Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 174

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular analysis of methanogenic archaea in the forestomach of the alpaca (Vicugna pacos)

Open access
St-Pierre, Benoit, Wright, André-Denis G·2012·BMC Microbiology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Methanogens that populate the gastrointestinal tract of livestock ruminants contribute significantly to methane emissions from the agriculture industry. There is a great need to analyze archaeal microbiomes from a broad range of host species in order to establish causal relationships between the structure of methanogen communities and their potential for methane emission. In this report, we present an investigation of methanogenic archaeal populations in the foregut of alpacas. RESULTS: We constructed individual 16S rRNA gene clone libraries from five sampled animals and recovered a total of 947 sequences which were assigned to 51 species-level OTUs. Individuals were found to each have between 21 and 27 OTUs, of which two to six OTUs were unique. As reported in other host species, Methanobrevibacter was the dominant genus in the alpaca, representing 88.3% of clones. However, the alpaca archaeal microbiome was different from other reported host species, as clones showing species-level identity to Methanobrevibacter millerae were the most abundant. CONCLUSION: From our analysis, we propose a model to describe the population structure of Methanobrevibacter-related methanogens in the alpaca and in previously reported host species, which may contribute in unraveling the complexity of symbiotic archaeal communities in herbivores.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2180-12-1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. 10.1079/BJN19760053 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01029.x · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1128/AEM.02436-08 · DOI
  4. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00750.x · DOI
  5. 10.1038/ismej.2009.41 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2009.08.012 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/0921-4488(89)90001-1 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.10.006 · doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.10.006
  9. 10.1051/rnd:19970608 · doi:10.1051/rnd:19970608
  10. 10.1017/S002185960300306X · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00002-6 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2010.06.004 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00169-6 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00394.x · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1128/AEM.01541-09 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1007/s00248-007-9351-x · DOI
  18. 10.1128/AEM.01672-08 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2006.02.002 · DOI
  20. 10.1128/AEM.00103-07 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2009.02654.x · DOI
  22. 10.1016/j.anaerobe.2005.02.001 · DOI
  23. 10.1186/1471-2180-1-1 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1128/AEM.00010-10 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1128/AEM.02812-07 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 174

Metadata

Authors
St-Pierre, B., & Wright, A.-D. G.
Venue
BMC Microbiology
Published
2012
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
1
ISSN
1471-2180 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089339044
Cited by
174
References
2
FWCI
19.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular analysis of methanogenic archaea in the forestomach of the alpaca (Vicugna pacos). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2180-12-1
The paper
St-Pierre, B., & Wright, A.-D. G. (2012). Molecular analysis of methanogenic archaea in the forestomach of the alpaca (Vicugna pacos). BMC Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2180-12-1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.