Cited by 535Cannabis and Cannabinoid ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMedicinal Plant Extracts Effects

Neural basis of anxiolytic effects of cannabidiol (CBD) in generalized social anxiety disorder: A preliminary report

Crippa, José Alexandre S, Derenusson, Guilherme Nogueira, Ferrari, Thiago Borduqui, Wichert-Ana, Lauro, Duran, Fábio LS, Martin-Santos, Rocio, Simões, Marcus Vinícius, Bhattacharyya, Sagnik +8 more·2011·Journal of Psychopharmacology

Abstract

Animal and human studies indicate that cannabidiol (CBD), a major constituent of cannabis, has anxiolytic properties. However, no study to date has investigated the effects of this compound on human pathological anxiety and its underlying brain mechanisms. The aim of the present study was to investigate this in patients with generalized social anxiety disorder (SAD) using functional neuroimaging. Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) at rest was measured twice using (99m)Tc-ECD SPECT in 10 treatment-naïve patients with SAD. In the first session, subjects were given an oral dose of CBD (400 mg) or placebo, in a double-blind procedure. In the second session, the same procedure was performed using the drug that had not been administered in the previous session. Within-subject between-condition rCBF comparisons were performed using statistical parametric mapping. Relative to placebo, CBD was associated with significantly decreased subjective anxiety (p < 0.001), reduced ECD uptake in the left parahippocampal gyrus, hippocampus, and inferior temporal gyrus (p < 0.001, uncorrected), and increased ECD uptake in the right posterior cingulate gyrus (p < 0.001, uncorrected). These results suggest that CBD reduces anxiety in SAD and that this is related to its effects on activity in limbic and paralimbic brain areas.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0269881110379283

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBD does not produce psychotropic effects, probably because of its low affinity for CB1 receptors.

    “Unlike THC, CBD does not produce psychotropic effects and this is probably because of its low affinity for CB1 receptors 55– 57.”
  • In treatment-naïve patients with generalised SAD, a single dose of CBD significantly reduces anxiety and associated anticipatory alert, as well as discomfort provoked during a public-speaking test.

    “In treatment-naïve patients with generalised SAD a single dose of CBD was found to significantly reduce anxiety and associated anticipatory alert, as well as discomfort provoked during a public-speaking test (Bergamaschi et al., 2011;Crippa et al., 2011).”
  • The anxiolytic effect of CBD in SAD patients was associated with reduced activity in the hippocampus, parahippocampal and left temporal gyrus, and increased activity in the posterior cingulated.

    “The anxiolytic effect was associated with reduced activity in the hippocampus, parahippocampal and left temporal gyrus, and increased activity in the posterior cingulated (Figure 4).”
  • In treatment-naive SAD patients, CBD reduced subjective measures of anxiety without inducing sedation compared to placebo.

    “We found that, when compared to placebo, CBD was able to reduce subjective measures of anxiety without inducing sedation in treatment-naive SAD patients.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crippa, J. A. S., Derenusson, G. N., Ferrari, T. B., Wichert-Ana, L., Duran, F. L., Martin-Santos, R., Simões, M. V., Bhattacharyya, S., Fusar-Poli, P., Atakan, Z., Filho, A. S., Freitas-Ferrari, M. C., McGuire, P. K., Zuardi, A. W., Busatto, G. F., & Hallak, J. E. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • NCT Translational Medicine.
  • Department of Psychological Medicine, Section of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychiatry, University of London, UK.
  • Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
  • University of London (GB)
  • Departments of Neurosciences and Behavior, Division of Psychiatry, University of São Paulo, Brazil.
Corresponding author
Crippa, José Alexandre S
Venue
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Published
2010-09-09
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
121-130
ISSN
  • 0269-8811 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7285
OpenAlex
W2044573242
Cited by
535
References
115
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 65 · 2021: 73 · 2020: 72 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 15
FWCI
7.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scientific Electronic Library Online (São Paulo Research Foundation, Latin American and Caribbean Center on Health Sciences Information, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Medicinal Plant Extracts Effects
Keywords
cannabidiol, generalized social anxiety disorder, anxiolytic effects, regional cerebral blood flow, parahippocampal gyrus, hippocampus, inferior temporal gyrus, posterior cingulate cortex, limbic system, cannabis
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Brain, Cannabidiol, Cerebrovascular Circulation, Double-Blind Method, Humans, Male, Placebos, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Regional Blood Flow, Anti-Anxiety Agents, Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon, Cross-Over Studies, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review