Cited by 381Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsDelphi Technique in Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement

Open access

Husereau, Don, Drummond, Michael, Petrou, Stavros, Carswell, Chris, Moher, David, Greenberg, Dan, Augustovski, Federico, Briggs, Andrew H, Mauskopf, Josephine, Loder, Elizabeth, on behalf of the CHEERS Task Force·2013·Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation

DOI 10.1186/1478-7547-11-6PMC PMC3607888

Open this paper in CoChat — free account Open PDF

Abstract

Economic evaluations of health interventions pose a particular challenge for reporting. There is also a need to consolidate and update existing guidelines and promote their use in a user friendly manner. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance. The primary audiences for the CHEERS statement are researchers reporting economic evaluations and the editors and peer reviewers assessing them for publication.The need for new reporting guidance was identified by a survey of medical editors. A list of possible items based on a systematic review was created. A two round, modified Delphi panel consisting of representatives from academia, clinical practice, industry, government, and the editorial community was conducted. Out of 44 candidate items, 24 items and accompanying recommendations were developed. The recommendations are contained in a user friendly, 24 item checklist. A copy of the statement, accompanying checklist, and this report can be found on the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Task Force website (http://www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp).We hope CHEERS will lead to better reporting, and ultimately, better health decisions. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the CHEERS statement is being co-published across 10 health economics and medical journals. We encourage other journals and groups, to endorse CHEERS. The author team plans to review the checklist for an update in five years.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1478-7547-11-6

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figure 1 Forms of economic evaluation.CC BY · PubMed Central

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Self-citation
Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
(1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.001.0001 · Cited by 7,193
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., & Loder, E. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 · Cited by 1,998
Self-citation
Guidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ
Drummond, M. F., & Jefferson, T. O. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275 · Cited by 1,827
Self-citation
Guidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Simera, I., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217 · Cited by 1,437
Self-citation
Recommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses
Siegel, J. E. (1996) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540160061034 · Cited by 1,147
Recommendations for reporting cost-effectiveness analyses. Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
Siegel, J. E. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.276.16.1339 · Cited by 1,040
Good Research Practices for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Alongside Clinical Trials: The ISPOR RCT-CEA Task Force Report
Ramsey, S. D., Willke, R. J., Briggs, A. H., Brown, R. E., Buxton, M. J., Chawla, A., Cook, J. R., Glick, H. A., Liljas, B., Petitti, D. B., et al. (2005) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00045.x · Cited by 720
Self-citation
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa
Turner, L., Shamseer, L., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., & Moher, D. (2012) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-60 · Cited by 628
Self-citation
Key principles for the improved conduct of health technology assessments for resource allocation decisions
Drummond, M., Schwartz, J. S., Jönsson, B., Luce, B. R., Neumann, P. J., Siebert, U., & Sullivan, S. D. (2008) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462308080343 · Cited by 489
Self-citation

Show all 25 references

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 377

Developing Behavior Change Interventions
Hankonen, N. E., & Hardeman, W. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.021 · Cited by 28
Cost-Effectiveness Of A Workplace Ban On Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Sales: A Microsimulation Model
Basu, S., Jacobs, L. M., Epel, E. S., Schillinger, D., & Schmidt, L. A. (2020) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2019.01483 · Cited by 24
Intravitreal aflibercept compared with panretinal photocoagulation for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: the CLARITY non-inferiority RCT
Sivaprasad, S., Hykin, P. G., Prevost, A. T., Vasconcelos, J. C., Riddell, A., Ramu, J., Murphy, C., Kelly, J., Edwards, R. T., Yeo, S. T., et al. (2018) · Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation · doi:10.3310/eme05050 · Cited by 25
Cost-utility analysis of influenza vaccination in a population aged 65 years or older in Spain with a high-dose vaccine versus an adjuvanted vaccine
Redondo, E., Drago, G., López-Belmonte, J. L., Guillén, J. M., Bricout, H., Alvarez, F. P., Callejo, D., & de Miguel, Á. G. (2021) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.07.048 · Cited by 25
Scoping review of costs of implementation strategies in community, public health and healthcare settings
Michaud, T. L., Pereira, E. L., Porter, G. C., Golden, C. A., Hill, J. L., Kim, J., Wang, H., Schmidt, C., & Estabrooks, P. A. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060785 · Cited by 29
Moving from Theoretical Principles to Intervention Strategies: Applying the Experimental Medicine Approach
Rothman, A. J., Klein, W. M. P., & Sheeran, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.020 · Cited by 26
The modelled cost-effectiveness of cognitive dissonance for the prevention of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa in adolescent girls in Australia
Le, L. K., Barendregt, J. J., Hay, P., Sawyer, S. M., Paxton, S. J., & Mihalopoulos, C. (2017) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22703 · Cited by 25
Cost-effectiveness of exercise versus multimodal interventions that include exercise to prevent falls among community-dwelling older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Adjetey, C., Karnon, B., Falck, R. S., Balasubramaniam, H., Buschert, K., & Davis, J. C. (2023) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2022.12.003 · Cited by 22
Economic evaluations of onchocerciasis interventions: a systematic review and research needs
Turner, H. C., Walker, M., Pion, S. D. S., McFarland, D. A., Bundy, D. A. P., & Basáñez, M.-G. (2019) · Tropical Medicine & International Health · doi:10.1111/tmi.13241 · Cited by 22
“Greater adherence to standardised guidelines for reporting the results of economic evaluations (such as CHEERS for cost-effectiveness analysis (123)) would be”
Background
Imagery, Visualization, and Mental Simulation Interventions
Hagger, M. S., & Conroy, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.033 · Cited by 23
Changing Behavior Using the Common-Sense Model of Self-Regulation
Cameron, L. D., Fleszar‐Pavlović, S. E., & Khachikian, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.005 · Cited by 29
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Lymph Node Transfer vs Lymphovenous Bypass for Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema
Sekigami, Y., Char, S., Mullen, C., Huber, K. E., Cao, Y., Buchsbaum, R. J., Graham, R. A., Nardello, S. M., Singhal, D., & Chatterjee, A. (2021) · Journal of the American College of Surgeons · doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.02.013 · Cited by 22
Intravitreal ranibizumab versus aflibercept versus bevacizumab for macular oedema due to central retinal vein occlusion: the LEAVO non-inferiority three-arm RCT
Hykin, P. G., Prevost, A. T., Sivaprasad, S., Vasconcelos, J. C., Murphy, C., Kelly, J., Ramu, J., Alshreef, A., Flight, L., Pennington, B., et al. (2021) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta25380 · Cited by 21
Defining a Core Data Set for the Economic Evaluation of Precision Oncology
Pollard, S., Weymann, D., Chan, B. W., Ehman, M., Wordsworth, S., Buchanan, J., Hanna, T. P., Ho, C., Lim, H. J., Lorgelly, P. K., et al. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2022.01.005 · Cited by 21
The costs, health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and treatment of incontinence-associated dermatitis: A systematic review
Cunich, M. M., Barakat‐Johnson, M., Lai, M., Arora, S. K., Church, J., Basjarahil, S., Campbell, J. L., Disher, G. J., Geering, S., Ko, N., et al. (2022) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2022.104216 · Cited by 21
Photobiomodulation in the management of oral mucositis for adult head and neck cancer patients receiving irradiation: the LiTEFORM RCT
Nugent, M., Bryant, V., Butcher, C., Fisher, H., Gill, S., Goranova, R., Hiu, S. K. W., Lindley, L., O’Hara, J., Oluboyede, Y., et al. (2022) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/uwnb3375 · Cited by 23
Predictors of Severe Neurologic Injury on Ultrasound Scan of the Head and Risk Factor-based Screening for Infants Born Preterm
Beltempo, M., Wintermark, P., Lemyre, B., Shalish, W., Martel-Bucci, A., Narvey, M. R., Ng, E. H., Guillot, M., Shah, P. S., Kanungo, J., et al. (2019) · The Journal of Pediatrics · doi:10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.065 · Cited by 21
Evaluation of the cost-utility of phosphate binders as a treatment option for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the economic evaluations
Chaiyakittisopon, K., Pattanaprateep, O., Ruenroengbun, N., Sapankaew, T., Ingsathit, A., McKay, G. J., Attia, J., & Thakkinstian, A. (2021) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-021-01275-3 · Cited by 21
“The data extraction forms (see Supplementary Methods S2) were designed by incorporating information from the consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standard (CHEERS) statement [31, 32], the NHS-EED [33], and the centre for”
Method
Cost-effectiveness of physiotherapeutic interventions for low back pain: a systematic review
Fatoye, F., Wright, J., & Gebrye, T. (2020) · Physiotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.physio.2020.04.010 · Cited by 19
Engagement of Stakeholders in the Design, Evaluation, and Implementation of Complex Interventions
Hudson, J. L., Moon, Z., Hughes, L. D., & Moss-Morris, R. E. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.024 · Cited by 20
Uterine artery embolisation or myomectomy for women with uterine fibroids wishing to avoid hysterectomy: a cost–utility analysis of the FEMME trial
Rana, D., Wu, O., Cheed, V., Middleton, L., Moss, J. G., Lumsden, M., McKinnon, W., DANIELS, J. P., Sirkeci, F., Manyonda, I., et al. (2021) · BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/1471-0528.16781 · Cited by 20
Incentive-Based Interventions
Uri Gneezy, B., Kajackaite, A., & Meier, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.036 · Cited by 20
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration versus mediastinoscopy for mediastinal staging of lung cancer: A systematic review of economic evaluation studies
Motta, J. P. S., Steffen, R. E., Lobato, C. S. S., Mendonça, V. S., & Silva, J. R. L. E. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0235479 · Cited by 19
Mobile Health Apps and Health Management Behaviors: Cost-Benefit Modeling Analysis
Mano, R. S. (2020) · JMIR Human Factors · doi:10.2196/21251 · Cited by 20
“Many studies have assessed the feasibility, functionality, clinical utility, benefits, and risks of mobile health apps [12-16].”
Background
Small effects of smoking on visual spatiotemporal processing
Kunchulia, M., Pilz, K. S., & Herzog, M. H. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep07316 · Cited by 18
Economics of Early Warning Scores for identifying clinical deterioration—a systematic review
Murphy, A., Cronin, J., Whelan, R., Drummond, F. J., Savage, E., & Hegarty, J. M. (2017) · Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) · doi:10.1007/s11845-017-1631-y · Cited by 19
Economic Evaluation of an Internet-Based Stress Management Intervention Alongside a Randomized Controlled Trial
Kählke, F., Buntrock, C., Smit, F., Berking, M., Lehr, D., Heber, E., Funk, B., Riper, H. M., & Ebert, D. D. (2018) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/10866 · Cited by 21
“The present health-economic evaluation followed guidelines from the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research RCT-cost-effectiveness analysis Task Force report and the recommendations of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standard [24,25].”
Distributional equity as a consideration in economic and modelling evaluations of health taxes: A systematic review
Jain, V., Crosby, L., Baker, P., & Chalkidou, K. (2020) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2020.05.022 · Cited by 21
Vaccine storage and distribution between expanded program on immunization and medical store department in Tanzania: a cost-minimization analysis
Bulula, N., Philemon, D. B., Swalehe, O., & Mori, A. T. (2020) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.10.088 · Cited by 19
Single-incision mini-slings versus standard synthetic mid-urethral slings for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence in women: The SIMS RCT
Abdel‐Fattah, M., Cooper, D., Davidson, T., Kilonzo, M. M., Boyers, D., Bhal, K., McDonald, A. M., Wardle, J., N'Dow, J. M., MacLennan, G., et al. (2022) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/btsa6148 · Cited by 19
Understanding economic evidence for the prevention and treatment of atopic eczema
Sach, T., McManus, E., & Levell, N. J. (2019) · British Journal of Dermatology · doi:10.1111/bjd.17696 · Cited by 18
Systematic review of the methods used in economic evaluations of targeted physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions
Cochrane, M., Watson, P. M., Timpson, H., Haycox, A. R., Collins, B., Jones, L., Martin, A. P., & Graves, L. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.04.040 · Cited by 19
Changing Behavior Using Theories at the Interpersonal, Organizational, Community, and Societal Levels
Ruiter, R. A. C., Crutzen, R., de Leeuw, E., & Kok, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.018 · Cited by 20
Population or family history based BRCA gene tests of breast cancer? A systematic review of economic evaluations
Meshkani, Z. S., Aboutorabi, A., Moradi, N., Langarizadeh, M., & Motlagh, A. G. (2021) · Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1186/s13053-021-00191-0 · Cited by 18
Scaling up Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Costs and their distribution across state, districts, and schools
Lindstrom Johnson, S., Alfonso, Y. N., Pas, E. T., Debnam, K. J., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2020) · School Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/2372966x.2020.1777831 · Cited by 17
The Case for Adolescent HIV Vaccination in South Africa
Moodley, N., Gray, G., & Bertram, M. (2016) · Medicine · doi:10.1097/md.0000000000002528 · Cited by 17
“The study methodology was compliant with the reporting guidelines of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement.(19)”
Method
Optimal pharmacotherapy pathway in adults with diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: the OPTION-DM RCT
Tesfaye, S. H., SLOAN, G. P., Petrie, J., White, D. A., Bradburn, M. J., Young, T. A., Rajbhandari, S. M., Sharma, S., Rayman, G. A., Gouni, R., et al. (2022) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/rxuo6757 · Cited by 17
A randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of a two-week course of dexamethasone for adult patients with a symptomatic Chronic Subdural Haematoma (Dex-CSDH trial)
Hutchinson, P. J., Edlmann, E., HANRAHAN, J. G., Bulters, D. O., Zolnourian, A. H., Holton, P., Suttner, N. J., Agyemang, K., Thomson, S., Anderson, I., et al. (2024) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/xwzn4832 · Cited by 17
Prioritising allocation of donor human breast milk amongst very low birthweight infants in middle‐income countries
Taylor, C., Joolay, Y., Buckle, A., & Lilford, R. (2018) · Maternal & Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.12595 · Cited by 15
Cost-effectiveness analysis of genotype screening and therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with azathioprine therapy: a Chinese healthcare perspective using real-world data
Zeng, D., Huang, X., Lin, S., Lin, R., Weng, X., & Huang, P. (2021) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm-21-1980 · Cited by 15
Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Biomedical, Non-Surgical HIV Prevention Interventions: A Systematic Literature Review
Bozzani, F. M., Terris‐Prestholt, F., Quaife, M., Gafos, M., Indravudh, P. P., Giddings, R., Medley, G. F., Malhotra, S., & Rueda, S. T. (2022) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-022-01223-w · Cited by 16
“The quality of included studies was assessed using the Global Health Costing Consortium (GHCC) reference case for studies that have a substantial primary cost data collection component [16], and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist for economic evaluation studies [17].”
Method
Causal evidence in health decision making: methodological approaches of causal inference and health decision science
Kühne, F., Schomaker, M., Stojkov, I., Jahn, B., Conrads‐Frank, A., Siebert, S., Sroczynski, G., Puntscher, S., Schmid, D., Schnell‐Inderst, P., et al. (2022) · PubMed Central · doi:10.3205/000314 · Cited by 17
Spending of HIV resources in Asia and Eastern Europe: systematic review reveals the need to shift funding allocations towards priority populations
Craig, A. P., Thein, H., Zhang, L., Gray, R. T., Henderson, K., Wilson, D. P., Görgens, M., & Wilson, D. P. (2014) · Journal of the International AIDS Society · doi:10.7448/ias.17.1.18822 · Cited by 16
“139]) but [140] noted that guidelines do not necessarily agree with one another, and that their recommendations do not always provide sufficient detail as to how they should be followed.”
Background
A systematic review of the cost-effectiveness of heart valve replacement with a mechanical versus biological prosthesis in patients with heart valvular disease
Azari, S., Rezapour, A., Omidi, N., Alipour, V., Tajdini, M., Sadeghian, S., & Bragazzi, N. L. (2019) · Heart Failure Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10741-019-09897-9 · Cited by 16
Changing Behavior Using Social Identity Processes
Reynolds, K. J., Branscombe, N. R., Subašić, E., & Willis, L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.016 · Cited by 21
Economic evaluations of non-pharmacological interventions and cost-of-illness studies in bipolar disorder: A systematic review
Kraiss, J. T., Wijnen, B. F. M., Kupka, R., Bohlmeijer, E. T., & Lokkerbol, J. (2020) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.064 · Cited by 16
“healthcare or societal perspective) was also extracted from the studies (Husereau et al., 2013).”
Method
Cost-effectiveness of dedicated dietitians for hyperphosphatemia management among hemodialysis patients in Lebanon: results from the Nutrition Education for Management of Osteodystrophy trial
Rizk, R., Hiligsmann, M., Karavetian, M., & Evers, S. (2017) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2017.1347877 · Cited by 16
What will it cost to prevent violence against women and girls in low- and middle-income countries? Evidence from Ghana, Kenya, Pakistan, Rwanda, South Africa and Zambia
Rueda, S. T., Ferrari, G., Orangi, S., Hitimana, R., Daviaud, E., Tawiah, T. A. S., Prah, R. K. D., Karmaliani, R., Kapapa, E., Barasa, E., et al. (2020) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czaa024 · Cited by 17
How to Critically Appraise the Clinical Literature
Cronin, P., Rawson, J. V., Heilbrun, M. E., Lee, J. M., Kelly, A. M., Sanelli, P. C., Bresnahan, B. W., & Paladin, A. M. (2014) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.004 · Cited by 15
Effectiveness of septoplasty compared to medical management in adults with obstruction associated with a deviated nasal septum: the NAIROS RCT.
Carrie, S., Fouweather, T., Homer, T., O'Hara, J., Rousseau, N., Rooshenas, L., Bray, A., Stocken, D., Ternent, L., Rennie, K., et al. (2024) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/mvfr4028 · Cited by 13
Projected economic evaluation of the national implementation of a hypothetical HIV vaccination program among adolescents in South Africa, 2012
Moodley, N., Gray, G., & Bertram, M. (2016) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-016-2959-3 · Cited by 15
“The study methodology was compliant with the reporting guidelines of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement [16].”
Method
Complaint-Directed Mini-Interventions for Depressive Symptoms: A Health Economic Evaluation of Unguided Web-Based Self-Help Interventions Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial
Wijnen, B. F. M., Lokman, S., Leone, S. S., Evers, S., & Smit, F. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10455 · Cited by 15
“We used the Dutch guidelines for economic evaluations [24] and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards [25] to conduct the economic evaluation and to report the outcomes.”
Strengthening ‘good’ modelling practices in robust decision support: A reporting guideline for combining multiple model-based methods
Moallemi, E. A., Elsawah, S., & Ryan, M. J. (2019) · Mathematics and Computers in Simulation · doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2019.05.002 · Cited by 16
Systematic review of economic evaluations of children’s social care interventions
El-Banna, A., Petrou, S., Yiu, H. H. E., Daher, S., Forrester, D., Scourfield, J., Wilkins, D., Evans, R., Turley, R., & Wallace, S. (2020) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105864 · Cited by 15
Self-citation
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions following total knee replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Fatoye, F., Yeowell, G., Wright, J., & Gebrye, T. (2021) · Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00402-021-03784-5 · Cited by 15
“1 3 out of total 24 were considered good quality whereas those less than 20 poor quality [22].”
BackgroundMethod
Effectiveness, Cost-effectiveness, and Cost-Utility of a Digital Smoking Cessation Intervention for Cancer Survivors: Health Economic Evaluation and Outcomes of a Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial
Mujcic, A., Blankers, M., Boon, B. J. F., Leeuw, I. M. V., Smit, F., van Laar, M., & Engels, R. C. M. E. (2022) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/27588 · Cited by 15
“An economic evaluation was conducted alongside this RCT following the approach of Drummond et al [39] and in concordance with the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement [40].”
A pilot study to assess feasibility of value based pricing in Cyprus through pharmacoeconomic modelling and assessment of its operational framework: sorafenib for second line renal cell cancer
Petrou, P., & Talias, Μ. A. (2014) · Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation · doi:10.1186/1478-7547-12-12 · Cited by 15
An economic evaluation of a multicomponent self‐management intervention for adults with epilepsy ( ZMILE study)
Wijnen, B. F. M., Leenen, L. A. M., de Kinderen, R. J. A., Heugten, C. M. V., Majoie, M., & Evers, S. (2017) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.13806 · Cited by 15
“Costs This economic evaluation was performed according to the Dutch guidelines for economic evaluations(26) and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards.(27) A cost-effectiveness (CEA) and cost-utility analysis (CUA) were performed from a societal perspective to estimate the cost per QALY gain.”
Method
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of a Physician-Implemented Medication Screening Tool in Older Hospitalised Patients in Ireland
O’Brien, G. L., O’Mahony, D., Gillespie, P., Mulcahy, M., Walshe, V., O’Connor, M., O’Sullivan, D., Gallagher, J. R., & Byrne, S. (2018) · Drugs & Aging · doi:10.1007/s40266-018-0564-0 · Cited by 15
Cost-effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence
Hounsome, N., & Roukas, C. (2018) · Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology · doi:10.1177/1756284818802562 · Cited by 15
Cost-effectiveness and Cost-utility of the Adherence Improving Self-management Strategy in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Care: A Trial-based Economic Evaluation
Wijnen, B. F. M., Oberjé, E. J. M., Evers, S., Prins, J. M., Nobel, H., van Nieuwkoop, C., Veenstra, J., Pijnappel, F. J. J., Kroon, F. P., van Zonneveld, L., et al. (2018) · Clinical Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1093/cid/ciy553 · Cited by 15
Examining the cost-effectiveness of personal protective equipment for formal healthcare workers in Kenya during the COVID-19 pandemic
Kazungu, J., Munge, K., Werner, K., Risko, N., Vecino-Ortiz, A. I., & Were, V. O. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-07015-w · Cited by 14
Protocol for the economic evaluation of a complex intervention to improve the mental health of maltreated infants and children in foster care in the UK (The BeST? services trial)
Deidda, M., Boyd, K., Minnis, H., Donaldson, J., Brown, K., Boyer, N. R. S., & McIntosh, E. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020066 · Cited by 14
A systematic review of economic evaluations of antenatal nutrition and alcohol interventions and their associated implementation interventions
Szewczyk, Z., Holliday, E. G., Dean, B., Collins, C. E., & Reeves, P. (2020) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuaa015 · Cited by 16
Economic evaluation of brief cognitive behavioural therapy for social activation in recent-onset psychosis
Wijnen, B. F. M., Pos, K., Velthorst, E., Schirmbeck, F. N., Chan, H. Y., de Haan, L., van der Gaag, M., Evers, S., & Smit, F. (2018) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0206236 · Cited by 14
Personalizing Second-Line Type 2 Diabetes Treatment Selection: Combining Network Meta-analysis, Individualized Risk, and Patient Preferences for Unified Decision Support
Choi, S. E., Berkowitz, S. A., Yudkin, J. S., Naci, H., & Basu, S. (2019) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x19829735 · Cited by 16
The impact of pricing strategy on the costs of oral anti‐cancer drugs
Truong, J., Chan, K., Mai, H., Chambers, A., Sabharwal, M., Trudeau, M., & Cheung, M. C. (2019) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.2269 · Cited by 14
Monitoring Interventions
Webb, T. L., & de Bruin, M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.037 · Cited by 16
An economic evaluation of the NightWatch for children with refractory epilepsy: Insight into the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility
Engelgeer, A., van Westrhenen, A., Thijs, R. D., & Evers, S. (2022) · Seizure · doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2022.08.003 · Cited by 13
A cost-utility analysis of multimodal pain rehabilitation in primary healthcare
Eklund, K., Stålnacke, B., Stenberg, G., Enthoven, P., Gerdle, B. U. C., & Sahlèn, K.-G. (2020) · Scandinavian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1515/sjpain-2020-0050 · Cited by 13
“The economic evaluation is described according to the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement [46].”
Method
Nutrient Dense, Low-Cost Foods Can Improve the Affordability and Quality of the New Zealand Diet—A Substitution Modeling Study
Starck, C. S., Blumfield, M., Keighley, T., Marshall, S., Petocz, P., Eroglu, E. I., Abbott, K. A., Cassettari, T., Ali, A., Wham, C. A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph18157950 · Cited by 17
“Data Availability Statement: Information about and access to publicly available NZ nutrition survey data for both adults and children can be sourced here: https://www.health.govt.nz/nz-healthstatistics/national-collections-and-surveys/surveys/past-surveys/nutrition-survey (accessed on 25 October 2020) [6,25]; access t…”
MethodInfluential
Economic Evaluation of Long-Term Survivorship Care for Cancer Patients in OECD Countries: A Systematic Review for Decision-Makers
Brain, D., & Jadambaa, A. (2021) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph182111558 · Cited by 12
“The quality of each study was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement [16].”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Clinical Efficacy and Cost-Effectiveness of Imagery Rescripting Only Compared to Imagery Rescripting and Schema Therapy in Adult Patients With PTSD and Comorbid Cluster C Personality Disorder: Study Design of a Randomized Controlled Trial
van den End, A., Dekker, J., Beekman, A. T. F., Aarts, I., Snoek, A., Blankers, M., Vriend, C., van den Heuvel, O. A., & Thomaes, K. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2021.633614 · Cited by 16
“Economic Evaluation Economic evaluation (including a cost-effectiveness and costutility analysis) will be performed taking in account the CHEERS statement (126) and the 2015 ISPOR (127) guidelines on cost-effectiveness analysis for clinical trials.”
Method
The cost‐effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa in the Australian context
Le, L. K., Hay, P., Wade, T. D., Touyz, S. W., & Mihalopoulos, C. (2017) · International Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1002/eat.22790 · Cited by 13
“This study also adheres to the guidelines in Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) (Husereau et al., 2013).”
Method
Research Pearls: Checklists and Flowcharts to Improve Research Quality
Brand, J. C., Hardy, R. H., & Monroe, E. J. (2020) · Arthroscopy The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2020.02.046 · Cited by 12
Critical and Qualitative Approaches to Behavior Change
Chamberlain, K., & Lyons, A. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.030 · Cited by 13
Cost-effectiveness of Microsoft Academic Graph with machine learning for automated study identification in a living map of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) research
Shemilt, I., Arno, A., Thomas, J., Lorenc, T., Khouja, C., Raine, G., Sutcliffe, K., D’Souza, P., Kwan, I., Wright, K. E., et al. (2021) · Wellcome Open Research · doi:10.12688/wellcomeopenres.17141.1 · Cited by 14
“This cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is reported in line with consolidated reporting standards for economic evaluations 9 .”
Maximizing User Engagement with Behavior Change Interventions
Yardley, L., Morrison, L. G., Müller, I., & Bradbury, K. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.025 · Cited by 11
Cost-effectiveness analysis of axitinib through a probabilistic decision model
Petrou, P. (2015) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656566.2015.1039982 · Cited by 11
An introduction to the methods of decision‐analytic modelling used in economic evaluations for Dermatologists
McManus, E., Sach, T., & Levell, N. J. (2019) · Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology · doi:10.1111/jdv.15713 · Cited by 11
Cost-effectiveness of coronary artery bypass graft and percutaneous coronary intervention compared to medical therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review
Gholami, S. S., Azar, F. E. F., Rezapour, A., & Tajdini, M. (2019) · Heart Failure Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10741-019-09811-3 · Cited by 11
Prophylactic cranial irradiation in non-small cell lung cancer: evidence and future development
Chałubińska‐Fendler, J., & Kępka, L. (2021) · Journal of Thoracic Disease · doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.11.36 · Cited by 10
“Those analyses should be standardized by appropriate reporting (39).”
Background
A cost‐utility analysis comparing CT surveillance, PET‐CT surveillance, and planned postradiation neck dissection for advanced nodal HPV‐positive oropharyngeal cancer
Fu, T. S., Scheffler, P., Forner, D. W. A., Noel, C. W., Huang, S. H., Gilbert, R. W., Goldstein, D. P., O’Sullivan, B., Mehanna, H. M., Waldron, J. N., et al. (2021) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.33653 · Cited by 11
“This article was prepared in accordance with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research guidelines using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist.(9,10)”
Method
Comprehensive cost-effectiveness of diabetes management for the underserved in the United States: A systematic review
Bosetti, R., Tabatabai, L. S., Naufal, G., Menser, T. L., & Kash, B. A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0260139 · Cited by 16
“Three studies [33, 36, 37] used no control group, but two of these studies performed a longitudinal pre-post analysis, assessing the cost-effectiveness before and after CHEERS Item Study does not report (n/14,”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Economic evaluations of physical rehabilitation interventions in older adults with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review
Shahabi, S., Rezapour, A., & Arabloo, J. (2019) · European Journal of Physiotherapy · doi:10.1080/21679169.2019.1672785 · Cited by 11
“Abbreviations: OA: Osteoarthritis; PRISMA: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses; PICO: The Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcome; CHEERS: Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards;; RCT: Randomized Controlled Trial; CEA: Costeffective analysis; QALYs: Quality-…”
MethodInfluential
Cost-effectiveness analysis of mitral valve repair with the MitraClip delivery system for patients with mitral regurgitation: a systematic review
Rezapour, A., Azari, S., Arabloo, J., Pourasghari, H., Behzadifar, M., Alipour, V., Omidi, N., Sadeghian, S., Aghajani, H., & Bragazzi, N. L. (2020) · Heart Failure Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10741-020-10055-9 · Cited by 11
Economic evaluation of laboratory diagnostic test types in Covid-19 epidemic: A systematic review
Dolatshahi, Z., Nargesi, S., Sadeghifar, J., Mezginejad, F., Jafari, A., Bazyar, M., Ghafourian, S., & Saniee, N. (2022) · International Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106820 · Cited by 11
Economic Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation vs Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Labor Cost Model
Ablordeppey, E., Koenig, A., Barker, A. R., Hernandez, E., Simkovich, S. M., Krings, J. G., Brown, D. S., & Griffey, R. T. (2022) · Western Journal of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.5811/westjem.2022.7.56501 · Cited by 12
“1 29 min [1-269] CXR ordered Radiology read complete 46.”
Background
Review of Research Reporting Guidelines for Radiology Researchers
Cronin, P., & Rawson, J. V. (2016) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2016.01.004 · Cited by 12
A cost comparison study to review community versus acute hospital models of nursing care delivered to oncology patients
O’Mahony, C., Murphy, K. D., O’Brien, G. L., Aherne, J., Hanan, T., Mullen, L., Keane, M., Donnellan, P. P., Davey, C., Browne, H. E., et al. (2020) · European Journal of Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2020.101842 · Cited by 11
Using health economic modelling to inform the design and development of an intervention: estimating the justifiable cost of weight loss maintenance in the UK
Bates, S. E., Thomas, C., Islam, N., Ahern, A. L., Breeze, P. R., Griffin, S. J., & Brennan, A. (2022) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-022-12737-5 · Cited by 10
“Methods The reporting of this study followed the 2013 Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards guidelines [13].”
Method
TIDieR-WASH: A Guideline for Reporting Implementation of Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Interventions
Crocker, J., Ogutu, E. A., Snyder, J. S., Kome, A., Tidwell, B., Rosenboom, J. W., Shapiro, J., Mahongo, J. S., Alexander, K., Gnilo, M., et al. (2024) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp14780 · Cited by 10
Effects of basic endoscopic handling and care training on gastrointestinal endoscopy logistics
Mahawongkajit, P., Techagumpuch, A., & Auksornchat, K. (2022) · Endoscopy International Open · doi:10.1055/a-1630-6403 · Cited by 10
Cost of community-based human papillomavirus self-sampling in Peru: A micro-costing study
Shin, M., Garcia, P. J., Saldarriaga, E. M., Fiestas, J. L., Ásbjörnsdóttir, K., Iribarren, S., Barnabas, R. V., & Gimbel, S. (2021) · The Lancet Regional Health - Americas · doi:10.1016/j.lana.2021.100160 · Cited by 11
Economic evaluation of the Communicating Healthy Beginnings Advice by Telephone trial for early childhood obesity prevention
Killedar, A., Wen, L. M., Tan, E. J., Marshall, S. K., Taki, S., Buchanan, L., Rissel, C. E., Xu, H., Baur, L. A., & Hayes, A. (2022) · Obesity · doi:10.1002/oby.23547 · Cited by 10
“At 24 months, child height and weight were measured, and mothers were asked questions about their child’s health care use and about any time they or a family member missed work or their usual activities because of their child’s illness (online Supporting Information).”
Method
Modelling the health and economic impact of sugary sweetened beverage tax in Canada
Liu, S., Veugelers, P. J., Maximova, K., & Ohinmaa, A. E. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277306 · Cited by 10
“The CHEERS Checklist is shown in the S1 Table in S1 File.”
Method
The "ComPAS Trial" combined treatment model for acute malnutrition: study protocol for the economic evaluation
Lelijveld, N., Bailey, J., Mayberry, A., Trenouth, L., N’Diaye, D. S., Haghparast‐Bidgoli, H., & Puett, C. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2594-7 · Cited by 10
“Results will be reported following the consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) checklist [25].”
Can You Repeat That? Exploring the Definition of a Successful Model Replication in Health Economics
McManus, E., Turner, D., & Sach, T. (2019) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-019-00836-y · Cited by 10
“Whilst calls for transparency are numerous, there is, however, little in the existing literature that evaluates how well these calls are being met, and most commonly, transparency is checked via the use of checklists, originally intended to ensure reporting thoroughness [32, 33].”
BackgroundMethod
The Science of Behavior Change: The Road Ahead
Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. E., & Lintunen, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.046 · Cited by 13
Decreased costs and retained QoL due to the ‘PACE Steps to Success’ intervention in LTCFs: cost-effectiveness analysis of a randomized controlled trial
Wichmann, A. B., Adang, E., Vissers, K. C. P., Szczerbińska, K. E., Kylänen, M., Payne, S. A., Gambassi, G., Onwuteaka-Philipsen, B. D., Smets, T., den Block, L. V., et al. (2020) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-020-01720-9 · Cited by 10

Authors: Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., Loder, E., & on behalf of the CHEERS Task Force
Affiliations: Institute of Health Economics (CA)
University of York (GB)
University of Warwick (GB)
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
University of Glasgow (GB)
RTI Health Solutions (US)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author: Husereau, Don
ORCID: Husereau, Don
Drummond, Michael
Petrou, Stavros
Carswell, Chris
Moher, David
Greenberg, Dan
Augustovski, Federico
Briggs, Andrew H
Mauskopf, Josephine
Loder, Elizabeth
Venue: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published: 2013
Volume: 11
Issue: 1
Pages: 6
ISSN: 1478-7547 (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.1186/1478-7547-11-6
PMC: PMC3607888
OpenAlex: W3044545425
Cited by: 381
References: 25
Citations by year: 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
FWCI: 18.60
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: gold
doi.org
Licence: cc-by
Locations: Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics: Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
Keywords: reporting guidelines, health economic evaluation, checklists, Delphi consensus, peer review, medical journal editors, ISPOR, health decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Figures

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Self-check

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks