The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The main objective of this research is to identify, categorize, and analyze barriers perceived by physicians to the adoption of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in order to provide implementers with beneficial intervention options. METHODS: A systematic literature review, based on research papers from 1998 to 2009, concerning barriers to the acceptance of EMRs by physicians was conducted. Four databases, "Science", "EBSCO", "PubMed" and "The Cochrane Library", were used in the literature search. Studies were included in the analysis if they reported on physicians' perceived barriers to implementing and using electronic medical records. Electronic medical records are defined as computerized medical information systems that collect, store and display patient information. RESULTS: The study includes twenty-two articles that have considered barriers to EMR as perceived by physicians. Eight main categories of barriers, including a total of 31 sub-categories, were identified. These eight categories are: A) Financial, B) Technical, C) Time, D) Psychological, E) Social, F) Legal, G) Organizational, and H) Change Process. All these categories are interrelated with each other. In particular, Categories G (Organizational) and H (Change Process) seem to be mediating factors on other barriers. By adopting a change management perspective, we develop some barrier-related interventions that could overcome the identified barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the positive effects of EMR usage in medical practices, the adoption rate of such systems is still low and meets resistance from physicians. This systematic review reveals that physicians may face a range of barriers when they approach EMR implementation. We conclude that the process of EMR implementation should be treated as a change project, and led by implementers or change managers, in medical practices. The quality of change management plays an important role in the success of EMR implementation. The barriers and suggested interventions highlighted in this study are intended to act as a reference for implementers of Electronic Medical Records. A careful diagnosis of the specific situation is required before relevant interventions can be determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The need for recognised standards for the provision of e-health systems was described by many studies [16, 18, 20, 28, 33, 36, 48, 49, 51].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“An absence or inadequacy of legislation and policies and liability concerns may hamper the implementation of e-health systems at the organisational and health professional level [17, 18, 20, 51].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Incentives by government organisations and other external stakeholders may facilitate adoption by healthcare organisations [17, 18, 39, 48, 49].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The fit between e-health systems and workflows in particular was discussed by the majority of studies [15, 16, 18, 21, 23, 25, 27, 28, 36, 40, 41, 43, 47–50, 52, 55–58].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“and a lack of involvement can be a barrier to implementation [18, 53].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The quality of project management during the implementation period [18], careful study of the downstream effects of implementation on workflow [55], additional training [31, 55], the adaptability of technologies to fit with roles, tasks and workflows [37] and dedicated technical support staff [31] are suggested as strategies to reduce barriers related to disruptions to workflow, roles and respons”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Generally, access to appropriate, high-quality, well-funded, and easily available training was reported as a facilitator to implementation, whereas it was reported as a barrier when it was non-existent or existent but inadequate [15, 16, 18, 20, 23, 25, 28, 31, 37, 43, 45, 50, 51, 53–58].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Physician resistance to e-health implementation is reported by several studies to be related to fear of [18], dissatisfaction with [18] and uncertainty over [43, 47] new roles and responsibilities, created by the introduction of e-health systems [18].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The designation of champions [18, 20, 25, 29, 31, 32, 36, 37, 39, 51, 54, 58] may be important for implementation success.”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Specifically, fears over a loss of autonomy [16, 18, 27, 34, 37, 39, 43], concerns about liability [16, 18, 22, 37, 43, 51], concerns over patient privacy and security being compromised [16, 18, 20, 23, 24, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51–53, 56, 57], and perceived threats to patient and health professional relationships [18, 25, 27, 28, 31, 34, 37–39, 41, 43, 54, 57] through the”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The work of planning includes the delineation of roles and responsibilities [43], securing time to invest system selection and procurement [18], evaluating other concomitant policy and process changes [40], needs assessment and analysis, development of a business plan [44], early identification and engagement of champions [31], involving end users [16, 27, 41, 51], establishing a guiding”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Healthcare professionals’ computer skills, abilities and experience were cited by several studies as influencing implementation and acceptance of e-health systems [16, 18, 25, 28, 34, 36, 37, 41, 43, 52, 57].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“However, the current evidence base is dominated by studies from the US and given the major differences in the social, political and economic foundations of their healthcare system, it is important to explore whether these issues are relevant in other contexts.”
From Exploring the implementation of an electronic record into a maternity unit: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Empirical evidence that explores the benefits, barriers and disadvantages of implementing electronic records has recently been summarised in a systematic review [8] of 22 studies, which identified technical issues alongside financial and time constraints as the most frequently reported barriers associated with electronic record implementation.”
From Exploring the implementation of an electronic record into a maternity unit: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The 93 papers addressed a wide range of eHealth applications. 57 targeted the EHR/EMR, which was defined as computerized medical information systems that collect, store, and display patient information [24].”
From Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review (2013) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Journal of Family Practice
Geyman, J. P. (1997) · American Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1080/01926189708251066 · Cited by 3,088
Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., & Nykänen, P. (2008) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001 · Cited by 1,374
Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians
DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Rao, S. R., Donelan, K., Ferris, T. G., Jha, A., Kaushal, R., Levy, D. E., Rosenbaum, S., Shields, A. E., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0802005 · Cited by 1,111
Physicians’ Use Of Electronic Medical Records: Barriers And Solutions
Miller, R. H., & Sim, I. (2004) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116 · Cited by 869
(2002) · Computers in health care · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0069-4 · Cited by 425
Cavicchi, C., & Vagnoni, E. (2006) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.016 · Cited by 361
Physician acceptance of information technologies: Role of perceived threat to professional autonomy
Walter, Z. D., & Lopez, M. S. (2008) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.004 · Cited by 331
Pizziferri, L., Kittler, A. F., Volk, L. A., Honour, M. M., Gupta, S., Wang, S. J., Wang, T., Lippincott, M. F., Li, Q., & Bates, D. W. (2004) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009 · Cited by 283
Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey
Lærum, H., Ellingsen, G., & Faxvaag, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7325.1344 · Cited by 226
Earnest, M. A., Ross, S. E., Wittevrongel, L., Moore, L. A., & Lin, C.-T. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1479 · Cited by 207
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Terry AL, Thorpe CF, Giles GG, Brown JB, Harris SB, Reid GJ, Thind A, Stewart M: Implementing Electronic Health Records. Canadian Family Physician. 2008, 54: 730-736.
- Simon SR, Kalshal R, Cleary PD, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Oray EJ, Burdick E, Poon EG, Batees WW: Physicians and Electronic Health Records "A Statewide Survey. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2007, 167 (5): 507-512. 10.1001/archinte.167.5.507. · DOI
- European Commission: Study on the Legal Framework for Interoperable eHealth in Europe. 2009, Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General Information Society
- McCarthy C, Eastman D: Change Management Strategies for an Effective EMR implementations. HIMSS Chicago. 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–400 of 848
Boonstra, A., Vos, J. F. J., & Rosenberg, L. (2022) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.014 · Cited by 15
Self-citationDort, B. A. V., Carland, J. E., Penm, J. H.-D., Ritchie, A., & Baysari, M. T. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac125 · Cited by 15
Eivazzadeh, S., Berglund, J. S., Larsson, T. C., Fiedler, M., & Anderberg, P. (2018) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/11252 · Cited by 15
El-Yafouri, R., Klieb, L., & Sabatier, V. (2022) · Health Research Policy and Systems · doi:10.1186/s12961-022-00851-0 · Cited by 15
Digitalisation Medical Records: Improving Efficiency and Reducing Burnout in Healthcare
Shaharul, N. A., Zamzuri, M. ‘. I. A., Ariffin, A. A., Azman, A. Z. F., & Ali, N. K. M. (2023) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph20043441 · Cited by 15
Informed collaboration in health care: An embedded‐cases study in geriatric telepsychiatry
Hansen, S., Gogan, J. L., Baxter, R. J., & Garfield, M. J. (2018) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12218 · Cited by 17
Alemu, T., Gezie, L. D., Willems, H., Metzger, J., Abere, B., Seyoum, B., Abraham, L., Wendrad, N., Meressa, S., Desta, B., et al. (2024) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076241301946 · Cited by 25
Clinical Dental Faculty Members’ Perceptions of Diagnostic Errors and How to Avoid Them
Nikdel, C., Nikdel, K., Ibarra-Noriega, A., Kalenderian, E., & Walji, M. F. (2018) · Journal of Dental Education · doi:10.21815/jde.018.037 · Cited by 14
Marques, J. P., Vaz-Pereira, S., Costa, J. F., Marta, A. A., Henriques, J., & da Silva, R. M. (2022) · Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases · doi:10.1186/s13023-022-02489-1 · Cited by 14
An Exploration of Nurses' Perceptions of the Usefulness and Easiness of Using EMRs
Alhur, A. (2023) · Journal of Public Health Sciences · doi:10.56741/jphs.v2i01.263 · Cited by 19
Temporal abstractions to enrich Activity-Based Process Mining corpus with clinical time series
Fernández-Llatas, C., Sacchi, L., Benedí, J.-M., Dagliati, A., Traver, V., & Bellazzi, R. (2014) · IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI ...) · doi:10.1109/bhi.2014.6864481 · Cited by 14
Kiepek, W., & Sengstack, P. R. (2019) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0039-3402450 · Cited by 14
Muhaise, H., Kareyo, M., & Muwanga-Zake, P. J. W. F. (2019) · American Scientific Research Journal for Engineering, Technology, and Sciences · Cited by 14
Weeks, D. L., Keeney, B. J., Evans, P. C., Moore, Q. D., & Conrad, D. A. (2014) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-014-3008-5 · Cited by 19
The Use of ICT in the Health Sector in Pacific Island Countries
Cullen, R. J. (2017) · Public administration and information technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-50972-3_11 · Cited by 14
Siracuse, J. J., Benoit, E., Burke, J., Carter, S., & Schwaitzberg, S. D. (2014) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(14)40016-3 · Cited by 14
The Role of Information Systems to Manage Cerebral Palsy.
Ajami, ., & Maghsoudlorad, A. A. (2016) · Iranian journal of child neurology. · doi:10.22037/ijcn.v10i2.8064 · Cited by 14
Blockchain technology adoption in healthcare: an integrated model
Bazel, M. A., Mohammed, F., Ahmad, M. B., Baarimah, A. O., & Maskari, T. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-95253-x · Cited by 27
Vendor selection in the wake of data breaches: A longitudinal study
Wang, Q., Jiang, S., Ngai, E. W. T., & Huo, B. (2024) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1294 · Cited by 13
Implementation of Scribes in an Academic Emergency Department: The Resident Perspective
Ou, E., Mulcare, M. R., Clark, S., & Sharma, R. (2017) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-16-00807.1 · Cited by 13
Lemey, C., Larsen, M. E., DeVylder, J., Courtet, P., Billot, R., Lenca, P., Walter, M., Baca‐García, E., & Berrouiguet, S. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10111 · Cited by 13
Steinhauser, S. (2020) · International Journal of Innovation Management · doi:10.1142/s1363919621500158 · Cited by 15
Ben‐Assuli, O., & Leshno, M. (2015) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458215584203 · Cited by 14
Sim•TwentyFive: an interactive visualization system for data-driven decision support.
Stubbs, B., Kale, D. C., & Das, A. K. (2012) · PubMed Central · Cited by 13
El-Yafouri, R., & Klieb, L. (2014) · IEEE International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom) · doi:10.1109/healthcom.2014.7001894 · Cited by 13
Kargul, G. J., Wright, S. M., Knight, A. M., McNichol, M., & RIGGIO, J. M. (2012) · American Journal of Medical Quality · doi:10.1177/1062860612445307 · Cited by 13
Bruns, E. J., Hook, A. N., Parker, E. M. L., Esposito, I., Sather, A. K., Parigoris, R. M., Lyon, A. R., & Hyde, K. L. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10197 · Cited by 14
Historia clínica electrónica: factores de resistencia para su uso por parte de los médicos
Ghiglia, M. M. C. (2020) · Revista Médica del Uruguay · doi:10.29193/rmu.36.2.6 · Cited by 13
The Role of Perceived Usefulness and Attitude on Electronic Health Record Acceptance
Gajanayake, R., Sahama, T. R., & Iannella, R. (2014) · International Journal of E-Health and Medical Communications · doi:10.4018/ijehmc.2014100107 · Cited by 14
An investigation of external factors for technological acceptance model of nurses in Indonesia
Setyohadi, D. B., & Purnawati, N. W. (2018) · IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering · doi:10.1088/1757-899x/403/1/012064 · Cited by 13
Extracting Clinical Information from Electronic Medical Records
Lamy, M., Pereira, R., Ferreira, J. C., de Vasconcelos, J. B., Melo, F., & Velez, I. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01746-0_13 · Cited by 13
Tell, A., Westenhöfer, J., Harth, V., & Mache, S. (2023) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare11141988 · Cited by 17
Exploring Healthcare Professionals’ Perspectives on Electronic Medical Records: A Qualitative Study
Torkman, R., Ghapanchi, A. H., & Ghanbarzadeh, R. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16030236 · Cited by 12
Do provider attitudes about electronic health records predict future electronic health record use?
Bishop, T. F., Ryan, M. S., McCullough, C., Shih, S. C., Casalino, L. P., & Ryan, A. M. (2014) · Healthcare · doi:10.1016/j.hjdsi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 12
Farzianpour, F., Amirian, S., & Byravan, R. (2015) · Health · doi:10.4236/health.2015.712180 · Cited by 12
Kang'a, S. G., Muthee, V., Liku, N., Too, D., & Puttkammer, N. H. (2016) · PubMed Central · Cited by 13
Availability, Accessibility, Privacy and Safety Issues Facing Electronic Medical Records
Innab, N. (2018) · International Journal of Security Privacy and Trust Management · doi:10.5121/ijsptm.2018.7101 · Cited by 12
Getting the benefit from electronic patient information that crosses organisational boundaries
Waterson, P. E. (2012) · Cited by 12
Current status and future directions of EMR use in psychology clinics
Cellucci, L. W., Cellucci, T. J., Stanton, M. R., Kerrigan, D., & Madrake, M. (2015) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2015.02.005 · Cited by 12
CDKD: a clinical database of kidney diseases
Singh, S. K., Malik, A., Firoz, A., & Jha, V. (2012) · BMC Nephrology · doi:10.1186/1471-2369-13-23 · Cited by 12
Myneni, S., Patel, V. L., Bova, G. S., Wang, J., Ackermann, C., Berlinicke, C. A., Chen, S. H., Lindvall, M., & Zack, D. J. (2015) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2015.11.001 · Cited by 12
The challenges of human factors for implementation of information systems in the healthcare
Aziz, N. F. A., & Mohamadali, N. A. (2015) · Cited by 12
The way from pen and paper to electronic documentation in a German emergency department
Lucas, B., Schladitz, P., Schirrmeister, W., Pliske, G., Walcher, F., Kulla, M., & Brammen, D. (2019) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-019-4400-y · Cited by 12
An electronic notification system for improving patient flow in the emergency department.
Salmasian, H., Landman, A., & Morris, C. A. (2019) · PubMed Central · Cited by 12
Chen, R.-F., & Hsiao, J.-L. (2021) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/32180 · Cited by 11
Diagnostic errors in Dentistry, opinions of egyptian dental teaching staff, a cross-sectional study
El-Wakeel, N., & Ezzeldin, N. (2022) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02565-9 · Cited by 13
Weeger, A., Gewald, H., & Vriesman, L. J. (2011) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 11
Fundamental Issues in Implementing an Ambulatory Care Electronic Health Record
McAlearney, A. S., Hefner, J. L., Sieck, C., Rizer, M. K., & Huerta, T. R. (2015) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2015.01.140078 · Cited by 10
Schwarz, M., Coccetti, A., Draheim, M., & Gordon, G. (2020) · Australian Health Review · doi:10.1071/ah19024 · Cited by 11
The effects of simulation training on learning of health information systems: A scoping review
Nabovati, E., Jeddi, F. R., Ghaffari, F., & Mirhosseini, F. (2022) · Journal of Education and Health Promotion · doi:10.4103/jehp.jehp_17_21 · Cited by 11
Salloum, R. G., Bilello, L. A., Bian, J., Diiulio, J., Paz, L. G., Gurka, M. J., Gutierrez, M., Hurley, R. W., Jones, R. E., Martinez-Wittinghan, F., et al. (2022) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-022-01217-4 · Cited by 14
Robinson, N., Lorenc, A., Falinski, A., & Banarsee, R. (2012) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.007 · Cited by 11
Pedersen, C. G., Gradus, J. L., Johnsen, S. P., & Mainz, J. (2012) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s29419 · Cited by 11
Supporting Primary Care Practices in Building Capacity to Use Health Information Data
Fernald, D. H., Wearner, R., & Dickinson, W. P. (2014) · eGEMs (Generating Evidence & Methods to improve patient outcomes) · doi:10.13063/2327-9214.1094 · Cited by 11
Taylor, D. N. (2017) · Journal of Chiropractic Humanities · doi:10.1016/j.echu.2016.12.001 · Cited by 11
How do paper and electronic records compare for completeness? A three centre study
Wu, C. H. K., Luk, S. M. H., Holder, R. L., Rodrigues, Z., Ahmed, F., & Murdoch, I. (2018) · Eye · doi:10.1038/s41433-018-0065-8 · Cited by 13
Hoogeboom, A. M. G. M., & Michel-Verkerke, M. B. (2013) · Methods of Information in Medicine · doi:10.3414/me12-01-0041 · Cited by 11
Mayo Clinic Registry of Operational Tasks (ROOT)
Helmers, R. A., Doebbeling, B. N., Kaufman, D. R., Grando, A., Poterack, K. A., Furniss, S., Burton, M. M., & Miksch, T. A. (2019) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings Innovations Quality & Outcomes · doi:10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.06.004 · Cited by 11
A Study of the Management of Electronic Medical Records in Fijian HospitalsPreprint
Ravindra, S. S., Chandra, R., & Dhenesh, V. S. (2015) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1507.03659 · Cited by 12
Hailemariam, T., Atnafu, A., Gezie, L. D., Kaasbøll, J., Klein, J., & Tilahun, B. C. (2024) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/47081 · Cited by 14
Alquhaif, A., & Al‐Mamary, Y. H. (2024) · Human Systems Management · doi:10.1177/01672533241297453 · Cited by 10
Complexity Leadership Theory and Innovation: A New Framework for Innovation Leadership
Weberg, D. (2013) · Cited by 10
Effects of electronic medical records on patient safety culture: The perspective of nurses
Özer, Ö., & Şantaş, F. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13174 · Cited by 10
Myburgh, H., Peters, R. P. H., Hurter, T., Grobbelaar, C. J., & Hoddinott, G. (2020) · Southern African Journal of HIV Medicine · doi:10.4102/sajhivmed.v21i1.1025 · Cited by 10
Yuan, B., Li, J., & Wu, P. (2020) · The International Journal of Health Planning and Management · doi:10.1002/hpm.3085 · Cited by 10
Welchen, V., Matte, J., Giacomello, C. P., Molle, F. D., & Camargo, M. E. (2022) · RAUSP Management Journal · doi:10.1108/rausp-02-2021-0023 · Cited by 10
Special requirements for electronic medical records in neurology
McCarthy, L. H., Longhurst, C., & Hahn, J. S. (2015) · Neurology Clinical Practice · doi:10.1212/cpj.0000000000000093 · Cited by 10
Zwaanswijk, M., Ploem, M. C., Wiesman, F., Verheij, R. A., Friele, R. D., & Gevers, J. K. M. (2013) · Research portal (Tilburg University) · Cited by 10
Routine Health Information System (RHIS) interventions to improve health systems management
Leon, N., Brady, L., Kwamie, A., & Daniels, K. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd012012 · Cited by 10
Crepaldi, N. Y., de Lima, I. B., Vicentine, F. B., Rodrigues, L. M. L., Sanches, T. L. M., Ruffino-Netto, A., Alves, D., & Rijo, R. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-0968-8 · Cited by 10
Mirković, J. (2013) · ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) · doi:10.1145/2494091.2497362 · Cited by 10
Orbital learning: a novel, actively orchestrated decentralised learning for healthcare
Chakshu, N. K., & Nithiarasu, P. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-60915-9 · Cited by 11
Saleh, H. A., Lundborg, C. S., & Sharma, M. (2025) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-025-12877-5 · Cited by 10
Trebble, T. M., Cruickshank, L., Hockey, P., Heyworth, N., Powell, T., & Clarke, N. M. P. (2013) · BMJ Quality & Safety · doi:10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001738 · Cited by 9
Venkatraman, S., Sundarraj, R. P., & Seethamraju, R. (2022) · Information and Organization · doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2022.100430 · Cited by 9
Whitacre, B. E., & Williams, R. (2014) · The Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/jrh.12086 · Cited by 9
Achieving Adherence to Evidence-Based Practices
Everson, J., Lee, S.-Y. D., & Adler‐Milstein, J. (2016) · Medical Care Research and Review · doi:10.1177/1077558715625011 · Cited by 11
Montagni, I., Langlois, E., Wittwer, J., & Tzourio, C. (2017) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.6801 · Cited by 9
Sharp, K., Williams, M., Bogacz, A., Denier, S., McAlearney, A. S., & Aldrich, A. M. (2017) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2017-03-cr-0040 · Cited by 9
Bahadori, M., Alimohammadzadeh, K., Abdolkarimi, K., & Ravangard, R. (2017) · Shiraz E-Medical Journal · doi:10.5812/semj.13729 · Cited by 9
Prodinger, B., Rastall, P., Kalra, D., Wooldridge, D., & Carpenter, I. (2018) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1649488 · Cited by 9
Attending Physicians' Perspectives of Resident Academic Half Day
Wagoner, H., & Seltz, L. B. (2019) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2018.1551140 · Cited by 9
Rahal, R. M., Mercer, J. G., Kuziemsky, C. E., & Yaya, S. (2019) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/13318 · Cited by 9
van Poelgeest, R., Schrijvers, A. J. P., Boonstra, A., & Roes, K. C. B. (2021) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/27671 · Cited by 10
Self-citationGoing Paperless? Issues in Converting a Surgical Assessment Tool to an Electronic Version
Dudek, N. L., Papp, S., & Gofton, W. T. (2015) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2015.1044661 · Cited by 9
Clinician Perceptions of Pediatric Growth Chart Use and Electronic Health Records in Kentucky
Vyas, K. S., Perry, B. L., & Soares, N. (2012) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2012-06-ra-0023 · Cited by 9
A Review of eHealth Initiatives: Implications for Improving Health Service Delivery in Nepal
Ashish, K. C., Sunny, A. K., Poudel, R. P., & Basnet, O. (2019) · Journal of Nepal Health Research Council · doi:10.33314/jnhrc.v17i3.1787 · Cited by 9
Antecedents to the user adoption of electronic medical record
Najaftorkaman, M., & Ghapanchi, A. H. (2014) · Griffith Research Online · Cited by 9
Quality of Electronic Medical Records
Gregori, D., & Berchialla, P. (2012) · doi:10.1002/9781119940012.ch23 · Cited by 9
Shuaib, W., Suarez, J. M., Romero, J. D., Pamello, C. D., Alweis, R., Khan, A. A., Shah, S. R., Shahid, H., PierreCharles, S. B., & Sanchez, L. R. (2016) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458215589204 · Cited by 8
Torkman, R., Ghapanchi, A. H., & Ghanbarzadeh, R. (2025) · Informatics · doi:10.3390/informatics12010003 · Cited by 9
Distributed IT championing: A process theory
Negoita, B., Rahrovani, Y., Lapointe, L., & Pinsonneault, A. (2021) · Journal of Information Technology · doi:10.1177/02683962211019406 · Cited by 10
Vargas-Herrera, J., Meneses, G., & Cortez-Escalante, J. J. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/34858 · Cited by 9
Do electronic health record systems “dumb down” clinicians?
Melton, G. B., Cimino, J. J., Lehmann, C. U., Sengstack, P. R., Smith, J., Tierney, W. M., & Miller, R. A. (2022) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocac163 · Cited by 8
Muller, E., Huysmans, M. A., van Rijssen, H. J., & Anema, J. R. (2023) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2023.2224083 · Cited by 9
The Digital Ecosystem and Major Public Health Informatics Initiatives in Resource-Limited Settings
Gashu, K. D. (2024) · Sustainable development goals series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-71118-3_4 · Cited by 11
From benefits idealisation to value optimisation: application in the digital health context
Smith, N., Burton‐Jones, A., & Sullivan, C. M. (2020) · Australian Health Review · doi:10.1071/ah19255 · Cited by 8
Rangel, J. C., & Humphrey-Murto, S. M. (2023) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.15179 · Cited by 12
Nadhrah, N., & Michell, V. A. (2013) · CentAUR (University of Reading) · Cited by 8
Innovations in Twenty-First Century Cardiovascular Medicine
Garry, M. G., Metzger, J. M., Shi, X., & Garry, D. J. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-1475-9_30 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Boonstra, Albert
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2010-08-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 231-231
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2924334
- OpenAlex
- W2155857546
- Cited by
- 851
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, physician acceptance, technology adoption barriers, EMR implementation, change management, organizational barriers, financial barriers, legal barriers, social barriers, psychological barriers, time barriers, technical challenges, implementation strategies, medical practice
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Computers, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Physicians, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
