Cited by 173Nutritional Studies and DietNutrition and Health StudiesNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Validity and reproducibility of an interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire for healthy French-Canadian men and women

Open access
Goulet, Julie, Nadeau, Geneviève, Lapointe, Annie, Lamarche, Benoît, Lemieux, Simone·2004·Nutrition Journal

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the validity (study 1) and the reproducibility (study 2) of an interviewer-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ). Method: The FFQ was designed at Laval University and contains 91 items and 33 subquestions. Study 1: The FFQ was compared against a 3-day food record (2 week-days and 1 weekend-day), at week 0, 6 and 12 of a nutritional intervention. Study 2: In order to evaluate the reproducibility of the FFQ, 2 registered dietitians administered the FFQ 4-weeks apart among subjects who were not part of the nutritional intervention. Results: Study 1: Mean values for intake of most nutrients assessed by the FFQ and by the 3-day food record were not statistically different. Energy-adjusted correlation coefficients for major macronutrients ranged from 0.36 for proteins to 0.60 for carbohydrates (p ≤ 0.01). Agreement analysis revealed that on average, 35% of the subjects were classified in the same quartile when nutrients were assessed by either the 3-day food record or the FFQ. Study 2: Significant associations were observed between dietary measurements derived from the two FFQs administered 4 weeks apart. Correlation coefficients for the reproducibility of macronutrients ranged from 0.66 for carbohydrates to 0.83 for lipids after energy adjustment. On average, 46% of the subjects were classified in the same quartile when nutrient intakes were assessed by either FFQ. Conclusion: These data indicated that the FFQ developed has a good validity and is reproducible.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1475-2891-3-13

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Airlie LohmanT, RocheA and MartorelR Standardization of anthropometric measurements The Airlie (VA) Concensus Conference 1988 Champaign, Ill, Human Kinetics 39 80

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Goulet, J., Nadeau, G., Lapointe, A., Lamarche, B., & Lemieux, S.
Affiliations
Université Laval (CA)
Corresponding author
Lemieux, Simone
Venue
Nutrition Journal
Published
2004-09-13
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
13-13
ISSN
1475-2891 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103904025
Cited by
173
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrition Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
food frequency questionnaire, interviewer-administered questionnaire, questionnaire validity, reproducibility, 3-day food record, dietary assessment, macronutrient intake, dietary intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review