CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 150Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyEmpathy and Medical EducationWorkplace Spirituality and Leadership

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Medical students, spirituality and religiosity-results from the multicenter study SBRAME

Open access
for the SBRAME Collaborators, Lucchetti, Giancarlo, de Oliveira, Leandro Romani, Koenig, Harold G, Leite, José Roberto, Lucchetti, Alessandra LG·2013·BMC Medical Education
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-162PMC PMC4029451
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the relationship between spirituality/religiosity (S/R) and the attitudes, beliefs and experiences of medical students in Brazil with respect to S/R in their undergraduate training and clinical practice. METHODS: SBRAME (Spirituality and Brazilian Medical Education) is a multicenter study involving 12 Brazilian medical schools with 5950 medical students (MS). Participants completed a questionnaire that collected information on socio-demographic data and S/R in their undergraduate training and practice. RESULTS: Of all MS, 3630 participated in the survey (61.0%). The sample was 53.8% women and the mean age was 22.5 years. The majority of MS believed that spirituality has an impact on patients' health (71.2%) and that this impact was positive (68.2%). The majority also wanted to address S/R in their clinical practice (58.0%) and considered it relevant (75.3%), although nearly one-half (48.7%) felt unprepared to do so. Concerning their training, most MS reported that they had never participated in a "spirituality and health" activity (81.0%) and that their medical instructors had never or rarely addressed this issue (78.3%). The majority also believed that they should be prepared to address spiritual issues related to the health of their patients (61.6%) and that this content should be included in the medical curriculum (62.6%). CONCLUSION: There is a large gap between MS attitudes and expectations and the S/R training that they are receiving during their undergraduate training. The majority of MS surveyed believe that patients should have their beliefs addressed and that these beliefs could have important effects on their health and the doctor-patient relationship. These results should stimulate discussion about the place that S/R training should have in the medical curriculum.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1472-6920-13-162

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 40 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mariotti L, Lucchetti G, Dantas M, Banin V, Fumelli F, Padula N: Spirituality and medicine: views and opinions of teachers in a Brazilian medical school. Med Teach. 2011, 33: 339-340.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–150 of 150

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Collaborators, F. T. S., Lucchetti, G., de Oliveira, L. R., Koenig, H. G., Leite, J. R., & Lucchetti, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (BR)
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
  • Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Corresponding author
Lucchetti, Giancarlo
ORCID
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2013-12
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
162-162
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1472-6920-13-162
PMC
PMC4029451
OpenAlex
W1985542169
Cited by
150
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Empathy and Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Workplace Spirituality and Leadership
Keywords
spirituality, religiosity, medical students, medical education, spiritual care, medical curriculum, physician-patient relationship, attitudes toward spirituality, Brazil
MeSH terms
Brazil, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Collection, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion and Medicine, Students, Medical, Spirituality, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review