The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of the monoamine transporters from human and mouse in their sensitivities to psychostimulant drugs
Open accessAbstract
Background: The plasma membrane neurotransmitter transporters terminate neurotransmissions by the reuptake of the released neurotransmitters. The transporters for the monoamines dopamine, norepinephrine, and serotonin (DAT, NET, and SERT) are targets for several popular psychostimulant drugs of abuse. The potencies of the psychostimulant on the monoamine transporters have been studied by several laboratories. However, there are significant discrepancies in the reported data with differences up to 60-fold. In addition, the drug potencies of the 3 monoamine transporters from mouse have not been compared in the same experiments or along side the human transporters. Further studies and systematic comparisons are needed. Results: In this study, we compared the potencies of five psychostimulant drugs to inhibit human and mouse DAT, SERT and NET in the same cellular background. The K I values of cocaine to inhibit the 3 transporters are within a narrow range of 0.2 to 0.7 μM. In comparison, methylphenidate inhibited DAT and NET at around 0.1 μM, while it inhibited SERT at around 100 μM. The order of amphetamine potencies was NET (K I= 0.07–0.1 μM), DAT (K I≈ 0.6 μM), and SERT (K I between 20 to 40 μM). The results for methamphetamine were similar to those for amphetamine. In contrast, another amphetamine derivative, MDMA (3–4 methylenedioxymethamphetamine), exhibited higher potency at SERT than at DAT. The human and mouse transporters were similar in their sensitivities to each of the tested drugs (K I values are within 4-fold). Conclusion: The current and previous studies support the following conclusions: 1) cocaine blocks all 3 monoamine transporters at similar concentrations; 2) methylphenidate inhibits DAT and NET well but a 1000-fold higher concentration of the drug is required to inhibit SERT; 3) Amphetamine and methamphetamine are most potent at NET, while being 5- to 9-fold less potent at DAT, and 200- to 500-fold less potent at SERT; 4) MDMA has moderately higher apparent affinity for SERT and NET than for DAT. The relative potencies of a drug to inhibit DAT, NET and SERT suggest which neurotransmitter systems are disrupted the most by each of these stimulants and thus the likely primary mechanism of drug action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cocaine Receptors on Dopamine Transporters Are Related to Self-Administration of Cocaine
Ritz, M. C., Lamb, R. J., Goldberg, S. R., & Kuhar, M. J. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2820058 · Cited by 2,180
Rothman, R. B., Baumann, M. H., Dersch, C. M., Romero, D. V., Rice, K. C., Carroll, F. I., & Partilla, J. S. (2001) · Synapse · doi:10.1002/1098-2396(20010101)39:1<32::aid-syn5>3.0.co;2-3 · Cited by 938
(1994) · Pharmaceutical Design And Development · doi:10.1201/b12597-9 · Cited by 784
Role of Transmitter Uptake Mechanisms in Synaptic Neurotransmission
IVERSEN, L. L. (1971) · British Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1971.tb07066.x · Cited by 772
(1965) · Nature · doi:10.1038/208021c0 · Cited by 611
Cloning and Expression of a Cocaine-Sensitive Rat Dopamine Transporter
Kilty, J. E., Lorang, D., & Amara, S. G. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1948035 · Cited by 594
Molecular characterization of the dopamine transporter
Giros, B., & Caron, M. G. (1993) · Trends in Pharmacological Sciences · doi:10.1016/0165-6147(93)90029-j · Cited by 562
Richelson, E., & Pfenning, M. (1984) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/0014-2999(84)90403-5 · Cited by 526
Monoamine transporters and psychostimulant drugs
Rothman, R. B., & Baumann, M. H. (2003) · European Journal of Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.ejphar.2003.08.054 · Cited by 502
Koe, B. K. (1976) · The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/s0022-3565(25)30726-3 · Cited by 499
Cited by
Neurotransmitter and psychostimulant recognition by the dopamine transporter
Wang, K. H., Penmatsa, A., & Gouaux, E. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14431 · Cited by 425
Ashok, A. H., Mizuno, Y., Volkow, N. D., & Howes, O. D. (2017) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0135 · Cited by 330
Sufficiency of Mesolimbic Dopamine Neuron Stimulation for the Progression to Addiction
Pascoli, V., Terrier, J., Hiver, A., & Lüscher, C. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.017 · Cited by 304
Methamphetamine Use and Cardiovascular Disease: In Search of Answers
Kevil, C. G., Goeders, N. E., Woolard, M. D., Bhuiyan, M. S., Dominic, P., Kolluru, G. K., Arnold, C. L., Traylor, J. G., & Orr, A. W. (2019) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.119.312461 · Cited by 294
Molecular and Cellular Mechanisms of Ecstasy-Induced Neurotoxicity: An Overview
Capela, J. P., Carmo, H., Remião, F., Bastos, M. L., Meisel, A., & Carvalho, F. (2009) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-009-8064-1 · Cited by 290
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, D. D., & Gu, H. H.
- Venue
- BMC Pharmacology
- Published
- 2006-03-03
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6-6
- ISSN
- 1471-2210 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1788048136
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 7.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of the monoamine transporters from human and mouse in their sensitivities to psychostimulant drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2210-6-6
- The paper
- Han, D. D., & Gu, H. H. (2006). Comparison of the monoamine transporters from human and mouse in their sensitivities to psychostimulant drugs. BMC Pharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2210-6-6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.