Cited by 222Genetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities

Cytogenetic abnormalities and fragile-x syndrome in Autism Spectrum Disorder

Open access
Reddy, Kavita S·2005·BMC Medical Genetics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Autism is a behavioral disorder with impaired social interaction, communication, and repetitive and stereotypic behaviors. About 5-10 % of individuals with autism have 'secondary' autism in which an environmental agent, chromosome abnormality, or single gene disorder can be identified. Ninety percent have idiopathic autism and a major gene has not yet been identified. We have assessed the incidence of chromosome abnormalities and Fragile X syndrome in a population of autistic patients referred to our laboratory. METHODS: Data was analyzed from 433 patients with autistic traits tested using chromosome analysis and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and/or molecular testing for fragile X syndrome by Southern and PCR methods. RESULTS: The median age was 4 years. Sex ratio was 4.5 males to 1 female [354:79]. A chromosome (cs) abnormality was found in 14/421 [3.33 %] cases. The aberrations were: 4/14 [28%] supernumerary markers; 4/14 [28%] deletions; 1/14 [7%] duplication; 3/14 [21%] inversions; 2/14 [14%] translocations. FISH was performed on 23 cases for reasons other than to characterize a previously identified cytogenetic abnormality. All 23 cases were negative. Fragile-X testing by Southern blots and PCR analysis found 7/316 [2.2 %] with an abnormal result. The mutations detected were: a full mutation (fM) and abnormal methylation in 3 [43 %], mosaic mutations with partial methylation of variable clinical significance in 3 [43%] and a permutation carrier [14%]. The frequency of chromosome and fragile-X abnormalities appears to be within the range in reported surveys (cs 4.8-1.7%, FRAX 2-4%). Limitations of our retrospective study include paucity of behavioral diagnostic information, and a specific clinical criterion for testing. CONCLUSIONS: Twenty-eight percent of chromosome abnormalities detected in our study were subtle; therefore a high resolution cytogenetic study with a scrutiny of 15q11.2q13, 2q37 and Xp23.3 region should be standard practice when the indication is autism. The higher incidence of mosaic fragile-X mutations with partial methylation compared to FRAXA positive population [50% vs 15-40%] suggests that faint bands and variations in the Southern band pattern may occur in autistic patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2350-6-3

Cites

114 of 114 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

9 of the 123 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Jamain S Betancur C Giros B Leboyer M Bourgeron T Genetics of autism: from genome scans to candidate genes Med Sci (Paris) 2003 19 1081 90 Review 14648479
  2. Salmon B Hallmayer J Rogers T Kalaydjieva L Petersen PB Nicholas P Pingree C McMahon W Spiker D Lotspeich L Kraemer H McCague P Dimiceli S Nouri N Pitts T Yang J Hinds D Myers RM Risch N Absence of linkage and linkage disequilibrium to chromosome 15q11-q13 markers in 139 multiplex families with autism Am J Med Genet 1999 88 551 6 10490715
  3. Wolff DJ Clifton K Karr C Charles J Pilot assessment of the subtelomeric regions of children with autism: detection of a 2q deletion Genet Med 2002 4 10 4 11839952 10.1097/00125817-200201000-00002 · DOI
  4. Lassig JP Vachirasomtoon K Hartzell K Leventhal M Courchesne E Courchesne R Lord C Leventhal BL Cook EH Jr Physical mapping of the serotonin 5-HT(7) receptor gene (HTR7) to chromosome 10 and pseudogene (HTR7P) to chromosome 12, and testing of linkage disequilibrium between HTR7 and autistic disorder Am J Med Genet 1999 88 472 5 10490701 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19991015)88:5<472::AID-AJMG7>3.0.CO;2-G · DOI
  5. Flora Tassone Randi HagermanJ David IkléN Pamela DyerN Megan Lampe Rob Willemsen Ben OostraA Annette Taylor FMRP Expression as a Potential Prognostic Indicator in Fragile X Syndrome American Journal of Medical Genetics 1999 84 250 261 10331602
  6. Cohen IL Nolin SL Sudhalter V Ding XH Dobkin CS Brown WT Mosaicism for the FMR1 gene influences adaptive skills development in fragile X-affected males Am J Med Genet 1996 64 365 9 8844082
  7. de Graaff E de Vries BB Willemsen R van Hemel JO Mohkamsing S Oostra BA van den Ouweland AM The fragile X phenotype in a mosaic male with a deletion showing expression of the FMR1 protein in 28% of the cells Am J Med Genet 1996 64 302 8 8844070 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960809)64:2<302::AID-AJMG14>3.0.CO;2-J · DOI
  8. Mannermaa A Pulkkinen L Kajanoja E Ryynanen M Saarikoski S Deletion in the FMR1 gene in a fragile-X male Am J Med Genet 1996 64 293 5 8844068 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19960809)64:2<293::AID-AJMG12>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
  9. Li SY Chen YC Lai TJ Hsu CY Wang YC Molecular and cytogenetic analyses of autism in Taiwan Hum Genet 1993 92 441 445 8244333 10.1007/BF00216447 · DOI
  10. Konstantareas MM Homatidis S Chromosomal abnormalities in a series of children with autistic disorder J Autism Dev Disord 1999 29 275 285 10478727 10.1023/A:1022155201662 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reddy, K. S.
Corresponding author
Reddy, Kavita S
Venue
BMC Medical Genetics
Published
2005-01-18
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
3-3
ISSN
1471-2350 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1493214217
Cited by
222
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 15
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Genetics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, fragile X syndrome, chromosomal abnormalities, fragile X premutation, chromosome 15q11-q13, chromosome 2q37, fluorescence in situ hybridization, karyology, idiopathic autism, translocation
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Child, Preschool, Chromosome Aberrations, Female, Fragile X Syndrome, Humans, Male, Mutation, Nerve Tissue Proteins, RNA-Binding Proteins, Molecular Epidemiology, Cytogenetic Analysis, Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review