Cited by 65Complementary and Alternative Medicine StudiesOvarian function and disordersTraditional Chinese Medicine Studies

A survey of the use of complementary medicine by a self-selected community group of Australian women with polycystic ovary syndrome

Open access
Arentz, Susan, Smith, Caroline Anne, Abbott, Jason Anthony, Bensoussan, Alan·2014·BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a complex reproductive endocrinopathy affecting up to 20% of reproductive aged women. Whilst there are effective pharmaceutical treatment options, women with PCOS have expressed a strong desire for alternatives. This study investigates the use and attitudes of women with PCOS towards complementary medicine (CM). METHODS: Women as members of PCOS support groups responded to an anonymous on-line survey which examined rates and patterns of use for CM's, areas of health for use, perceptions of effectiveness, safety and demographic features. Data collection targeted women with PCOS using two consumer support groups. The first group self-selected following direct email to members of a land based consumer support group, the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Association of Australia (POSAA). The second sample was generated through the electronic social network Facebook, using a snowball technique. Two surveys, identical in content, were collected by cloud based Survey Monkey. Data were described and associations between the variables, 'reasons for use' and 'perceptions of effectiveness' were explored. Non-response bias was assessed using a continuum of resistance model. RESULTS: 493 women participated in the study; 91.1% response rate from the POSAA group. Over 70% reported use of complementary medicine, usually nutritional and herbal supplements and 76.6% of CM users reported consultation with a complementary practitioner. Many participants were using CM to treat PCOS however most were using it to concurrently treat a range of health conditions, describing women's desire for more than single symptom management. Disadvantages for CM use were cited by 71% of respondents. Women using complementary medicine with specific treatment goals in mind reported greater self-perceived effectiveness, suggesting that informed use may improve women's satisfaction with CM. Adverse reactions were reported by 12.2% of women and the need for further research into adverse reactions for CM's was identified. Demographic and PCOS characteristics were similar to clinical populations of PCOS and non-response bias was shown as not significant. CONCLUSION: This study describes the prevalence of use for complementary medicine by women with PCOS as over 70% and adds to our understanding of women's experiences with CM and their motivations for use of CM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6882-14-472

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/14/472/prepub

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arentz, S., Smith, C. A., Abbott, J. A., & Bensoussan, A.
Affiliations
  • Western Sydney University (AU)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
Corresponding author
Arentz, Susan
Venue
BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine
Published
2014-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
472-472
ISSN
1472-6882 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062481575
Cited by
65
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 3
FWCI
5.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Western Sydney
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Traditional Chinese Medicine Studies
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, complementary therapy, women's health, dietary supplements, herbal supplements, perceived effectiveness, adverse effects, reasons for use, nonresponse bias
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Complementary Therapies, Attitude to Health, Australia, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Perception, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome, Prevalence, Health Care Surveys, Dietary Supplements, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review