grouped method, arithmetic average. Enterococcus and Lactobacillus isolates (I) are coded based on partial 16S rRNA, recA and pheS gene sequence comparisons and correspond to those of Table 2.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Dendrogram of combined RAPD patterns for Lactobacillus using primer P7, P4 and M13. Isolates were from faecal samples of treated celiac disease (T-CD) (A) and non-celiac children (HC) (B). Cluster analysis was based on the simple matching coefficient and unweighted pair grouped method, arithmetic average. Enterococcus and Lactobacillus isolates (I) are coded based on partial 16S rRNA, recA and pheS gene sequence comparisons and correspond to those of Table 2.
Figure 6 Dendrogram of combined RAPD patterns for Lactobacillus using primer P7, P4 and M13. Isolates were from faecal samples of treated celiac disease (T-CD) (A) and non-celiac children (HC) (B). Cluster analysis was based on the simple matching coefficient and unweighted pair grouped method, arithmetic average. Enterococcus and Lactobacillus isolates (I) are coded based on partial 16S rRNA, recA and pheS gene sequence comparisons and correspond to those of Table 2.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Canonical Discriminant Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP) loading coefficient plot of the volatile organic metabolites from faecal (A) and urine (B) samples of treated celiac disease (T-CD) and non-celiac children (HC). Data are the means of three independent experiments (n = 3).
Figure 7 Canonical Discriminant Analysis of Principal Coordinates (CAP) loading coefficient plot of the volatile organic metabolites from faecal (A) and urine (B) samples of treated celiac disease (T-CD) and non-celiac children (HC). Data are the means of three independent experiments (n = 3).CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 317

Related

Metadata

Authors
Di Cagno, R., De Angelis, M., De Pasquale, I., Ndagijimana, M., Vernocchi, P., Ricciuti, P., Gagliardi, F., Laghi, L., Crecchio, C., Guerzoni, M. E., Gobbetti, M., & Francavilla, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of Bari Aldo Moro (IT)
ORCID
Venue
BMC Microbiology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-10-04
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
219-219
ISSN
1471-2180 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1471-2180-11-219
PMC
PMC3206437
OpenAlex
W2048710178
Cited by
317
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Research (University of Surrey) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
Keywords
celiac disease, pediatric celiac disease, duodenal microbiota, fecal microbiota, gluten-free diet, Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, Enterococcus faecium, Lactobacillus plantarum, gut metabolome, urinary metabolites, fecal metabolites, bacterial diversity, Enterobacteriaceae, small intestinal villous atrophy
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Duodenum, Feces, Female, Humans, Male, Phenotype, Phylogeny, Urine, Case-Control Studies, Metagenome, Metabolome, Volatile Organic Compounds

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review