The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Barriers to the acceptance of electronic medical records by physicians from systematic review to taxonomy and interventions
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: The main objective of this research is to identify, categorize, and analyze barriers perceived by physicians to the adoption of Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) in order to provide implementers with beneficial intervention options. METHODS: A systematic literature review, based on research papers from 1998 to 2009, concerning barriers to the acceptance of EMRs by physicians was conducted. Four databases, "Science", "EBSCO", "PubMed" and "The Cochrane Library", were used in the literature search. Studies were included in the analysis if they reported on physicians' perceived barriers to implementing and using electronic medical records. Electronic medical records are defined as computerized medical information systems that collect, store and display patient information. RESULTS: The study includes twenty-two articles that have considered barriers to EMR as perceived by physicians. Eight main categories of barriers, including a total of 31 sub-categories, were identified. These eight categories are: A) Financial, B) Technical, C) Time, D) Psychological, E) Social, F) Legal, G) Organizational, and H) Change Process. All these categories are interrelated with each other. In particular, Categories G (Organizational) and H (Change Process) seem to be mediating factors on other barriers. By adopting a change management perspective, we develop some barrier-related interventions that could overcome the identified barriers. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the positive effects of EMR usage in medical practices, the adoption rate of such systems is still low and meets resistance from physicians. This systematic review reveals that physicians may face a range of barriers when they approach EMR implementation. We conclude that the process of EMR implementation should be treated as a change project, and led by implementers or change managers, in medical practices. The quality of change management plays an important role in the success of EMR implementation. The barriers and suggested interventions highlighted in this study are intended to act as a reference for implementers of Electronic Medical Records. A careful diagnosis of the specific situation is required before relevant interventions can be determined.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The need for recognised standards for the provision of e-health systems was described by many studies [16, 18, 20, 28, 33, 36, 48, 49, 51].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“An absence or inadequacy of legislation and policies and liability concerns may hamper the implementation of e-health systems at the organisational and health professional level [17, 18, 20, 51].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Incentives by government organisations and other external stakeholders may facilitate adoption by healthcare organisations [17, 18, 39, 48, 49].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The fit between e-health systems and workflows in particular was discussed by the majority of studies [15, 16, 18, 21, 23, 25, 27, 28, 36, 40, 41, 43, 47–50, 52, 55–58].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“and a lack of involvement can be a barrier to implementation [18, 53].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The quality of project management during the implementation period [18], careful study of the downstream effects of implementation on workflow [55], additional training [31, 55], the adaptability of technologies to fit with roles, tasks and workflows [37] and dedicated technical support staff [31] are suggested as strategies to reduce barriers related to disruptions to workflow, roles and respons”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Generally, access to appropriate, high-quality, well-funded, and easily available training was reported as a facilitator to implementation, whereas it was reported as a barrier when it was non-existent or existent but inadequate [15, 16, 18, 20, 23, 25, 28, 31, 37, 43, 45, 50, 51, 53–58].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Physician resistance to e-health implementation is reported by several studies to be related to fear of [18], dissatisfaction with [18] and uncertainty over [43, 47] new roles and responsibilities, created by the introduction of e-health systems [18].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The designation of champions [18, 20, 25, 29, 31, 32, 36, 37, 39, 51, 54, 58] may be important for implementation success.”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Specifically, fears over a loss of autonomy [16, 18, 27, 34, 37, 39, 43], concerns about liability [16, 18, 22, 37, 43, 51], concerns over patient privacy and security being compromised [16, 18, 20, 23, 24, 27, 28, 30, 31, 33, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51–53, 56, 57], and perceived threats to patient and health professional relationships [18, 25, 27, 28, 31, 34, 37–39, 41, 43, 54, 57] through the”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“The work of planning includes the delineation of roles and responsibilities [43], securing time to invest system selection and procurement [18], evaluating other concomitant policy and process changes [40], needs assessment and analysis, development of a business plan [44], early identification and engagement of champions [31], involving end users [16, 27, 41, 51], establishing a guiding”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“Healthcare professionals’ computer skills, abilities and experience were cited by several studies as influencing implementation and acceptance of e-health systems [16, 18, 25, 28, 34, 36, 37, 41, 43, 52, 57].”
From Factors that influence the implementation of e-health: a systematic review of systematic reviews (an update) (2016) · cites this paper as [18]
In the citing paper
“However, the current evidence base is dominated by studies from the US and given the major differences in the social, political and economic foundations of their healthcare system, it is important to explore whether these issues are relevant in other contexts.”
From Exploring the implementation of an electronic record into a maternity unit: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“Empirical evidence that explores the benefits, barriers and disadvantages of implementing electronic records has recently been summarised in a systematic review [8] of 22 studies, which identified technical issues alongside financial and time constraints as the most frequently reported barriers associated with electronic record implementation.”
From Exploring the implementation of an electronic record into a maternity unit: a qualitative study using Normalisation Process Theory (2017) · cites this paper as [8]
In the citing paper
“The 93 papers addressed a wide range of eHealth applications. 57 targeted the EHR/EMR, which was defined as computerized medical information systems that collect, store, and display patient information [24].”
From Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review (2013) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Journal of Family Practice
Geyman, J. P. (1997) · American Journal of Family Therapy · doi:10.1080/01926189708251066 · Cited by 3,088
Häyrinen, K., Saranto, K., & Nykänen, P. (2008) · International Journal of Medical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2007.09.001 · Cited by 1,374
Electronic health records in ambulatory care—a national survey of physicians
DesRoches, C. M., Campbell, E. G., Rao, S. R., Donelan, K., Ferris, T. G., Jha, A., Kaushal, R., Levy, D. E., Rosenbaum, S., Shields, A. E., et al. (2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmsa0802005 · Cited by 1,111
Physicians’ Use Of Electronic Medical Records: Barriers And Solutions
Miller, R. H., & Sim, I. (2004) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.23.2.116 · Cited by 869
(2002) · Computers in health care · doi:10.1007/978-1-4613-0069-4 · Cited by 425
Cavicchi, C., & Vagnoni, E. (2006) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2006.09.016 · Cited by 361
Physician acceptance of information technologies: Role of perceived threat to professional autonomy
Walter, Z. D., & Lopez, M. S. (2008) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2008.06.004 · Cited by 331
Pizziferri, L., Kittler, A. F., Volk, L. A., Honour, M. M., Gupta, S., Wang, S. J., Wang, T., Lippincott, M. F., Li, Q., & Bates, D. W. (2004) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2004.11.009 · Cited by 283
Doctors' use of electronic medical records systems in hospitals: cross sectional survey
Lærum, H., Ellingsen, G., & Faxvaag, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7325.1344 · Cited by 226
Earnest, M. A., Ross, S. E., Wittevrongel, L., Moore, L. A., & Lin, C.-T. (2004) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1479 · Cited by 207
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Terry AL, Thorpe CF, Giles GG, Brown JB, Harris SB, Reid GJ, Thind A, Stewart M: Implementing Electronic Health Records. Canadian Family Physician. 2008, 54: 730-736.
- Simon SR, Kalshal R, Cleary PD, Jenter CA, Volk LA, Oray EJ, Burdick E, Poon EG, Batees WW: Physicians and Electronic Health Records "A Statewide Survey. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2007, 167 (5): 507-512. 10.1001/archinte.167.5.507. · DOI
- European Commission: Study on the Legal Framework for Interoperable eHealth in Europe. 2009, Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General Information Society
- McCarthy C, Eastman D: Change Management Strategies for an Effective EMR implementations. HIMSS Chicago. 2010
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 601–700 of 848
Alharthi, H. (2019) · Saudi Journal for Health Sciences · doi:10.4103/sjhs.sjhs_14_19 · Cited by 2
Role-Based Access Control for Mobile Computing and Applications
Sánchez, Y. K. R., Demurjian, S. A., Conover, J. C., Agresta, T. P., Shao, X., & Diamond, M. (2019) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-0417-8.ch013 · Cited by 2
Physicians’ Perceptions and Attitudes toward Use of Electronic Medical Record Systems in Riyadh
AlOtaib, Y. H., & AlSaedi, M. (2022) · World Family Medicine Journal/Middle East Journal of Family Medicine · doi:10.5742/mewfm.2022.95218 · Cited by 4
Ranusch, A., Lin, Y.-J., Dorsch, M. P., Allen, A. L., Spoutz, P. M., Seagull, F. J., Sussman, J. B., & Barnes, G. D. (2023) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/49025 · Cited by 2
Kaiser, M., & Fränken, J. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-25461-2_7 · Cited by 2
In this issue - Making sense of taxonomies in health informatics
de Lusignan, S. (2014) · Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics · doi:10.14236/jhi.v21i3.82 · Cited by 2
Hielkema, M. (2015) · Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) · Cited by 2
Ismail, N. I. (2016) · UTHM Institutional Repository (Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia) · Cited by 2
Facilitators and Barriers to User Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems
Najaftorkaman, M. (2016) · Griffith Research Online · doi:10.25904/1912/3825 · Cited by 2
Health Information Standardisation as a basis for Learning Health SystemsPreprint
McLachlan, S. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.04811 · Cited by 4
Exploring Facilitators to the Implementation of Electronic Health Records in Saudi ArabiaPreprint
Alzghaibi, H., & Hutchings, H. A. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1338199/v1 · Cited by 2
Acceptance and Usage of Electronic Health Record Systems in Small Medical Practices.
Tannan, R. (2012) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 2
Muhammad, I., & Wickramasinghe, N. S. (2018) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2018.360 · Cited by 2
Fomundam, H., Tesfay, A., Mushipe, S. A., Nyambi, H. T., & Wutoh, A. K. (2021) · World Journal of AIDS · doi:10.4236/wja.2021.112006 · Cited by 1
Telemedicine and Electronic Health
Kasemsap, K. (2017) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-3168-5.ch001 · Cited by 1
khmour, H. Y., Al-Rabeei, Y., Deen, N. Z., Elnour, S., Al-Karbi, K., Rashed, M. H., Al-Muhannadi, M., Elmahdi, M., Shamari, H. A., abugesiesa, M. A., et al. (2022) · World Family Medicine Journal/Middle East Journal of Family Medicine · doi:10.5742/mewfm.2022.95233 · Cited by 1
Development of an electronic medical records project for Al-Razi hospital in Palestine
Neirat, D., Batran, A., & Ayed, A. (2023) · Journal of Public Health Research · doi:10.1177/22799036231217795 · Cited by 1
Economic Viability of Smart Pest Management Practices
Rathnayake, I., Abeysekara, I., & Karalliyadda, C. (2024) · Advances in environmental engineering and green technologies book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-3061-6.ch004 · Cited by 1
de Oliveira, K. R. D. (2025) · REVISTA CIENTÍFICA ACERTTE · doi:10.63026/acertte.v5i7.254 · Cited by 1
Elferink, N., Roest, M. J., Weggelaar‐Jansen, A. M., & de Mul, M. (2025) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/69349 · Cited by 1
Optimizing Engineering Change Management Through ECR Data Analysis and Mining Techniques
Xinyu, Z., & Xin, H. (2025) · Journal of Enterprise and Business Intelligence · doi:10.53759/5181/jebi202505022 · Cited by 1
Ombech, E. A., Gatakaa, H. W., Oloo, E., Oduol, M., Ang'ela, P. B., Etee, P., Nasike, G., Khamala, W., Ameyo, B., Lokaala, S., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1584733 · Cited by 1
Füreder, N., Petzold, T., Schuth, S., Steinhauser, S., & Förster, C. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-48573-3_3 · Cited by 1
Fundamentals applications of blockchain impact on intelligent healthcare systems
Houssein, E. H., Reda, M., Wazery, Y. M., & Younan, M. (2026) · Discover Internet of Things · doi:10.1007/s43926-025-00252-z · Cited by 2
Yang, X., Dijst, M., Daams, J. G., Suhrcke, M., Yang, H., & Ronald Cornet, A. (2026) · JMIR Medical Informatics · doi:10.2196/77296 · Cited by 1
Jameela, N. R., Panakaje, N., Lasrado, B. S., & Parvin, S. M. R. (2026) · Journal of Health Organization and Management · doi:10.1108/jhom-07-2025-0422 · Cited by 1
Health Care Engineering, Part II: Research and Development in the Health Care Environment
Frize, M. (2013) · Synthesis lectures on biomedical engineering · doi:10.2200/s00540ed1v01y201310bme051 · Cited by 1
Hart, C., & Hawrylak, P. J. (2012) · International Journal of Computational Models and Algorithms in Medicine · doi:10.4018/jcmam.2012070102 · Cited by 1
The role of information system in multiple sclerosis management.
Ajami, ., Ahmadi, G., & Etemadifar, M. (2014) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 1
Changes in Trauma Service Professional Fee Coding Following Electronic Health Record Implementation
Salcedo, E. S. (2014) · Journal of Trauma & Treatment · doi:10.4172/2167-1222.1000215 · Cited by 1
Ito, Y. (2012) · Journal of Information Processing and Management · doi:10.1241/johokanri.55.647 · Cited by 1
Barriers to implement electronic health records
Carlos, M., & Sussy, B. (2016) · Iberian Conference on Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI) · doi:10.1109/cisti.2016.7521518 · Cited by 1
Role-Based Access Control for Mobile Computing and Applications
Sánchez, Y. K. R., Demurjian, S. A., Conover, J. C., Agresta, T. P., Shao, X., & Diamond, M. (2016) · Advances in multimedia and interactive technologies book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-0945-5.ch006 · Cited by 1
An online infertility clinical decision support system
de Souza, F. (2017) · Asian Pacific Journal of Reproduction · doi:10.4103/2305-0500.215933 · Cited by 1
WHY DO THEY RESIST? EXAMINING THE SALIENT FACTORS OF PHYSICIANS’ IT ADOPTION BEHAVIOUR
Neff, A., Gewald, H., & Haase, U. (2014) · Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems · Cited by 1
Borbolla, D. A., Becerra-Posada, F., & Novillo-Ortiz, Y. D. (2018) · Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública · doi:10.26633/rpsp.2019.25 · Cited by 1
Billing and Review Perspectives in Healthcare
Fredrickson, J. (2019) · Advances in healthcare information systems and administration book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-2310-0.ch002 · Cited by 1
IT in health care : a business enabler?
Krey, M. (2016) · Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) · doi:10.21256/zhaw-3258 · Cited by 1
Nadhrah, N., & Michell, V. A. (2014) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-6339-8.ch016 · Cited by 1
Alzunidi, M. A., Alowayyid, J. A., Benhadi, R. A., Farouk, H. H., Alshammari, M. H., Sultan, A. S., Almojil, R. A., Alshathri, A. A., Alsalman, N. N., Alshaya, S. S., et al. (2022) · World Family Medicine Journal/Middle East Journal of Family Medicine · doi:10.5742/mewfm.2022.95223 · Cited by 3
Zahrani, L. M., Abdulhaq, M. I., Shams, T. M., & Farahat, F. M. (2022) · World Family Medicine Journal/Middle East Journal of Family Medicine · doi:10.5742/mewfm.2022.95206 · Cited by 1
Maintaining a Standardized Electronic Registry of Spinal Cord Injury in the Public Sector
Gopal, V. V. (2022) · Advances in healthcare information systems and administration book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-6684-5499-2.ch012 · Cited by 1
Bida, M., Kgomo, M. K., Gaudji, B., Demetriou, D., & Dlamini, Z. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-21506-3_14 · Cited by 1
Kuffour, E. A. (2023) · Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies · doi:10.9734/ajess/2023/v43i3945 · Cited by 1
Marutha, N. S. (2023) · Mousaion South African Journal of Information Studies · doi:10.25159/2663-659x/9961 · Cited by 1
Federated learning in healthcare: A systematic review of evolution from traditional paper records
Garg, R., Varia, M., Gorimar, U., Siganporia, A., & Gupta, N. (2024) · AIP conference proceedings · doi:10.1063/5.0228108 · Cited by 1
Mamae, A. A., & Mamo, E. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0329896 · Cited by 1
Heath, M. L. (2015) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems · Cited by 1
Alanazi, A. (2015) · D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) · Cited by 1
Zardini, A., Rossignoli, C., Suppa, A., Ricciardi, F., & Benetollo, P. P. (2014) · International Journal of Healthcare Technology and Management · doi:10.1504/ijhtm.2014.067130 · Cited by 1
The outcomes and influencing factors of telecare managing patients with type 2 diabetes
Cheng, Y.-R. (2015) · Chinese Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/j.cnre.2015.09.002 · Cited by 1
Faizi, S. M., & Medi, I. (2015) · International Conference on Information Security · Cited by 1
Effects of Health Information Technology on Malpractice Insurance Premiums
Kim, H. Y., & Lee, J. (2015) · Healthcare Informatics Research · doi:10.4258/hir.2015.21.2.118 · Cited by 1
Electronic medical record in cardiology: a 10-year Italian experience
Carpeggiani, C., Macerata, A., & Morales, M. A. (2015) · Revista da Associação Médica Brasileira · doi:10.1590/1806-9282.61.04.317 · Cited by 1
Resources for disease state management- what do health professionals want?
Stehlik, P., Darzins, P. J., & Marriott, J. (2014) · Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) · Cited by 1
Review of Factors Impacting Decisions Regarding Electronic Records
Hogaboam, L., & Daim, T. U. (2016) · Innovation, technology and knowledge management · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-17975-9_6 · Cited by 1
The Role of Perceived Usefulness and Attitude on Electronic Health Record Acceptance
Gajanayake, R., Sahama, T. R., & Iannella, R. (2015) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-8756-1.ch003 · Cited by 1
Parthasarathy, R. (2017) · Digital Commons-DePaul (DePaul University) · Cited by 1
Muhammad, I., & Wickramasinghe, N. S. (2018) · Healthcare delivery in the information age · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72287-0_13 · Cited by 2
Using SWOT to Perform a Comparative Analysis of the German and Australian e-Health Systems
Eigner, I., Hamper, A., Wickramasinghe, N. S., & Bodendorf, F. (2018) · Healthcare delivery in the information age · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-72287-0_8 · Cited by 1
Physicians' Estimates of Electronic Prescribing's Impact on Patient Safety and Quality of Care
Kivekäs, E., Mikkonen, S. J., Borycki, E. M., Ihantola, S., & Saranto, K. (2018) · ACI Open · doi:10.1055/s-0038-1660464 · Cited by 2
Medical Scribes: The Future for Medical Data Input in Emergency Departments
Paul, D. P. (2018) · Hospital Topics · doi:10.1080/00185868.2018.1488548 · Cited by 1
Hoque, R., Albar, A., & Alam, M. J. (2018) · Advances in healthcare information systems and administration book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-5460-8.ch020 · Cited by 2
Leander, D., Gifford, A. H., Mecchella, J. N., Sabadosa, K. A., Citters, A. D. V., Snide, J. A., & Nelson, E. C. (2019) · ACI Open · doi:10.1055/s-0039-1688804 · Cited by 1
Jamaluddin, A., & Abawajy, J. (2021) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-80216-5_21 · Cited by 1
Modelling Factors Affecting Patient-Doctor-Computer Communication in Primary Care
Assis-Hassid, S., Heart, T., Reychav, I., & Pliskin, J. S. (2018) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-6198-9.ch010 · Cited by 1
Inhibitors of Physicians' Use of Mandatory Hospital Information Systems (HIS)
Gewald, H., & Gewald, C. (2019) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-1204-3.ch086 · Cited by 1
Telemedicine Adoption Opportunities and Challenges in the Developing World
Zobair, K. M., Sanzogni, L., Sandhu, K., & Islam, M. J. (2021) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-7998-8052-3.ch003 · Cited by 1
Hnish, M. A. J., Deen, N. Z., Snoussi, S., Mohamad, H., Abdalla, M., & Abdelbagi, I. (2022) · World Family Medicine Journal/Middle East Journal of Family Medicine · doi:10.5742/mewfm.2022.95234 · Cited by 1
Hospital Information System for Decision Making: A Qualitative Study
Mohamed, M. S. (2021) · Jurnal Admmirasi · doi:10.47638/admmirasi.v6i1.90 · Cited by 1
Importance of Medical Informatics in Medical Students' Curricula in Saudi Arabia
Amulhem, J. (2015) · UWM Digital Commons (University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee) · Cited by 1
Electronic care records — Can they fulfil their promise?
Wainwright, C. E., & Tullis, E. D. (2014) · Journal of Cystic Fibrosis · doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2014.04.009 · Cited by 1
Requirements for Integrating End-to-End Security into Large-Scale EHR SystemsPreprint
Gawlik, A., Köster, L., Mahmoodi, H., & Winandy, M. (2014) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2457987 · Cited by 1
Clarke, A. (2015) · White Rose eTheses Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) · Cited by 1
Implementation of Electronic Medical Records and Preventive Services: A Mixed Methods Study
Greiver, M. (2011) · TSpace (University of Toronto) · Cited by 1
E-Health and Organizational Change in a Hospital Setting
Monachino, M. S., Moreira, P., & Janela, F. (2016) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-4666-9978-6.ch005 · Cited by 1
Ayele, D. G. (2013) · Cited by 1
Koeken, M. M. (2012) · TU/e Research Portal · Cited by 1
Assessing Value Added in the Use of Electronic Medical Records in Nigeria
Abimbola, I. G. (2015) · ScholarWorks (Walden University) · Cited by 1
Ross, J. (2016) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 1
Influences On The Effectiveness Of Information Technology Innovations In Primary Health Care
Watterson, J. (2018) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 1
Influence of Digitization of Medical Records in Private Hospitals in Nairobi and Nakuru Counties
Gathungu, M. (2018) · Cited by 1
Zobair, K. M. (2019) · Griffith Research Online · doi:10.25904/1912/1330 · Cited by 1
INVESTIGATING THE NON-ADOPTION OF ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS IN PRIMARY CARE
Ramdoss, S. (2014) · TigerPrints (Clemson University) · Cited by 1
Yehualashet, D. E., Tariku, B., Desalegn, A., & Seid, E. (2021) · doi:10.2196/preprints.29568 · Cited by 1
Ahmed, M. H. (2019) · doi:10.2196/preprints.17287 · Cited by 1
Kopanz, J., Lichtenegger, K. M., Schwarz, C., Motschnig, M., Kamolz, L., Pieber, T. R., Sendlhofer, G., Mader, J. K., & Hoffmann, M. M. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1593296/v1 · Cited by 1
Challa, D. K. (2013) · Unisa Institutional Repository (University of South Africa) · Cited by 1
Ability to Share Knowledge of Doctors in Teaching Hospital in Indonesia
Firdaus, O. M., Suryadi, K., Govindaraju, R., & Samadhi, T. M. A. A. (2013) · Integrated series on information systems/Integrated series in information systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7392-4_11
Meaningful electronic medical record use : a survey of famly practice clinics
Tagg, B. L. (2015) · Open ULeth Scholarship (OPUS) (University of Lethbridge)
Coles, G., & Smart, W. (2013) · Cross Connect (Southern Cross University)
Fevrier-Thomas, U. (2011) · MacSphere (McMaster University) · doi:10.71548/19069
Mäntymäki, M. (2011) · Journal of the Association for Information Systems
Medidas de Seguridad en la Implantación del Historial Clínico Electrónico (HCE)
García, J. N., & Díez, I. D. L. T. (2011) · Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)
Sharma, U. (2011) · Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London)
New directions in clinical outcomes assessment
Al‐Khatib, S. M. (2011) · Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology · doi:10.1007/s10840-011-9608-7
Enhancing The Privacy Framework: An analysis of Privacy in Canadian and Brazilian health care
Poole, T. B. (2014) · DalSpace (Dalhousie University)
Supporting Stakeholder Needs by Ceding Control: The Benefits of Listening to End-Users
Glascock, A. P., & Kutzık, D. M. (2011) · International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare · doi:10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2011.245997
Metadata
- Authors
- Boonstra, A., & Broekhuis, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Boonstra, Albert
- Venue
- BMC Health Services Research
- Published
- 2010-08-06
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 231-231
- ISSN
- 1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC2924334
- OpenAlex
- W2155857546
- Cited by
- 851
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 30 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 47 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 75 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 73 · 2014: 67 · 2013: 68 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 6.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › ERP Systems Implementation and Impact
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
- Keywords
- electronic health records, physician acceptance, technology adoption barriers, EMR implementation, change management, organizational barriers, financial barriers, legal barriers, social barriers, psychological barriers, time barriers, technical challenges, implementation strategies, medical practice
- MeSH terms
- Attitude to Computers, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Physicians, Electronic Health Records
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
