The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Group and individual level analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Mental well-being now features prominently in UK and international health policy. However, progress has been hampered by lack of valid measures that are responsive to change. The objective of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) at both the individual and group level. METHODS: Secondary analysis of twelve different interventional studies undertaken in different populations using WEMWBS as an outcome measure. Standardised response mean (SRM), probability of change statistic (P(^)) and standard error of measurement (SEM) were used to evaluate whether WEMWBS detected statistically important changes at the group and individual level, respectively. RESULTS: Mean change in WEMWBS score ranged from -0.6 to 10.6. SRM ranged from -0.10 (95% CI: -0.35, 0.15) to 1.35 (95% CI: 1.06, 1.64). In 9/12 studies the lower limit of the 95% CI for P(^) was greater than 0.5, denoting responsiveness. SEM ranged from 2.4 to 3.1 units, and at the threshold 2.77 SEM, WEMWBS detected important improvement in at least 12.8% to 45.7% of participants (lower limit of 95% CI>5.0%). CONCLUSIONS: WEMWBS is responsive to changes occurring in a wide range of mental health interventions undertaken in different populations. It offers a secure base for research and development in this rapidly evolving field. Further research using external criteria of change is warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“At an individual level, a change of three or more units is interpreted as representing ‘meaningful change’. 45”
From Feasibility of RESTORE: An online Acceptance and Commitment Therapy intervention to improve palliative care staff wellbeing. (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests
Cronbach, L. J. (1951) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02310555 · Cited by 43,931 · cited 1×
“In the one study undertaken in the adolescent population, WEMWBS demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency [44], however, the Cronbach’s alpha score was lower than that found in the validation study undertaken in an adolescent population [17].”
ResultOn Happiness and Human Potentials: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well-Being
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141 · Cited by 11,567 · cited 1×
“; licensee BioMed Ce Creative Commons Attribution License (http:/ distribution, and reproduction in any medium and that it covers both eudaimonic (psychological functioning) and hedonic (affective) dimensions [12].”
BackgroundJacobson, N. S., & Truax, P. (1991) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.59.1.12 · Cited by 7,770 · cited 1×
“96√2 × SEM) takes into account measurement error, the combined variability across the baseline and post intervention samples, and chance at the 95% confidence interval [32,33].”
BackgroundThe Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation
Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., Parkinson, J., Secker, J., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/1477-7525-5-63 · Cited by 5,031 · cited 5×
“WEMWBS is a valid, reliable and acceptable measure [13], which we have demonstrated, is responsive to change in a wide variety of settings from the community settings, to schools, and psychiatric hospitals, making it suitable for use in evaluation of interventions at group and individual level.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationJaeschke, R., Singer, J., & Guyatt, G. H. (1989) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(89)90005-6 · Cited by 4,982 · cited 1×
“5 units on each item on a Likert scale would equate to an improvement deemed important by individuals [45].”
BackgroundMental illness and/or mental health? Investigating axioms of the complete state model of health
Keyes, C. L. M. (2005) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.73.3.539 · Cited by 3,357 · cited 1×
“While debate surrounds the precise definitions of both well-being and mental well-being [10,11], there is broad consensus that the latter is more than the absence of mental illness”
BackgroundReport by the commission on the measurement of economic performance and social progress
Fitoussi, J., Sen, A. K., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2011) · Cited by 2,887
Effect Sizes for Interpreting Changes in Health Status
Kazis, L. E., Anderson, J. J., & Meenan, R. F. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 · Cited by 2,401 · cited 1×
“However, in the literature a variety of statistics have been used to evaluate responsiveness at the group-level, including the paired t-test [35] and Cohen’s effect size (mean change in score by the standard deviation of the baseline score) [36].”
MethodIndividual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate?
McHorney, C. A., & Tarlov, A. R. (1995) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/bf01593882 · Cited by 2,206
Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments.
Guyatt, G., Walter, S. D., & Norman, G. (1987) · Journal of Chronic Diseases · doi:10.1016/0021-9681(87)90069-5 · Cited by 1,997 · cited 2×
“Responsive instruments should have the ability to detect changes in health status where these occur [19].”
Background
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–265 of 265
Morley, K. I., Hocking, L., Saunders, C. L., Bousfield, J., Bostock, J., Brimicombe, J., Burgoine, T., Dawney, J., Hofman, J., Lee, D., et al. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298701 · Cited by 2
“The minimally important level of change is between 3 and 8 points [41,42].”
Two studies evaluating the Stoicism programme at a foreign national prison
Frost, G., Trant, R., & Seaward, J. (2024) · Journal of Forensic Practice · doi:10.1108/jfp-11-2023-0067 · Cited by 1
Kolovou, V., Kolosowska, A., Embling, R., Mchugh, N., Bradley, J., & Pilkington, P. (2024) · Journal of Physical Activity and Health · doi:10.1123/jpah.2024-0205 · Cited by 1
Santos, A. C., Long, S., Moreno, C. P., & Bycura, D. K. (2025) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph22081227 · Cited by 4
“The WEMWBS was further validated and shown to be sensitive to change in groups and individuals across five studies in 2012, with Cronbach’s α ≥ 0.86 [87].”
InfluentialValidation of the Stirling Children’s Well-being Scale in an Irish Sample
Cho, T. T. P., Shevlin, M., Grennan, S., McKenna, N., O’Dowd, A., Nearchou, F., Murphy, E., & Carr, A. (2026) · International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology · doi:10.1007/s41042-026-00300-1 · Cited by 1
“Similar to the WEMWBS, the SCWBS captures both hedonic and eudaimonic dimensions of well-being, thereby offering a comprehensive foundation for effectively detecting changes in overall well-being (Maheswaran et al., 2012 ).”
Murphy, J., Nguyen, V. C., Dang, L., Xie, H. W., Tran, T. H. T., Barbic, S. P., Chau, L. W., Samji, H., Minas, H., Nguyen, M. V., et al. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0332875 · Cited by 1
Evaluating the impact of a pilot social prescribing service for the armed forces community
Schoultz, M., Boul, L., Senior, E., Swift, A., & Keirnan, M. D. (2026) · Primary Health Care Research & Development · doi:10.1017/s1463423626100875 · Cited by 1
Burton, A. E., & Elliott, J. M. (2022) · The Arts in Psychotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.aip.2022.101990 · Cited by 1
“, 2007) and is responsive to change (Maheswaran et al., 2012).”
BackgroundFactors associated with well-being among treatment-seeking UK Veterans: A cross-sectional study
Biscoe, N., & Murphy, D. (2024) · Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health · doi:10.3138/jmvfh-2023-0023 · Cited by 3
Barbalat, G., Berthillot, V., Thenoz, C., & Franck, N. (2025) · Pest Management Science · doi:10.1002/ps.8731 · Cited by 3
“24 WEMWBS was found to have a mean score of 51 in general population samples in the UK.”
Improving Health Behaviors and Outcomes: An Intervention to Support Engagement in Physical Activity
Houghton, L. J., & Knowles, Z. R. (2017) · Case Studies in Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/cssep.2017-0006 · Cited by 1
The Relationship of the Well-being of Adults with and without Dyslexia: A Causal-Comparative Study
Anderson, A. L. (2018) · Digital Commons (Liberty University) · Cited by 1
Dosumu, A. A. (2016) · Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) · Cited by 1
King, R., Warren, S., Vass, E., Sharpe, B. T., Beaumont, K., Seymour, S., Bell, S., & Pereira, A. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.01.10.26343830 · Cited by 1
Webber, M., Scott, C., Carr, S., & Coldham, T. (2015) · Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London)
Sports and Spirits: A Mixed Methods Investigation of Student Sportspeople's Drinking.
Zhou, J. (2015) · Edge Hill University
Ferreira, C. (2015) · Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Strange, C. (2015) · UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia)
EvaluationofMentalEffectiveness Trainingforpeoplewithexperienceof usingmentalhealthservices
Webber, M., Scott, C., Carr, S., & Coldham, T. (2015)
Webber, M., Scott, C., Carr, S., & Coldham, T. (2015) · White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York)
Mack, D. E., Wilson, P. M., & Gunnell, K. E. (2018) · International handbooks of quality-of-life · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-75529-8_22
Resilience in adolescent mental health
Fontaine, C. (2026) · Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) · doi:10.82444/warw.33802771
Peddie, N., Snowden, A., & Westbury, T. (2021) · Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Mental Health · doi:10.1007/s40737-021-00246-4
Development and Validation of the Thai Mental Well-Being ScalePreprint
Pimthong, S., Suwanwong, C., Surakarn, A., Chiangkhong, A., Sumalrot, T., & Khunakorncharatphong, A. (2021) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3994671
Hatcher, S., Werier, J. A., Edgar, N. E., Booth, J., Cameron, D. W., Corrales‐Medina, V., Corsi, D. J., Cowan, J., Giguère, P., Kaluzienski, M., et al. (2022) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1723719/v1
The better mental health project: Orchard House Day Hospital
Devine, L., & Kemp, L. (2022) · FPOP Bulletin Psychology of Older People · doi:10.53841/bpsfpop.2022.1.159.25
Indriyani, S. L., Hermasari, B. K., & Nugroho, D. (2023) · Springer Proceedings in Humanities and Social Sciences · doi:10.1007/978-981-99-4573-3_20
Lawrence, C., & Ellison, D. (2023) · British Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1177/03080226231208053
“It has high face validity and content validity (Tennant, 2007) and the responsiveness of the measure is shown to be independent of the sample size the of population and the type of intervention and is considered responsive enough to detect changes within a person or population (Maheswaran, 2012).”
BackgroundResultBallou, N., Sewall, C. J. R., Ratcliffe, J., Zendle, D. I., Tokarchuk, L. N., & Deterding, S. (2024) · Technology Mind and Behavior · doi:10.1037/tmb0000124.supp
Mitchell, A. S., Booth, A., Morgan, S. A., Walker, I., Chapman, C., Barlow-Pay, M., Cochrane, A., Filby, E., Fleming, J., Hewitt, C. E., et al. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081179
Booth, A., Morgan, S. A., Walker, I., Mitchell, A. S., Barlow-Pay, M., Chapman, C., Cochrane, A., Filby, E., Fleming, J., Hewitt, C. E., et al. (2024) · Public Health Research · doi:10.3310/ntfw7364
Bengoechea, E. G., & Woods, C. B. (2025) · European Journal of Ageing · doi:10.1007/s10433-025-00847-z
“…of The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) (Tennant et al. 2007), which has demonstrated high correlation with other scales that measure positive mental health and well-being (Tennant et al. 2007), while being highly sensitive to changes in mental well-being (Maheswaran et al. 2012).”
Leese, C. J., Smith, B. H., Cross, R., Cockcroft, E., & Higgins, C. (2025) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-025-22447-3 · Cited by 3
“…for muscle mass, body fat mass and visceral fat, the threshold for BMI (i.e. a 5% reduction) was used; (3) a reduction of ≥ 10 mmHg in systolic BP or a reduction of ≥ 5 mmHg in diastolic BP [33]; (4) [33]; a ≥ 3-point improvement on WEMWBS [34]; and (5) a ≥ 4-point improvement on PAM-SF [35–37].”
Karanasiou, M., Coates, R., & Kingston, J. L. (2025) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2025.2488475
“The primary outcome measure for a full-scale RCT would be wellbeing, measured by the WEMWBS, where the minimum clinically important difference is estimated as a change score of 3 points (Maheswaran et al., 2012).”
EKİNCİ, N., & Tokkaş, B. G. (2025) · Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi · doi:10.17066/tpdrd.1425534
“Although there is no consensus on the clear definitions of the two concepts, there is a consensus that the concept of mental well - being includes both hedonic (subjective well - being) and eudaimonic (psychological well - being) dimensions (Maheswaran et al., 2012).”
Bowles, N., Burger, A., Davies, J. N., Simpson, J. A., Galante, J., Dennis, S., Stone, B., & Van Dam, N. T. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/72786
“Previous analyses of responsiveness to change analyses indicate that the WEMWBS detects individually meaningful improvement across a variety of mental health measures [35].”
InfluentialThe occurrence and persistence of Imposter Phenomenon in clinicians and medical students in WalesPreprint
Jose, J., Barter-Jones, A., Dave, U., Brown, M., & Hoon, A. E. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.06.09.25329299
Pretty, D., Norwood, M. F., Ownsworth, T., Dungey, K., Jones, S. A., Gomes, Z., Clanchy, K., & Kendall, E. A. (2025) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/69452
“It has shown sensitivity to change from hospital-based remediation programs with patients with schizophrenia [61] and has been validated as being responsive at the individual level [62].”
CBT for psychosis with a young adult experiencing grandiose beliefs: a case study
Brown, P., Isham, L., & Johns, L. (2025) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x25100214
“A change in 3 or more points is considered reliable and clinically significant change (Maheswaran et al ., 2012).”
Percy, C. A., Turner, A., Alper, B., & Wark, P. A. (2025) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/69206
“A change of 3 or more is regarded as a meaningful change in positive well-being [56].”
Griffiths, C., & Jiang, H. (2025) · Psychology · doi:10.4236/psych.2025.1611073
Holt, N. J., Baber, D., & Elliott, C. (2026) · European Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckag151
“The scale has shown excellent internal consistency, construct validity, and responsiveness to change [21, 22].”
InfluentialBarth Vedøy, I., Skulberg, K. R., Anderssen, S. A., Fagerland, M. W., Tjomsland, H. E., & Thurston, M. N. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17031049
Barth Vedøy, I., Skulberg, K. R., Anderssen, S. A., Fagerland, M. W., Tjomsland, H. E., & Thurston, M. N. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17031046
Barth Vedøy, I., Skulberg, K. R., Anderssen, S. A., Fagerland, M. W., Tjomsland, H. E., & Thurston, M. N. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17031037
Connor, C., Valliere, N. D., Warwick, J., Stewart-Brown, S., & Thompson, A. (2022) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.19711094
Self-citationBarth Vedøy, I., Skulberg, K. R., Anderssen, S. A., Fagerland, M. W., Tjomsland, H. E., & Thurston, M. N. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17031043
Wright, H., Walker-Clarke, A., Drummond, A., Kidd, L., Yeates, G., Williams, D., McWilliams, D., Clyne, W., Clark, C. C. T., Kimani, P., et al. (2023) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24669888
Luttenberger, K., Baggenstos, B., Najem, C., Sifri, C., Lewczuk, P., Radegast, A., & Rosenbaum, S. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.27020809
Barth Vedøy, I., Skulberg, K. R., Anderssen, S., Fagerland, M. W., Tjomsland, H. E., & Thurston, M. N. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.17031040
Lan, X., Hu, X., Lan, Z., Wang, L., He, R., & Jiang, Z. (2025) · Journal of Pain Research · doi:10.2147/jpr.s556779
“(3) Mental Well-being Analysis: Psychological status is assessed employing the validated 14-item Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS), 16 which encompasses three domains: affective (eg, “I feel happy”), cognitive (eg, “I am hopeful about the future”), and conative functioning.”
Howard, L. R., Earleywine, M., DeCount, T., & Forsyth, J. P. (2026) · Clinical Case Studies · doi:10.1177/15346501261421541
“This change suggests that therapy enhanced her broader sense of wellbeing (Maheswaran et al., 2012).”
Finucane, A. M., Canny, A., Harrop, E. J., Selman, L. E., Swash, B., Spiller, J. A., Neilson, A., Hulbert-Williams, N., Wakefield, D., Owen, R., et al. (2025) · Progress in Palliative Care · doi:10.1080/09699260.2026.2637281
“Mental wellbeing was assessed using the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale [31,32].”
Leonard, R. A., Truesdale, M., Brown, M., Marsh, L., Todd, S., Hughes, N., Forbes, T. L., Crowe, A. L., & Linden, M. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0345096
Tharrey, M. (2020) · theses.fr (ABES) · doi:10.70675/b265c475zc8b2z4b94z93e5z166e9df93665
Shekhar, A., & Saurombe, M. D. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1706890
“Each is widely used and psycho-metrically supported, including in multi-country research (Blodgett et al., 2022; Diener et al., 2010; Maheswaran et al., 2012; Schaufeli and Bakker, 2003).”
Farrall, A., Sharma, A., Ainsworth, B., Jacobsen, P. C., & Alexander, J. (2026) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3772318.3790933
“…have coincided with a period of atypical routines (winter break), increasing the likelihood of confounding influences. threshold of 44 thus includes individuals experiencing clinically meaningful distress who remain suitable for a self-directed digital intervention without therapist oversight [54].”
Pedrosa-Vazquez, C., Ayuso-Margañón, R., Lidón-Moyano, C., Morales, P., Canas, L., Garriga-Salvó, C., Farfan-Dominguez, B., Rey-Vitó, S., & Llistosella, M. (2026) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2026-118438
Schmidt‐Persson, J., Gejl, A. K., Philipsen, K. B., Johansen, M. S., Mathiesen, J., Taylor, R., Flensborg‐Madsen, T., Kristensen, P. L., & Grøntved, A. (2026) · BMC Psychology · doi:10.1186/s40359-026-04827-5
“Previous work suggests that 3 points on the WEMWBS represent the lower bound of meaningful change on the scale [37, 63].”
Re-validation of the Cancer Research UK Cancer Awareness Measure ‘plus’ (CAM+): a study protocol
Nikšić, M., Hamilton-West, K. E., Forbes, L. J. L., Osborne, K., Brasnell, L. S. H., Hulbert, S., Day, K., Whitelock, V., & Hotham, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2026.1841597
Ward, L. O., Bailey, C., Wattanatakulchat, P., Stone, B., Bürger, A., Kaplan, D. M., Alvarez, S. J. A., Joyce, C., Eclair, A., Dam, N. T. V., et al. (2026) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/85110 · Cited by 1
“Previous analyses of responsiveness to change indicate that the SWEMWBS detects individually meaningful improvement across a variety of mental health measures [63].”
InfluentialLanghans, K. E., Dayer, A. A., Cooper, C. B., Dietsch, A. M., Hall, R. J., Hawley, D. M., Hochachka, W. M., Lawson, B., McGregor, F., Phillips, T., et al. (2026) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-026-02471-2
Art therapy-based group for mental health professionals: a feasibility study
Strong, Z., & Holttum, S. (2026) · International Journal of Art Therapy · doi:10.1080/17454832.2026.2717161
Clack, T., & Lewis, C. (2026) · Public Archaeology · doi:10.1080/14655187.2026.2731986
Metadata
- Authors
- Maheswaran, H., Weich, S., Powell, J., & Stewart-Brown, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Warwick (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Maheswaran, Hendramoorthy
- Venue
- Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
- Published
- 2012
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 156
- ISSN
- 1477-7525 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3560098
- OpenAlex
- W2139610815
- Cited by
- 265
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6
- FWCI
- 10.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- Warwick Research Archive Portal (University of Warwick) (acceptedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- NHS Health Scotland
- University of Warwick
- University of Bath
- University of Edinburgh
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
- Keywords
- Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale, responsiveness to change, psychological well-being, mental health interventions, standardized response mean, standard error of measurement, psychometric properties, outcome measurement
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Middle Aged, Personal Satisfaction, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Confidence Intervals, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
