Cited by 80Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesPhytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications

The co-use of conventional drugs and herbs among patients in Norwegian general practice: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Djuv, Ane, Nilsen, Odd Georg, Steinsbekk, Aslak·2013·BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Different patient groups are known to use herbal remedies and conventional drugs concomitantly (co-use). This poses a potential risk of herb-drug interaction through altering the drug's pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics. Little is known about co-use among patients in general practice. The primary aim of this study was to compare patients in general practice that co-use herbal remedies and conventional drugs with those who do not. The secondary aim was to register the herb-drug combinations with potential clinical relevant interactions among the co-users. METHOD: A questionnaire based cross-sectional study conducted in the autumn 2011 in a general practice office with four general practitioners (GPs) and one intern in Western Norway. Adults >18 years who came for an office visit were invited. The questionnaire asked about demographics, herbal use, conventional drug use and communication about herbal use. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare co-users to the other patients. RESULTS: Of the 381 patients who completed the questionnaire, the prevalence of herbal use was 44%, with bilberry (41%), green tea (31%), garlic (27%), Aloe vera (26%) and echinacea (18%) as the most frequently used. Among those using conventional drugs regularly, 108 (45%) co-used herbs. Close to 40% of patients on anticoagulants co-used herbs, with garlic and bilberry as the most frequent herbs. Compared to all other patients, co-users had significantly (p < 0.05) increased odds to be female (adjOR 2.0), age above 70 years (adjOR 3.3), use herbs to treat an illness (adjOR 4.2), use two or more herbs (polyherbacy, adjOR 12.1) and having experienced adverse effects of herbal use (adjOR 37.5). Co-use was also associated with use of analgesics or dermatological drugs (adjOR 5.1 and 7.9 respectively). Three out of four patients did not discuss herbal use with any health care professional. CONCLUSION: A sizable proportion of the GP patients co-used herbs with conventional drugs, also combinations with reported interaction potential or additive effects like anticoagulants and garlic. The low disclosure of herbal use to their GP, polyherbacy and the risk of interactions in vulnerable groups like elderly and chronically ill patients, warrant increased awareness among GPs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6882-13-295

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Concurrent, often undisclosed use of berberine with prescription drugs is common in older adults.

    “Concurrent, often undisclosed use with prescription drugs is common in older adults, yet berberine is far from inert.”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Abstract Results and Discussion (Characteristics of co-users) report frequent herb–drug co-use, with higher co-use among patients over 70. The Results also report that nearly 80% of herb users did not discuss their use with a health professional. These findings concern herbs generally; the paper does not establish that berberine co-use is common or often undisclosed among older adults. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Between 5% and over 80% of older adults combine supplements with prescription drugs, and a substantial proportion carry at least one potential interaction.

    “Population studies report that between 5% and over 80% of older adults combine supplements with prescription drugs, and a substantial proportion carry at least one potential interaction [3,4,5,6,7].”

    From Berberine-Drug Interactions: Mechanisms, Clinical Relevance and Risk Stratification-A Narrative Review (2026) · cites this paper as [7]

    The Background (page unavailable) reports herb–prescription-drug co-use among 31–75% of older adults who use herbs, and the Discussion reports that nearly 40% of patients over 70 in this study co-used herbs and drugs. The paper identifies 18 of 255 herb–drug combinations as having potential clinically relevant interactions, but it does not establish the claimed 5% to over 80% range for older adults or quantify the proportion of older adults with at least one potential interaction. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. van den Berg SJ Serra-Majem L Coppens P Rietjens IM Safety assessment of plant food supplements (PFS) Food Funct 2011 2 760 768 10.1039/c1fo10067j 21804969 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Djuv, A., Nilsen, O. G., & Steinsbekk, A.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Djuv, Ane
Venue
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Published
2013-10-30
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
295-295
ISSN
1472-6882 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2081685648
Cited by
80
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
FWCI
11.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Norges Teknisk-Naturvitenskapelige Universitet
  • Helse Midt-Norge
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Phytochemistry Medicinal Plant Applications
Keywords
herb-drug interactions, general practice patients, anticoagulants, garlic, Vaccinium myrtillus, green tea, Aloe vera, Echinacea, elderly patients, general practitioners
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communication, Cross-Sectional Studies, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Phytotherapy, Middle Aged, Norway, Patients, Plant Extracts, Surveys and Questionnaires, Herbal Medicine, Herb-Drug Interactions, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review