Cited by 45Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchPoisoning and overdose treatmentsForensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis

Pharmacological interventions in the treatment of the acute effects of cannabis: a systematic review of literature

Open access
Crippa, José AS, Derenusson, Guilherme N, Chagas, Marcos HN, Atakan, Zerrin, Martín-Santos, Rocio, Zuardi, Antonio W, Hallak, Jaime EC·2012·Harm Reduction Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cannabis intoxication is related to a number of physical and mental health risks with ensuing social costs. However, little attention has been given to the investigation of possible pharmacological interactions in this condition. OBJECTIVE: To review the available scientific literature concerning pharmacological interventions for the treatment of the acute effects of cannabis. METHODS: A search was performed on the Pubmed, Lilacs, and Scielo online databases by combining the terms cannabis, intoxication, psychosis, anxiety, and treatment. The articles selected from this search had their reference lists checked for additional publications related to the topic of the review. RESULTS: The reviewed articles consisted of case reports and controlled clinical trials and are presented according to interventions targeting the physiological, psychiatric, and cognitive symptoms provoked by cannabis. The pharmacological interventions reported in these studies include: beta-blockers, antiarrhythmic agents, antagonists of CB-1 and GABA-benzodiazepine receptors, antipsychotics, and cannabidiol. CONCLUSION: Although scarce, the evidence on pharmacological interventions for the management of cannabis intoxication suggests that propanolol and rimonabant are the most effective compounds currently available to treat the physiological and subjective effects of the drug. Further studies are necessary to establish the real effectiveness of these two medications, as well as the effectiveness of other candidate compounds to counteract the effects of cannabis intoxication, such as cannabidiol and flumazenil.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1477-7517-9-7

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. National Center for the Development of Natural Products Quarterly Report Potency Monitoring Project M, 2003-August 8, 2003: NIDA Marijuana Project 2003 University, Miss: Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi
  2. Association AP Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 1994 4 Washington DC: American Psychiatric Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crippa, J. A., Derenusson, G. N., Chagas, M. H., Atakan, Z., Martín-Santos, R., Zuardi, A. W., & Hallak, J. E.
Affiliations
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (BR)
  • King's College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Crippa, José AS
Venue
Harm Reduction Journal
Published
2012
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
7
ISSN
1477-7517 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103561274
Cited by
45
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Harm Reduction Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Poisoning and overdose treatments
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Keywords
cannabis intoxication, acute cannabis effects, pharmacological interventions, beta-blockers, propranolol, rimonabant, CB1 receptor antagonist, flumazenil, antipsychotic drugs, cannabidiol, cannabis-induced psychosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review