The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Acupuncture for Parkinson’s Disease: Efficacy Evaluation and Mechanisms in the Dopaminergic Neural Circuit
Open accessAbstract
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a chronic and progressive neurodegenerative disease caused by degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra. Existing pharmaceutical treatments offer alleviation of symptoms but cannot delay disease progression and are often associated with significant side effects. Clinical studies have demonstrated that acupuncture may be beneficial for PD treatment, particularly in terms of ameliorating PD symptoms when combined with anti-PD medication, reducing the required dose of medication and associated side effects. During early stages of PD, acupuncture may even be used to replace medication. It has also been found that acupuncture can protect dopaminergic neurons from degeneration via antioxidative stress, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic pathways as well as modulating the neurotransmitter balance in the basal ganglia circuit. Here, we review current studies and reflect on the potential of acupuncture as a novel and effective treatment strategy for PD. We found that particularly during the early stages, acupuncture may reduce neurodegeneration of dopaminergic neurons and regulate the balance of the dopaminergic circuit, thus delaying the progression of the disease. The benefits of acupuncture will need to be further verified through basic and clinical studies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stimulation of ST34 has been associated with activation of neural responses, by activating precentral gyrus and prefrontal cortex associated with Parkinson's disease.
“Also, in the literature, the stimulation of this point has been associated with the activation of neural responses, by activating precentral gyrus and prefrontal cortex associated with PD [54], [55], [56].”
From Analysis of patellar reflex in Parkinson disease patients after an acupuncture treatment protocol – Case series study (2025) · cites this paper as [55]
Section 5.1 reports activation of the prefrontal cortex and precentral gyrus in patients with Parkinson’s disease, but attributes it to stimulation of GB34, not ST34. The cited paper therefore identifies a different acupuncture point for the claimed response; page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 120 · Cited by 68
Research works printed but not linked: 112
- 10.1142/S0192415X15500263 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2016.11.010 · DOI
- 10.1002/mds.25292 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cger.2019.08.002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61393-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mds.26125 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ctim.2017.08.005 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jns.2014.04.016 · DOI
- 10.3389/fneur.2020.00917 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00102 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102383 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtcms.2019.01.005 · DOI
- 10.1002/mds.10473 · DOI
- 10.1002/mds.21993 · DOI
- D. D. Webster, 1968, Critical analysis of the disability in Parkinson’s disease, Modern Treatment, 5, 257
- 10.1002/mds.27602 · DOI
- 10.1016/bs.irn.2017.05.037 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0155613 · DOI
- 10.1002/mds.26597 · DOI
- 10.3389/fneur.2019.01114 · DOI
- 10.1002/mds.10134 · DOI
- 10.1002/mds.20503 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jams.2016.12.007 · DOI
- 10.1136/acupmed-2015-010811 · DOI
- L. Wang, 2002, Effect of acupuncture on the auditory evoked brain stem potential in Parkinson’s disease, Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine, 22, 15
- 10.1097/MD.0000000000013434 · DOI
- 10.1089/acm.2016.0250 · DOI
- 10.1089/acm.2006.12.395 · DOI
- 10.1089/acm.2015.0078 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0254-6272(09)60004-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11655-013-1431-9 · DOI
- 10.13702/j.1000-0607.190627 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07477.x · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0027566 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2019.134698 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.020 · DOI
- 10.1590/S1415-475738120140137 · DOI
- 10.1097/MD.0000000000005836 · DOI
- 10.1016/s0254-6272(15)30164-3 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00109 · DOI
- X. S. Zeng, 2018, Neurotoxin-induced animal models of Parkinson disease: pathogenic mechanism and assessment, ASN Neuro, 10
- 10.1016/j.neuron.2006.09.026 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0301-0082(99)00067-2 · DOI
- 10.4061/2011/708404 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0019790 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001756-200306110-00015 · DOI
- 10.1179/016164109X12537002794165 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gene.2011.03.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.gene.2012.12.002 · DOI
- 10.1002/pmic.200700955 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0064403 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.04.068 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.05.012 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-030-34461-0_51 · DOI
- 10.1038/srep19714 · DOI
- 10.4103/1673-5374.224380 · DOI
- X. Chen, 2008, The protect effect of baicalin on the substantial nigra dopaminergic neuron in Parkinson’s rats induced by rotenone, Zhongfeng yu Shenjing Jibing Zazhi, 2, 174
- 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.03.105 · DOI
- 10.1179/016164109X12537002794282 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0169-328X(02)00513-2 · DOI
- 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.06.007 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.08.015 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0014-4886(02)00031-6 · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms18091846 · DOI
- 10.3389/fnins.2019.00496 · DOI
- 10.3109/00207454.2011.591515 · DOI
- 10.1155/2019/3612587 · DOI
- 10.1155/2017/3971675 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12576-017-0547-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.10.089 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sjbs.2019.07.003 · DOI
- 10.1097/WNR.0000000000000709 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12035-018-1194-6 · DOI
- 10.1155/2014/937601 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12035-016-0258-8 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrdp.2017.13 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gene.2018.03.086 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1560-11.2011 · DOI
- 10.1517/14740338.2011.579898 · DOI
- 10.1093/emboj/21.8.1967 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuint.2014.11.008 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb04640.x · DOI
- 10.3390/ijms140510122 · DOI
- 10.1016/B978-0-12-420170-5.00006-4 · DOI
- 10.1002/glia.10154 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11481-013-9435-y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.018 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/glia.22303 · DOI
- 10.3748/wjg.v21.i27.8304 · DOI
- 10.1089/acm.2007.7040 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.07.012 · DOI
- 10.1111/cns.12108 · DOI
- 10.1002/mds.22673 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1755-5949.2012.00363.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fnagi.2018.00206 · DOI
- 10.3109/00207450903316527 · DOI
- 10.1080/00207450802336774 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2017.10.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbr.2012.09.047 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.06.024 · DOI
- 10.1037/a0018931 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.11.028 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neulet.2012.05.021 · DOI
- 10.1002/hbm.20622 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.12.060 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4065/mcp.2011.0045 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41583-018-0002-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a009621 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1447-0594.2010.00588.x · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa033447 · DOI
- 10.3233/JPD-2012-120103 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, Y., Zhang, Z., Qin, S., Fan, W., Li, W., Liu, J., Wang, S., Xu, Z., & Zhao, M.
- Affiliations
- Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (CN)
- Suzuka University of Medical Science (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Xu, Zhifang
- Zhao, Meidan
- Venue
- Neural Plasticity
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2021-06-15
- Volume
- 2021
- Pages
- 1-23
- ISSN
- 1687-5443 (ISSN-L)
- 2090-5904
- PMC
- PMC8221898
- OpenAlex
- W3166978051
- Cited by
- 68
- References
- 120
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7
- FWCI
- 2.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Neural Plasticity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Scientific Research Projects of Tianjin Education Commission (2017KJ150, 81904295, 81804186, 82074534)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (2017KJ150, 81904295, 81804186, 82074534)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
- Keywords
- acupuncture, Parkinson's disease, dopaminergic neurons, substantia nigra, basal ganglia circuitry, neuroprotection, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, apoptosis, neurotransmitter balance, medication reduction, disease progression
- MeSH terms
- Neuroinflammatory Diseases, Antiparkinson Agents, Basal Ganglia, Clinical Trials as Topic, Combined Modality Therapy, Dopamine, Humans, Nerve Net, Parkinson Disease, Acupuncture Therapy, Bibliometrics, Treatment Outcome, Apoptosis, Oxidative Stress, alpha-Synuclein, Dopaminergic Neurons, Protein Aggregation, Pathological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review