Cited by 255Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFamily and Disability Support Research

The UCLA-University of Utah epidemiologic survey of autism: recurrence risk estimates and genetic counseling

EDWARD R. RITVO, Lynn B. Jorde, ANNE MASON-BROTHERS, B. J. Freeman, Carmen Pingree, M B Jones, William M. McMahon, P. Brent Petersen +2 more·1989·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

The authors recently reported, in this journal, an epidemiologic survey of autism in Utah. Twenty (9.7%) of the 207 families ascertained had more than one autistic child. Analyses of these data revealed that autism is 215 times more frequent among the siblings of autistic patients than in the general population. The overall recurrence risk estimate (the chance that each sibling born after an autistic child will develop autism) is 8.6%. If the first autistic child is a male the recurrence risk estimate is 7%, and if a female 14.5%. These new recurrence risk estimates should be made available to all individuals who have autistic children and are interested in family planning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ajp.146.8.1032

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only few earlier studies have had the possibility to calculate the relative recurrence risk.

    “Only few earlier studies have had the possibility to calculate the RR8,27,28.”

    From The Familial Risk of Autism (2014) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Two earlier studies presented self-selected samples and limited family data.

    “Two studies are presenting self-selected samples8,28 and with limited family data.”

    From The Familial Risk of Autism (2014) · cites this paper as [28]

  • Several earlier studies have reported absolute sibling recurrence risk, but absolute risk is a cumulative measure that depends on length of follow-up and differs between populations.

    “Several earlier studies have reported absolute sibling recurrence risk28–34 but absolute risk is a cumulative measure which depends on the length of follow up (higher at age 15 years than at age 5 year) and will differ between populations.”

    From The Familial Risk of Autism (2014) · cites this paper as [28]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
RITVO, E. R., Jorde, L. B., MASON-BROTHERS, A., Freeman, B. J., Pingree, C., Jones, M. B., McMahon, W. M., Petersen, P. B., Jenson, W. R., & Mo, A.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
1989-08-01
Volume
146
Issue
8
Pages
1032-1036
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W12724037
Cited by
255
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 20
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, recurrence risk, siblings of autistic children, genetic counseling, family planning
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Birth Order, Epidemiologic Methods, Family Characteristics, Female, Genetic Counseling, Humans, Intelligence, Male, Religion, Risk Factors, Sex Ratio, Utah

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review