Cited by 19

Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy from randomized controlled trials of 1 and 2 mg nicotine bitartrate lozenges (Nicotinell®)

Dautzenberg, Bertrand, Nides, Mitchell, Kienzler, Jean-Luc, Callens, Anne·2007·BMC Clinical Pharmacology

Abstract

Background: The use of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) can almost double the chances of success for smokers to quit. Nevertheless, there is still a considerable number of cessation attempts that are made without any treatment. This novel oral formulation, (lozenge containing nicotine bitartrate dihydrate) has been developed to enlarge the offer for efficient smoking cessation drug therapies, assuming that increasing treatment options will bring more smokers to find the support they personally need to stop smoking. Methods: Three pharmacokinetic (PK), one safety and two efficacy studies were carried out with Nicotinell lozenges. PK trials were: (1) a single-dose, three-way crossover study comparing 1 and 2 mg lozenges with 2 mg nicotine gum; (2) a multiple-dose, two-way crossover study comparing 1 mg lozenge with 2 mg gum; (3) a multiple-dose, three-way crossover study comparing 1 and 2 mg lozenges with 4 mg gum. Safety trial: (4) a single dose study to assess the safety of swallowing up to 12 lozenges containing 1 mg nicotine. Efficacy trials: two efficacy studies in (5) France and (6) the USA, including more than 900 smokers followed-up for up to one year, conducted with the 1 mg lozenge. Results: The results of the individual PK trials showed that the 1 mg Nicotinell lozenge is bioequivalent to 2 mg polacrilex gum, as demonstrated by similar blood PK parameters (t max, C max, AUC). The 2 mg lozenge was found to deliver quantities of nicotine that were intermediate between those delivered by 2 and 4 mg polacrilex gum. The short-term efficacy of the 1 mg lozenge in comparison with placebo was also demonstrated with significantly more subjects continuously abstinent from smoking with active lozenges on week 6 in two different populations: moderate to heavy smokers (FTND between 4 and 7) OR = 1.72 [95% CI: 1.05–2.80]; heavy to very heavy smokers (FTND 6 and over) OR = 2.87 [95% CI: 1.18–6.97]. Nicotinell lozenges were found to be safe with mainly mild and reversible adverse events. The safety of the 1 mg lozenge formulation, even when misused was also demonstrated. Conclusion: The data presented in this review demonstrate high nicotine bioavailability, excellent safety profile and proven short-term efficacy of Nicotinell lozenges. At nominal equivalent doses 1 and 2 mg Nicotinell lozenges were shown to deliver larger amounts of bioavailable nicotine compared to the nicotine polacrilex gum. According to the data developed here, the systemic exposure to nicotine could be ranked: 4 mg polacrilex gum > 2 mg Nicotinell lozenge > 1 mg Nicotinell lozenge = 2 mg polacrilex gum. Adverse events observed during the clinical trials were mild or moderate in severity, transient and completely reversible. With respect to efficacy in smoking cessation, significantly higher continuous abstinence rates were achieved with lozenge compared to placebo. In conclusion, Nicotinell lozenges offer a valuable addition to the therapeutic armamentarium available for smoking cessation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6904-7-11

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Hecht SS Tobacco smoke carcinogens and lung cancer J Natl Cancer Inst 1999 91 1194 1210 10413421 10.1093/jnci/91.14.1194 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chen Z Boreham J Smoking and cardiovascular disease Semin Vasc Med 2002 2 243 252 16222617 10.1055/s-2002-35392 · DOI
  3. Kamholz SL Pulmonary and cardiovascular consequences of smoking Med Clin North Am 2004 88 1415 1430 ix-x 15464105 10.1016/j.mcna.2004.07.008 · DOI
  4. West R DiMarino ME Gitchell J McNeill A Impact of UK policy initiatives on use of medicines to aid smoking cessation Tob Control 2005 14 166 171 15923466 10.1136/tc.2004.008649 PMC1748027 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Shiffman S Gitchell J Pinney JM Burton SL Kemper KE Lara EA Public health benefit of over-the-counter nicotine medications Tob Control 1997 6 306 310 9583628 PMC1759603
  6. Law MR Hackshaw AK Environmental tobacco smoke Br Med Bull 1996 52 22 34 8746294
  7. Schroeder SA What to do with a patient who smokes JAMA 2005 294 482 487 16046655 10.1001/jama.294.4.482 · DOI
  8. Henningfield JE Fant RV Buchhalter AR Stitzer ML Pharmacotherapy for nicotine dependence CA Cancer J Clin 2005 55 281 299 16166074
  9. McNeill A Foulds J Bates C Regulation of nicotine replacement therapies (NRT): a critique of current practice Addiction 2001 96 1757 1768 11784468 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961217575.x · DOI
  10. Fiore MC Bailey WC Cohen SJ Dorfman SF Goldstein MG Gritz ER Heyman RB Jaen CR Kottke TE Lando HA A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: A US Public Health Service report JAMA 2000 283 3244 3254 10866874 10.1001/jama.283.24.3244 · DOI
  11. Shiffman S Fant RV Buchhalter AR Gitchell JG Henningfield JE Nicotine delivery systems Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2005 2 563 577 16296775 10.1517/17425247.2.3.563 · DOI
  12. Le Houezec J Role of nicotine pharmacokinetics in nicotine addiction and nicotine replacement therapy: a review Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2003 7 811 819 12971663
  13. Burton SL Gitchell JG Shiffman S Use of FDA-approved pharmacological treatments for tobacco dependence – United States, 1984–1998 MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2000 49 665 668 10943254
  14. Shiffman S Di Marino ME Pillitteri JL The effectiveness of nicotine patch and nicotine lozenge in very heavy smokers J Subst Abuse Treat 2005 28 49 55 15723732 10.1016/j.jsat.2004.10.006 · DOI
  15. Shiffman S Nicotine lozenge efficacy in light smokers Drug Alcohol Depend 2005 77 311 314 15734231 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2004.08.026 · DOI
  16. Shiffman S Dresler CM Rohay JM Successful treatment with a nicotine lozenge of smokers with prior failure in pharmacological therapy Addiction 2004 99 83 92 14678066 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2004.00576.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Demazieres A Luthringer R Coppel E Gilles C Fleury C Roegel JC Delarue A Laur C Lagrue G Ability of a new oral nicotine substitute to reduce smoking urge in moderate smokers Addict Behav 2005 31 537 543 15964703 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.017 · DOI
  18. Choi JH Dresler CM Norton MR Strahs KR Pharmacokinetics of a nicotine polacrilex lozenge Nicotine Tob Res 2003 5 635 644 14577980 10.1080/1462220031000158690 · DOI
  19. Heatherton TF Kozlowski LT Frecker RC Fagerstrom KO The Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire Br J Addict 1991 86 1119 1127 1932883 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x · DOI · Paper page
  20. Benowitz N Porchet H Jacob P Wonnacott S, Russell MA, Stolerman IP Pharmacokinetics, metabolism and pharmacodynamics of nicotine Nicotine psychopharmacology: molecular, cellular and behavioral aspects 1990 Oxford: Oxford University Press 112 157
  21. Benowitz NL Jacob P 3rd Savanapridi C Determinants of nicotine intake while chewing nicotine polacrilex gum Clin Pharmacol Ther 1987 41 467 473 3829583
  22. Benowitz NL Pharmacology of nicotine: addiction and therapeutics Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1996 36 597 613 8725403 10.1146/annurev.pa.36.040196.003121 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Lunell E Molander L Andersson M Relative bioavailability of nicotine from a nasal spray in infectious rhinitis and after use of a topical decongestant Eur J Clin Pharmacol 1995 48 71 75 7542589 10.1007/BF00202176 PMC7087527 · DOI
  24. Fagerstrom KO Efficacy of nicotine chewing gum: a review Prog Clin Biol Res 1988 261 109 128 3289000
  25. Henningfield JE Stapleton JM Benowitz NL Grayson RF London ED Higher levels of nicotine in arterial than in venous blood after cigarette smoking Drug Alcohol Depend 1993 33 23 29 8370337 10.1016/0376-8716(93)90030-T · DOI
  26. George TP O'Malley SS Current pharmacological treatments for nicotine dependence Trends Pharmacol Sci 2004 25 42 48 14723978 10.1016/j.tips.2003.11.003 · DOI
  27. Cohen LM Collins FL Jr Britt DM The effect of chewing gum on tobacco withdrawal Addict Behav 1997 22 769 773 9426794 10.1016/S0306-4603(96)00072-X · DOI
  28. Murray RP Bailey WC Daniels K Bjornson WM Kurnow K Connett JE Nides MA Kiley JP Safety of nicotine polacrilex gum used by 3,094 participants in the Lung Health Study Chest 1996 109 438 445 8620719
  29. Hu T Sung HY Keeler TE Marciniak M Cigarette consumption and sales of nicotine replacement products Tob Control 2000 9 II60 63 10841593 PMC1766286
  30. Tonnesen P Fryd V Hansen M Helsted J Gunnersen AB Forchammer H Stockner M Two and four mg nicotine chewing gum and group counselling in smoking cessation: an open, randomized, controlled trial with a 22 month follow-up Addict Behav 1988 13 17 27 3284283 10.1016/0306-4603(88)90021-4 · DOI
  31. Marsh HS Dresler CM Choi JH Targett DA Gamble ML Strahs KR Safety profile of a nicotine lozenge compared with that of nicotine gum in adult smokers with underlying medical conditions: a 12-week, randomized, open-label study Clin Ther 2005 27 1571 1587 16330293 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.10.008 · DOI
  32. Shiffman S Hughes JR Di Marino ME Sweeney CT Patterns of over-the-counter nicotine gum use: persistent use and concurrent smoking Addiction 2003 98 1747 1753 14651507 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2003.00575.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dautzenberg, B., Nides, M., Kienzler, J.-L., & Callens, A.
Venue
BMC Clinical Pharmacology
Published
2007-10-08
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
1472-6904
Cited by
19
References
2
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review