Cited by 175Celiac Disease Research and ManagementGut microbiota and healthInflammatory Bowel Disease

Antibiotic exposure and the development of coeliac disease: a nationwide case–control study

Open access
Mårild, Karl, Ye, Weimin, Lebwohl, Benjamin, Green, Peter HR, Blaser, Martin J, Card, Tim, Ludvigsson, Jonas F·2013·BMC Gastroenterology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The intestinal microbiota has been proposed to play a pathogenic role in coeliac disease (CD). Although antibiotics are common environmental factors with a profound impact on intestinal microbiota, data on antibiotic use as a risk factor for subsequent CD development are scarce. METHODS: In this population-based case-control study we linked nationwide histopathology data on 2,933 individuals with CD (Marsh stage 3; villous atrophy) to the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register to examine the association between use of systemic antibiotics and subsequent CD. We also examined the association between antibiotic use in 2,118 individuals with inflammation (Marsh 1-2) and in 620 individuals with normal mucosa (Marsh 0) but positive CD serology. All individuals undergoing biopsy were matched for age and sex with 28,262 controls from the population. RESULTS: Antibiotic use was associated with CD (Odds ratio [OR] = 1.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.27-1.53), inflammation (OR = 1.90; 95% CI = 1.72-2.10) and normal mucosa with positive CD serology (OR = 1.58; 95% CI = 1.30-1.92). ORs for prior antibiotic use in CD were similar when we excluded antibiotic use in the last year (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.08-1.56) or restricted to individuals without comorbidity (OR = 1.30; 95% CI = 1.16 - 1.46). CONCLUSIONS: The positive association between antibiotic use and subsequent CD but also with lesions that may represent early CD suggests that intestinal dysbiosis may play a role in the pathogenesis of CD. However, non-causal explanations for this positive association cannot be excluded.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-230x-13-109

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Destruction of protective Bifidobacteria can explain the association between incident celiac disease and previous antibiotic exposure.

    “Destruction of protective Bifidobacteria can explain the association between incident CD and previous antibiotic exposure.57”

    From The Gut Microbiome and the Brain (2014) · cites this paper as [57]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mårild, K., Ye, W., Lebwohl, B., Green, P. H., Blaser, M. J., Card, T., & Ludvigsson, J. F.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
Mårild, Karl
Venue
BMC Gastroenterology
Published
2013-07-08
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
109-109
ISSN
1471-230X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2071445798
Cited by
175
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 1
FWCI
21.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Gastroenterology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • American-Scandinavian Foundation
  • Regionala Forskningsrådet Uppsala/Örebro
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • Vetenskapsrådet
  • Svenska Läkaresällskapet
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK090989)
  • National Center for Research Resources (KL2RR024157)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Celiac Disease Research and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
celiac disease, antibiotic exposure, gut microbiota, dysbiosis, villous atrophy, intestinal inflammation, Marsh classification, pathogenesis, environmental risk factors
MeSH terms
Protein Glutamine gamma Glutamyltransferase 2, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Celiac Disease, Child, Child, Preschool, Enteritis, Female, Gliadin, Humans, Immunoglobulin A, Immunoglobulin G, Infant, Intestinal Mucosa, Intestines, Male, Middle Aged, Transglutaminases, Registries, Risk Factors, Sweden, Case-Control Studies, GTP-Binding Proteins, Metagenome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review