Cited by 134Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumAttachment and Relationship DynamicsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Partner relationship satisfaction and maternal emotional distress in early pregnancy

Open access
Røsand, Gun-Mette B, Slinning, Kari, Eberhard-Gran, Malin, Røysamb, Espen, Tambs, Kristian·2011·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recognition of maternal emotional distress during pregnancy and the identification of risk factors for this distress are of considerable clinical- and public health importance. The mental health of the mother is important both for herself, and for the physical and psychological health of her children and the welfare of the family. The first aim of the present study was to identify risk factors for maternal emotional distress during pregnancy with special focus on partner relationship satisfaction. The second aim was to assess interaction effects between relationship satisfaction and the main predictors. METHODS: Pregnant women enrolled in the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (n = 51,558) completed a questionnaire with questions about maternal emotional distress, relationship satisfaction, and other risk factors. Associations between 37 predictor variables and emotional distress were estimated by multiple linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Relationship dissatisfaction was the strongest predictor of maternal emotional distress (β = 0.25). Other predictors were dissatisfaction at work (β = 0.11), somatic disease (β = 0.11), work related stress (β = 0.10) and maternal alcohol problems in the preceding year (β = 0.09). Relationship satisfaction appeared to buffer the effects of frequent moving, somatic disease, maternal smoking, family income, irregular working hours, dissatisfaction at work, work stress, and mother's sick leave (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Dissatisfaction with the partner relationship is a significant predictor of maternal emotional distress in pregnancy. A good partner relationship can have a protective effect against some stressors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-11-161

Cites

89 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Chokka P Postpartum Depression: Part 1 The Canadian Journal of CME 2002 14 37 48

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Røsand, G.-M. B., Slinning, K., Eberhard-Gran, M., Røysamb, E., & Tambs, K.
Affiliations
Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO)
Corresponding author
Røsand, Gun-Mette B
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2011-03-14
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
161-161
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020642087
Cited by
134
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
9.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • EkstraStiftelsen Helse og Rehabilitering (Stiftelsen Dam)
  • Norges Forskningsråd (151918/S10)
  • National Institutes of Health (n01es085433-000, N01-ES-85433)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (UO1-NS-047537, 047537-01, UO1 NS 047537–01, U01NS047537, 1 UO1 NS 047537‐01)
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (N01 ES85433, N01-ES, UO1 NS 047537-01)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
maternal distress, pregnancy, relationship dissatisfaction, risk factors, buffering effect, occupational stress, job dissatisfaction, somatic diseases, maternal smoking, household income, sick leave, irregular working hours
MeSH terms
Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mothers, Norway, Personal Satisfaction, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Sexual Partners, Stress, Psychological, Cohort Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review