Religion, Conscience, and Controversial Clinical Practices
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: There is a heated debate about whether health professionals may refuse to provide treatments to which they object on moral grounds. It is important to understand how physicians think about their ethical rights and obligations when such conflicts emerge in clinical practice. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a stratified, random sample of 2000 practicing U.S. physicians from all specialties by mail. The primary criterion variables were physicians' judgments about their ethical rights and obligations when patients request a legal medical procedure to which the physician objects for religious or moral reasons. These procedures included administering terminal sedation in dying patients, providing abortion for failed contraception, and prescribing birth control to adolescents without parental approval. RESULTS: A total of 1144 of 1820 physicians (63%) responded to our survey. On the basis of our results, we estimate that most physicians believe that it is ethically permissible for doctors to explain their moral objections to patients (63%). Most also believe that physicians are obligated to present all options (86%) and to refer the patient to another clinician who does not object to the requested procedure (71%). Physicians who were male, those who were religious, and those who had personal objections to morally controversial clinical practices were less likely to report that doctors must disclose information about or refer patients for medical procedures to which the physician objected on moral grounds (multivariate odds ratios, 0.3 to 0.5). CONCLUSIONS: Many physicians do not consider themselves obligated to disclose information about or refer patients for legal but morally controversial medical procedures. Patients who want information about and access to such procedures may need to inquire proactively to determine whether their physicians would accommodate such requests.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most spiritual needs of medical and psychiatric patients currently go unmet.
“Studies of medical and psychiatric patients and those with terminal illnesses report that the vast majority have such needs, and most of those needs currently go unmet [579, 580].”
From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [579]
The Discussion (page unavailable) concerns physicians’ willingness to disclose information about or refer patients for morally controversial treatments, not whether patients’ spiritual needs are met. Searches for spiritual needs among medical and psychiatric patients, including terminally ill patients, found no passage addressing that claim. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredStudies of medical and psychiatric patients and those with terminal illnesses report that the vast majority have spiritual needs related to medical or psychiatric illness.
“Studies of medical and psychiatric patients and those with terminal illnesses report that the vast majority have such needs, and most of those needs currently go unmet [579, 580].”
From Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications (2012) · cites this paper as [579]
The Methods and Questionnaire sections describe a survey of physicians about religious objections to controversial clinical practices, not studies of patients’ spiritual needs. A search for spiritual needs among medical, psychiatric, and terminally ill patients found no passage reporting that the vast majority have such needs. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Personal religious orientation and prejudice.
Āllport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0021212 · Cited by 4,177 · see citing works
Four Models of the Physician-Patient Relationship
Emanuel, E. J. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03480160079038 · Cited by 2,453 · see citing works
Intrinsic/Extrinsic Measurement: I/E-Revised and Single-Item Scales
Gorsuch, R. L., & McPherson, S. E. (1989) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1386745 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
Personal Religious Orientation and Prejudice.
Āllport, G. W., & Ross, J. M. (1967) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.5.4.432 · Cited by 836 · see citing works
Quill, T. E., & Brody, H. (1996) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-125-9-199611010-00010 · Cited by 721 · see citing works
Religion index for psychiatric research
Koenig, H. G., Parkerson, G. R., & Meador, K. G. (1997) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.154.6.885b · Cited by 714 · see citing works
A validated intrinsic religious motivation scale
Hoge, R. (1972) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.2307/1384677 · Cited by 704 · see citing works
Four models of the physician-patient relationship
Emanuel, E. J. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.267.16.2221 · Cited by 529 · see citing works
Conscientious objection in medicine
Savulescu, J. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7536.294 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Curlin, F. A., Chin, M. H., Sellergren, S. A., Roach, C. J., & Lantos, J. D. (2006) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000207434.12450.ef · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Self-citationReligious characteristics of U.S. physicians: A national survey
Curlin, F. A., Lantos, J. D., Roach, C. J., Sellergren, S. A., & Chin, M. H. (2005) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0119.x · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Does Religious Commitment Contribute to Individual Life Satisfaction?
Ellison, C. G., Gay, D. A., & Glass, T. A. (1989) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2579222 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Thomasma, D. C. (1983) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-98-2-243 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
The Celestial Fire of Conscience — Refusing to Deliver Medical Care
Charo, R. A. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp058112 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Cantor, J. D., & Baum, K. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsb042263 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Metaphors and models of doctor-patient relationships: Their implications for autonomy
Childress, J. F., & Siegler, M. A. (1984) · Metamedicine · doi:10.1007/bf00489243 · Cited by 83 · see citing works
Siegler, M. A. (1981) · PubMed · Cited by 64 · see citing works
Crisis of Conscience: Reconciling Religious Health Care Providers' Beliefs and Patients' Rights
White, K. A. (1999) · Stanford Law Review · doi:10.2307/1229534 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Vischer RK. Conscience in context: pharmacist rights and the eroding moral marketplace. Stanford Law Pol Rev 2006; 17:83-119. Health Care Right of Conscience Act, 745 Ill. Comp. Stat. § 70/1-14.
- attitudes and self-reported behaviors regard- ing religion and spirituality in the clinical encounter. Med Care 2006;44:446-53.
- religious commitment contribute to indi- vidual life satisfaction? Soc Forces 1989; 68:100-23.
- Groves RM, Fowler FJ, Couper MP, Lepkowski JM, Singer E, Tourangeau R. Survey methodology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley, 2004.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Religion, Spirituality, and Health: The Research and Clinical Implications
Koenig, H. G. (2012) · ISRN Psychiatry · doi:10.5402/2012/278730 · Cited by 2,423 · see citing works
Curlin, F. A., Lawrence, R. E., Odell, S., Chin, M. H., Lantos, J. D., Koenig, H. G., & Meador, K. G. (2007) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06122088 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Self-citationSpirituality in Medical School Curricula: Findings from a National Survey
Koenig, H. G., Hooten, E. G., Lindsay-Calkins, E., & Meador, K. G. (2010) · The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine · doi:10.2190/pm.40.4.c · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Medical students, spirituality and religiosity-results from the multicenter study SBRAME
Collaborators, F. T. S., Lucchetti, G., de Oliveira, L. R., Koenig, H. G., Leite, J. R., & Lucchetti, A. L. (2013) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/1472-6920-13-162 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Menegatti-Chequini, M. C., Gonçalves, J. P. B., Leão, F. C., Peres, M. F. P., & Vallada, H. (2016) · BJPsych Open · doi:10.1192/bjpo.bp.116.002816 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Menegatti-Chequini, M. C., Maraldi, E. D. O., Peres, M. F. P., Leão, F. C., & Vallada, H. (2019) · Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2447 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Shin, J. H., Yoon, J. D., Rasinski, K. A., Koenig, H. G., Meador, K. G., & Curlin, F. A. (2013) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-012-2224-0 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Curlin, F. A., Lawrence, R. E., Chin, M. H., & Lantos, J. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Chicago (US)
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2007-02-08
- Volume
- 356
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 593-600
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- PMC
- PMC2867473
- OpenAlex
- W2116738317
- Cited by
- 397
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 30 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 34.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Greenwall Foundation (1 K23 AT002749)
- National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine
- National Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (K23AT002749)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
- Keywords
- physician refusal of treatment, physician ethical obligations, referral, palliative sedation, abortion, parental consent, physician attitudes, religion and medicine
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Legal, Contraception, Cross-Sectional Studies, Ethics, Medical, Female, Humans, Male, Morals, Physicians, Surveys and Questionnaires, Religion and Medicine, United States, Refusal to Treat, Suicide, Assisted, Personal Autonomy, Bioethical Issues, Ethics, Clinical, Paternalism
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review