Cited by 65Acupuncture Treatment Research StudiesTraditional Chinese Medicine StudiesTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Acupuncture on GB34 activates the precentral gyrus and prefrontal cortex in Parkinson’s disease

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acupuncture is increasingly used as an additional treatment for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: In this functional magnetic resonance imaging study, brain activation in response to acupuncture in a group of 12 patients with PD was compared with a group of 12 healthy participants. Acupuncture was conducted on a specific acupoint, the right GB 34 (Yanglingquan), which is a frequently used acupoint for motor function treatment in the oriental medical field. RESULTS: Acupuncture stimulation on this acupoint activates the prefrontal cortex, precentral gyrus, and putamen in patients with PD; areas that are known to be impaired in patients with PD. Compared with healthy participants, patients with PD showed significantly higher brain activity in the prefrontal cortex and precentral gyrus, especially visible in the left hemisphere. CONCLUSIONS: The neuroimaging results of our study suggest that in future acupuncture research; the prefrontal cortex as well as the precentral gyrus should be treated for symptoms of Parkinson's disease and that GB 34 seems to be a suitable acupoint. Moreover, acupuncture evoked different brain activations in patients with Parkinson's disease than in healthy participants in our study, stressing the importance of conducting acupuncture studies on both healthy participants as well as patients within the same study, in order to detect acupuncture efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: KCT0001122 at cris.nih.go.kr (registration date: 20140530).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6882-14-336

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Stimulation of ST34 has been associated with activation of neural responses, by activating precentral gyrus and prefrontal cortex associated with Parkinson's disease.

    “Also, in the literature, the stimulation of this point has been associated with the activation of neural responses, by activating precentral gyrus and prefrontal cortex associated with PD [54], [55], [56].”

    From Analysis of patellar reflex in Parkinson disease patients after an acupuncture treatment protocol – Case series study (2025) · cites this paper as [56]

    The Discussion reports activation of the prefrontal cortex and precentral gyrus in patients with Parkinson’s disease, but the stimulated point was GB34, not ST34. The neural-response finding matches; its attribution to ST34 does not. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Yeo, S., Choe, I.-H., van den Noort, M., Bosch, P., Jahng, G.-H., Rosen, B., Kim, S.-H., & Lim, S.
Affiliations
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
  • Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE)
  • Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Lim, Sabina
Venue
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Published
2014-09-15
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
336-336
ISSN
1472-6882 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2139059366
Cited by
64
References
74
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4
FWCI
10.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • VUBIR (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (2007-0054931)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Keywords
acupuncture, Parkinson's disease, prefrontal cortex, precentral gyrus, putamen, brain activation, acupoint stimulation, motor function
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Parkinson Disease, Acupuncture Points, Acupuncture Therapy, Case-Control Studies, Prefrontal Cortex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review