The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The main objective of this research is to identify, categorize, and analyze barriers perceived by physicians to the adoption of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in order to provide implementers with beneficial intervention options. METHODS: A systematic literature review, based on research papers from 1998 to 2009, concerning barriers to the acceptance of EMRs by physicians was conducted. Four databases, "Science", "EBSCO", "PubMed" and "The Cochrane Library", were used in the literature search. Studies were included in the analysis if they reported on physicians' perceived barriers to implementing and using electronic medical records. Electronic medical records are defined as computerized medical information systems that collect, store and display patient information. RESULTS: The study includes twenty-two articles that have considered barriers to EMR as perceived by physicians. Eight main categories of barriers, including a total of 31 sub-categories, were identified. These eight categories are: A) Financial, B) Technical, C) Time, D) Psychological, E) Social, F) Legal, G) Organizational, and H) Change Process. All these categories are interrelated with each other. In particular, Categories G (Organizational) and H (Change Process) seem to be mediating factors on other barriers. By adopting a change management perspective, we develop some barrier-related interventions that could overcome the identified barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the positive effects of EMR usage in medical practices, the adoption rate of such systems is still low and meets resistance from physicians. This systematic review reveals that physicians may face a range of barriers when they approach EMR implementation. We conclude that the process of EMR implementation should be treated as a change project, and led by implementers or change managers, in medical practices. The quality of change management plays an important role in the success of EMR implementation. The barriers and suggested interventions highlighted in this study are intended to act as a reference for implementers of Electronic Medical Records. A careful diagnosis of the specific situation is required before relevant interventions can be determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The need for recognised standards for the provision of e-health systems was described by many studies [16, 18, 20, 28, 33, 36, 48, 49, 51].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“An absence or inadequacy of legislation and policies and liability concerns may hamper the implementation of e-health systems at the organisational and health professional level [17, 18, 20, 51].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Incentives by government organisations and other external stakeholders may facilitate adoption by healthcare organisations [17, 18, 39, 48, 49].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The fit between e-health systems and workflows in particular was discussed by the majority of studies [15, 16, 18, 21, 23, 25, 27, 28, 36, 40, 41, 43, 47–50, 52, 55–58].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“and a lack of involvement can be a barrier to implementation [18, 53].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The quality of project management during the implementation period [18], careful study of the downstream effects of implementation on workflow [55], additional training [31, 55], the adaptability of technologies to fit with roles, tasks and workflows [37] and dedicated technical support staff [31] are suggested as strategies to reduce barriers related to disruptions to workflow, roles and respons”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Generally, access to appropriate, high-quality, well-funded, and easily available training was reported as a facilitator to implementation, whereas it was reported as a barrier when it was non-existent or existent but inadequate [15, 16, 18, 20, 23, 25, 28, 31, 37, 43, 45, 50, 51, 53–58].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Physician resistance to e-health implementation is reported by several studies to be related to fear of [18], dissatisfaction with [18] and uncertainty over [43, 47] new roles and responsibilities, created by the introduction of e-health systems [18].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The designation of champions [18, 20, 25, 29, 31, 32, 36, 37, 39, 51, 54, 58] may be important for implementation success.”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Specifically, fears over a loss of autonomy [16, 18, 27, 34, 37, 39, 43], concerns about liability [16, 18, 22, 37, 43, 51], concerns over patient privacy and security being compromised [16, 18, 20, 23, 24, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51–53, 56, 57], and perceived threats to patient and health professional relationships [18, 25, 27, 28, 31, 34, 37–39, 41, 43, 54, 57] through the”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The work of planning includes the delineation of roles and responsibilities [43], securing time to invest system selection and procurement [18], evaluating other concomitant policy and process changes [40], needs assessment and analysis, development of a business plan [44], early identification and engagement of champions [31], involving end users [16, 27, 41, 51], establishing a guiding”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Healthcare professionals’ computer skills, abilities and experience were cited by several studies as influencing implementation and acceptance of e-health systems [16, 18, 25, 28, 34, 36, 37, 41, 43, 52, 57].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“However, the current evidence base is dominated by studies from the US and given the major differences in the social, political and economic foundations of their healthcare system, it is important to explore whether these issues are relevant in other contexts.”
From Exploring the implementation of an electronic record into a maternity unit: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Empirical evidence that explores the benefits, barriers and disadvantages of implementing electronic records has recently been summarised in a systematic review [8] of 22 studies, which identified technical issues alongside financial and time constraints as the most frequently reported barriers associated with electronic record implementation.”
From Exploring the implementation of an electronic record into a maternity unit: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The 93 papers addressed a wide range of eHealth applications. 57 targeted the EHR/EMR, which was defined as computerized medical information systems that collect, store, and display patient information [24].”
From Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review (2013) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Journal of Family Practice
Geyman, J. P. (1997) · American Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1080/01926189708251066 · Cited by 3,088
Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., & Nykänen, P. (2008) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001 · Cited by 1,374
Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians
DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Rao, S. R., Donelan, K., Ferris, T. G., Jha, A., Kaushal, R., Levy, D. E., Rosenbaum, S., Shields, A. E., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0802005 · Cited by 1,111
Physicians’ Use Of Electronic Medical Records: Barriers And Solutions
Miller, R. H., & Sim, I. (2004) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116 · Cited by 869
(2002) · Computers in health care · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0069-4 · Cited by 425
Cavicchi, C., & Vagnoni, E. (2006) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.016 · Cited by 361
Physician acceptance of information technologies: Role of perceived threat to professional autonomy
Walter, Z. D., & Lopez, M. S. (2008) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.004 · Cited by 331
Pizziferri, L., Kittler, A. F., Volk, L. A., Honour, M. M., Gupta, S., Wang, S. J., Wang, T., Lippincott, M. F., Li, Q., & Bates, D. W. (2004) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009 · Cited by 283
Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey
Lærum, H., Ellingsen, G., & Faxvaag, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7325.1344 · Cited by 226
Earnest, M. A., Ross, S. E., Wittevrongel, L., Moore, L. A., & Lin, C.-T. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1479 · Cited by 207
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Terry AL, Thorpe CF, Giles GG, Brown JB, Harris SB, Reid GJ, Thind A, Stewart M: Implementing Electronic Health Records. Canadian Family Physician. 2008, 54: 730-736.
- Simon SR, Kalshal R, Cleary PD, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Oray EJ, Burdick E, Poon EG, Batees WW: Physicians and Electronic Health Records "A Statewide Survey. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2007, 167 (5): 507-512. 10.1001/archinte.167.5.507. · DOI
- European Commission: Study on the Legal Framework for Interoperable eHealth in Europe. 2009, Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General Information Society
- McCarthy C, Eastman D: Change Management Strategies for an Effective EMR implementations. HIMSS Chicago. 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 848
Zhu, V. J., Lenert, L. A., Bunnell, B. E., Obeid, J. S., Jefferson, M. S., & Halbert, C. H. (2019) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0795-y · Cited by 58
Systematic AI Support for Decision-Making in the Healthcare Sector: Obstacles and Success Factors
Bertl, M., Ross, P., & Draheim, D. (2023) · Health Policy and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100748 · Cited by 59
Alasmary, M., El‐Metwally, A., & Househ, M. S. (2014) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-014-0069-2 · Cited by 55
Terry, A. L., Brown, J. B., Denomme, L. B., Thind, A., & Stewart, M. (2012) · The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine · doi:10.3122/jabfm.2012.04.110089 · Cited by 55
User experiences with different regional health information exchange systems in Finland
Hyppönen, H., Reponen, J., Lääveri, T., & Viitanen, J. (2013) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.10.002 · Cited by 55
A study of general practitioners’ perspectives on electronic medical records systems in NHSScotland
Bouamrane, M.-M., & Mair, F. S. (2013) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-58 · Cited by 55
Mukred, M., Yusof, Z. M., Mokhtar, U. A., & Manap, N. A. (2016) · International Journal on Advanced Science Engineering and Information Technology · doi:10.18517/ijaseit.6.6.1369 · Cited by 53
WITHDRAWN: Compliance with HIPAA and GDPR in blockchain-based electronic health record
Shuaib, M., Alam, S., Alam, M. S., & Nasir, M. S. (2021) · Materials Today Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2021.03.059 · Cited by 53
RetractedDastagir, M. T., Chin, H. L., McNamara, M., Poteraj, K., Battaglini, S., & Alstot, L. (2012) · PubMed Central · Cited by 52
Skyttberg, N., Vicente, J., Chen, R., Blomqvist, H., & Koch, S. (2016) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0305-4 · Cited by 52
Jormanainen, V. J. (2018) · Finnish Journal of eHealth and eWelfare · doi:10.23996/fjhw.74511 · Cited by 52
Hennemann, S., Witthöft, M., Bethge, M., Spanier, K., Beutel, M. E., & Zwerenz, R. (2018) · International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health · doi:10.1007/s00420-017-1280-5 · Cited by 49
Strategies for Achieving Whole-Practice Engagement and Buy-in to the Patient-Centered Medical Home
Bleser, W. K., Miller-Day, M. A., Naughton, D., Bricker, P. L., Cronholm, P. F., & Gabbay, R. A. (2014) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1564 · Cited by 50
Implementation Differences of Hospital Information System (HIS) in Malaysian Public Hospitals
Ismail, N. I., Abdullah, N. H., Shamsudin, A., & Ariffin, N. A. N. (2013) · International Journal of Social Science and Humanity · doi:10.7763/ijssh.2013.v3.208 · Cited by 56
Lambooij, M., Drewes, H. W.-T., & Koster, F. (2017) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0412-x · Cited by 50
Prioritizing Barriers to Successful Implementation of Hospital Information Systems
Ahmadian, L., Khajouei, R., Salehinejad, S., Ebrahimzadeh, M., & Nikkar, S. E. (2014) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-014-0151-9 · Cited by 47
Struik, M. H. L., Koster, F., Schuit, A. J., Nugteren, R., Veldwijk, J., & Lambooij, M. (2014) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-9-69 · Cited by 47
Longitudinal study of user experiences of a CPOE system in a pediatric hospital
Baysari, M. T., Hardie, R., Lake, R., Richardson, L., McCullagh, C., Gardo, A., & Westbrook, J. I. (2017) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.10.018 · Cited by 49
Ontology-based clinical information extraction from physician’s free-text notes
Yehia, E., Boshnak, H., AbdelGaber, S., Abdo, A., & Elzanfaly, D. S. (2019) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103276 · Cited by 49
Liang, D., Darko, A. P., & Ju, Z. (2019) · Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1080/0952813x.2019.1694589 · Cited by 49
Scantlebury, A., Sheard, L., Watt, I., Cairns, P., Wright, J., & Adamson, J. (2017) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-016-0406-0 · Cited by 41
“Empirical evidence that explores the benefits, barriers and disadvantages of implementing electronic records has recently been summarised in a systematic review [8] of 22 studies, which identified technical issues alongside financial and time constraints as the most frequently reported barriers associated with electro…”
BackgroundIntroducing New Perspectives on Virtual Human Resource Development
Bennett, E. E. (2014) · Advances in Developing Human Resources · doi:10.1177/1523422314532091 · Cited by 48
Predictors of physicians’ stress related to information systems: a nine-year follow-up survey study
Heponiemi, T., Hyppönen, H., Kujala, S., Aalto, A., Vehko, T., Vänskä, J., & Elovainio, M. J. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3094-x · Cited by 48
A framework for analysing learning health systems: Are we removing the most impactful barriers?
McLachlan, S., Dube, K., Johnson, O. A., Buchanan, D., POTTS, H. W. W., Gallagher, T., & Fenton, N. (2019) · Learning Health Systems · doi:10.1002/lrh2.10189 · Cited by 52
Classification and prioritization of usability problems using an augmented classification scheme
Khajouei, R., Peute, L., Hasman, A., & Jaspers, M. (2011) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2011.07.002 · Cited by 48
Ahmadi, H., Nilashi, M., Shahmoradi, L., Ibrahim, O., Sadoughi, F., Alizadeh, M., & Alizadeh, A. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2018.05.021 · Cited by 47
Save Face or Save Life: Physicians’ Dilemma in Using Clinical Decision Support Systems
Liang, H., & Xue, Y. (2021) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2021.1082 · Cited by 50
Landman, A., Lee, C. H., Sasson, C., Gelder, C. M. V., & Curry, L. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0032692 · Cited by 47
Gopalakrishna‐Remani, V., Jones, R. P., & Camp, K. M. (2018) · Information Systems Frontiers · doi:10.1007/s10796-018-9836-9 · Cited by 51
Or, C. K., Tong, E. L. H., Tan, J., & Chan, S. (2018) · Journal of Medical Systems · doi:10.1007/s10916-018-0971-0 · Cited by 45
Enaizan, O., Eneizan, B. M., Almaaitah, M. F., Al-Radaideh, A. T., & Saleh, A. M. (2020) · Informatics in Medicine Unlocked · doi:10.1016/j.imu.2020.100450 · Cited by 57
Data Requirements for Electronic Surveillance of Healthcare-Associated Infections
Woeltje, K. F., Lin, M. Y., Klompas, M., Wright, M. O., Zuccotti, G., & Trick, W. E. (2014) · Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology · doi:10.1086/677623 · Cited by 44
Intelligent diagnosis with Chinese electronic medical records based on convolutional neural networks
Li, X., Wang, H., He, H., Du, J., Chen, J., & Wu, J. (2019) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2617-8 · Cited by 46
Jeddi, F. R., Nabovati, E., Bigham, R., & Khajouei, R. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104026 · Cited by 44
McAlearney, A. S., Hefner, J. L., Sieck, C. J., & Huerta, T. R. (2015) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12227 · Cited by 57
Perry, J. J., Sutherland, J., Symington, C., Dorland, K., Mansour, M., & Stiell, I. G. (2013) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emermed-2013-202479 · Cited by 43
Applying Electronic Medical Records in health care
Abdekhoda, M., Dehnad, A., Noruzi, A., Gohari, M., & Ahmadi, M. (2016) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.4338/aci-2015-11-ra-0165 · Cited by 51
Issues That Face Rural Surgery in the United States
Nakayama, D. K., & Hughes, T. G. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.03.056 · Cited by 43
Clinical prediction rules: a systematic review of healthcare provider opinions and preferences
Kennedy, G., & Gallego, B. (2019) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.12.003 · Cited by 39
Rentrop, V., Damerau, M., Schweda, A., Steinbach, J., Schüren, L. C., Niedergethmann, M., Skoda, E.-M., Teufel, M., & Bäuerle, A. (2022) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/31229 · Cited by 42
EVALUATING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IT PROJECT MANAGEMENT IN HEALTHCARE DIGITALIZATION: A REVIEW
Akindote, O. J., Adegbite, A. O., Omotosho, A., Anyanwu, A., & Maduka, C. P. (2024) · International Medical Science Research Journal · doi:10.51594/imsrj.v4i1.698 · Cited by 42
Empowering patients through eHealth: a case report of a pan-European project
Lettieri, E., Fumagalli, L. P., Radaelli, G., Bertele, P., Vogt, J., Hammerschmidt, R., Lara, J. L., Carriazo, A., & Masella, C. (2015) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0983-0 · Cited by 42
Yuan, C. T., Bradley, E. H., & Nembhard, I. M. (2015) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0154-6 · Cited by 54
Health reform: Is routinely collected electronic information fit for purpose?
Liaw, S., Chen, H.-Y., Maneze, D., Taggart, J., Dennis, S. M., Vagholkar, S., & Bunker, J. (2011) · Emergency Medicine Australasia · doi:10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01486.x · Cited by 42
The Pivotal Role of Change Appropriation in the Implementation of Health Care Technology
Barrett, A. K., & Stephens, K. K. (2016) · Management Communication Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0893318916682872 · Cited by 42
Janssen, A. L., Donnelly, C., Elder, E. E., Pathmanathan, N., & Shaw, T. J. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-06015-6 · Cited by 42
Cresswell, K. M., Bates, D. W., & Sheikh, A. (2013) · Apple Academic Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/b16306-4 · Cited by 42
Measuring Electronic Health Record Use in Primary Care: A Scoping Review
Huang, M., Gibson, C. J., & Terry, A. L. (2018) · Applied Clinical Informatics · doi:10.1055/s-0037-1615807 · Cited by 42
Digital health understanding and preparedness of medical students: a cross-sectional study
Baumgartner, M., Sauer, C., Blagec, K., & Dorffner, G. (2022) · Medical Education Online · doi:10.1080/10872981.2022.2114851 · Cited by 39
“It shows a common reluctance towards the possibilities of digitalisation within communication [31].”
BackgroundSustaining "Meaningful Use" of Health Information Technology in Low-Resource Practices
Green, L. A., Potworowski, G. A., Day, A., May-Gentile, R., Vibbert, D., Maki, B., & Kiesel, L. (2015) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1740 · Cited by 40
Mukred, M., Yusof, Z. M., Mokhtar, U. A., & Fauzi, F. (2018) · Journal of Information Science · doi:10.1177/0165551518783133 · Cited by 51
Mukred, M., Yusof, Z. M., Mokhtar, U. A., Sadiq, A., Hawash, B., & Ahmed, W. (2021) · KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems · doi:10.3837/tiis.2021.01.006 · Cited by 44
Alsyouf, A., Ishak, A. K., Lutfi, A., Alhazmi, F. N., & Al‐Okaily, M. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph191711125 · Cited by 52
Ease of adoption of clinical natural language processing software: An evaluation of five systems
Zheng, K., Vydiswaran, V. G. V., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Stubbs, A., Uzuner, Ö., Gururaj, A. E., Bayer, S., Aberdeen, J. S., Rumshisky, A., et al. (2015) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2015.07.008 · Cited by 40
Implementation of electronic medical records: theory-informed qualitative study.
Greiver, M., Barnsley, J., Glazier, R. H., Moineddin, R., & Harvey, B. J. (2011) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 39
Berihun, B., Atnafu, D. D., & Sitotaw, G. (2020) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2020/3827328 · Cited by 39
Challenges for developing health-care knowledge in the digital age
Alrahbi, D., Khan, M., Gupta, S., Modgil, S., & Jabbour, C. J. C. (2020) · Journal of Knowledge Management · doi:10.1108/jkm-03-2020-0224 · Cited by 43
Lee, C.-C., Lin, S.-P., Yang, S., Tsou, M., & Chang, K.-Y. (2013) · Acta anaesthesiologica Taiwanica · doi:10.1016/j.aat.2013.03.013 · Cited by 39
Meslin, E. M., Alpert, S. A., Carroll, A. E., Odell, J. D., Tierney, W. M., & Schwartz, P. H. (2013) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.08.010 · Cited by 38
Polasek, T. M., Rayner, C. R., Peck, R., Rowland, A., Kimko, H. H. C., & Rostami‐Hodjegan, A. (2018) · Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development · doi:10.1002/cpdd.638 · Cited by 37
El.Mahalli, A. A. (2015) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 37
Dentists’ opinions on using digital technologies in dental practice
van der Zande, M. M., Gorter, R. C., Bruers, J. J. M., Aartman, I. H. A., & Wismeijer, D. (2017) · Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology · doi:10.1111/cdoe.12345 · Cited by 37
A CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK FOR SUSTAINABLE eHEALTH IMPLEMENTATION IN RESOURCE-CONSTRAINED SETTINGS
Fanta, G. B., & Pretorius, L. (2018) · The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering · doi:10.7166/29-3-2055 · Cited by 43
Mukred, M., Yusof, Z. M., & Alotaibi, F. M. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2927614 · Cited by 33
Global health systems' data science approach for precision diagnosis of sepsis in early life
Iregbu, K. C., Dramowski, A., Milton, R., Nsutebu, E. F., Howie, S. R. C., Chakraborty, M., Lavoie, P. M., Costelloe, C. E., & Ghazal, P. (2021) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00645-9 · Cited by 37
Implementation of Electronic Medical Records in Mental Health Settings: Scoping Review
Zurynski, Y. A., Ellis, L. A., Tong, H. L., Laranjo, L., Clay‐Williams, R., Testa, L., Meulenbroeks, I., Turton, C., & Sara, G. E. (2021) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/30564 · Cited by 42
Thusini, S., Milenova, M., Nahabedian, N., Grey, B., Soukup, T., Chua, K., & Henderson, C. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-08832-3 · Cited by 36
Electronic health records: Use and barriers among physicians in eastern province of Saudi Arabia
Mahalli, A. E. (2015) · Saudi Journal for Health Sciences · doi:10.4103/2278-0521.151407 · Cited by 36
Yehualashet, G., Asemahagn, M. A., & Tilahun, B. C. (2015) · doi:10.12856/jhia-2015-v3-i1-124 · Cited by 35
Djalali, S., Ursprung, N., Rosemann, T. J., Senn, O., & Tandjung, R. (2015) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.08.001 · Cited by 33
Weeger, A., & Gewald, H. (2014) · Health Systems · doi:10.1057/hs.2014.11 · Cited by 34
Beyond the Focus Group: Understanding Physicians’ Barriers to Electronic Medical Records
Yan, H., Gardner, R. L., & Baier, R. R. (2012) · The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety · doi:10.1016/s1553-7250(12)38024-0 · Cited by 34
Rawajfah, O. A., & Tubaishat, A. (2017) · Informatics for Health and Social Care · doi:10.1080/17538157.2017.1353998 · Cited by 34
Kuusio, H., Heponiemi, T., Aalto, A., Sinervo, T. S., & Elovainio, M. J. (2011) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/j.1475-6773.2011.01313.x · Cited by 36
Hernández‐Ávila, J. E., Palacio-Mejía, L. S., Lara‐Esqueda, A., Silvestre, E. A., Agudelo‐Botero, M., Diana, M. L., Hotchkiss, D. R., Plaza, B., & Parbul, A. S. (2012) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-000907 · Cited by 37
A Hybrid MCDM Model for Improving the Electronic Health Record to Better Serve Client Needs
Liou, J. J. H., Lu, M., Hu, S.-K., Cheng, C.-H., & Chuang, Y. (2017) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su9101819 · Cited by 36
Bernburg, M., Tell, A., Groneberg, D. A., & Mache, S. (2024) · BMC Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12873-024-00950-x · Cited by 51
Park, S. Y., Pine, K., & Chen, Y. (2013) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2441776.2441786 · Cited by 32
McMurray, J., Hicks, E. M., Johnson, H., Elliott, J. B., Byrne, K. M., & Stolee, P. (2013) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458212467547 · Cited by 32
Sudirahayu, I., & Harjoko, A. (2017) · Journal of Information Systems for Public Health · doi:10.22146/jisph.6536 · Cited by 32
Development of a techno-humanist model for e-health adoption of innovative technology
Razmak, J., Bélanger, C. H., & Farhan, W. (2018) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.022 · Cited by 32
Internet of Things in Emergency Medical Care and Services
Edoh, T. O. (2019) · IntechOpen eBooks · doi:10.5772/intechopen.76974 · Cited by 32
A Time-Driven Activity-Based Costing Analysis of Emergency Department Scribes
Heaton, H. A., Nestler, D. M., Barry, W. J., Helmers, R. A., Sır, M. Y., Goyal, D. G., Haas, D. A., Kaplan, R. S., & Sadosty, A. T. (2019) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings Innovations Quality & Outcomes · doi:10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.11.004 · Cited by 32
Muigg, D., Kästner, P., Duftschmid, G., Modre‐Osprian, R., & Haluza, D. (2019) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-019-0746-7 · Cited by 32
Alohali, M., Carton, F., & O’Connor, Y. (2020) · Journal of Decision System · doi:10.1080/12460125.2020.1728988 · Cited by 34
Data Quality and Completeness in a Web Stroke Registry as the Basis for Data and Process Mining
Lanzola, G., Parimbelli, E., Micieli, G., Cavallini, A. M., & Quaglini, S. (2014) · Journal of Healthcare Engineering · doi:10.1260/2040-2295.5.2.163 · Cited by 31
The cultural complexity of medical groups
Nembhard, I. M., Singer, S. J., Shortell, S. M., Rittenhouse, D. R., & Casalino, L. P. (2012) · Health Care Management Review · doi:10.1097/hmr.0b013e31822f54cd · Cited by 32
Sedlmayr, B., Patapovas, A., Kirchner, M., Sonst, A., Müller, F., Pfistermeister, B., Plank‐Kiegele, B., Vogler, R., Criegee‐Rieck, M., Prokosch, H., et al. (2013) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/1472-6947-13-79 · Cited by 31
Defining Health Information Exchange: Scoping Review of Published Definitions
Akhlaq, A., Sheikh, A., & Pagliari, C. (2017) · Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics · doi:10.14236/jhi.v23i4.838 · Cited by 32
Chandra, S., Agarwal, D., Hanson, A. C., Farmer, J. C., Pickering, B. W., Gajic, O., & Herasevich, V. (2011) · Journal of Critical Care · doi:10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.05.003 · Cited by 31
Joukes, E., Ronald Cornet, A., de Bruijne, M. C., & de Keizer, N. F. (2015) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.014 · Cited by 31
Salazar, B. A., Campos, M. R., & Luiza, V. L. (2017) · Ciência & Saúde Coletiva · doi:10.1590/1413-81232017223.33442016 · Cited by 30
Path To Gain Functional Transparency In Artificial Intelligence With Meaningful Explainability
Hosain, M. T., ANİK, M. H., RAFİ, S., TABASSUM, R., Insia, K., & SIDDIKY, M. M. (2023) · Journal of Metaverse · doi:10.57019/jmv.1306685 · Cited by 40
Technical and Human Challenges of Implementing Hospital Information Systems in Saudi Arabia
Khalifa, M. (2014) · Journal of health informatics in developing countries · Cited by 30
The Barriers of the Assistive Robotics Market—What Inhibits Health Innovation?
Noury, G. A., Walmsley, A., Jones, R. B., & Gaudl, S. E. (2021) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s21093111 · Cited by 30
Cresswell, K. M., Worth, A., & Sheikh, A. (2012) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458212445399 · Cited by 32
Nambisan, P., Kreps, G. L., & Polit, S. (2013) · Interactive Journal of Medical Research · doi:10.2196/ijmr.2437 · Cited by 30
Restructuring Human Infrastructure
Tang, C., Chen, Y., Semaan, B., & Roberson, J. A. (2015) · ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1145/2675133.2675277 · Cited by 29
Hamade, N., Terry, A. L., & Malvankar‐Mehta, M. S. (2019) · BMJ Health & Care Informatics · doi:10.1136/bmjhci-2019-000023 · Cited by 29
Ngugi, P., Were, M. C., & Babić, A. (2021) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-021-01737-x · Cited by 45
Metadata
- Authors
- Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Boonstra, Albert
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2010-08-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 231-231
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2924334
- OpenAlex
- W2155857546
- Cited by
- 851
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, physician acceptance, technology adoption barriers, EMR implementation, change management, organizational barriers, financial barriers, legal barriers, social barriers, psychological barriers, time barriers, technical challenges, implementation strategies, medical practice
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Computers, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Physicians, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
