The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement
Open accessAbstract
Economic evaluations of health interventions pose a particular challenge for reporting. There is also a need to consolidate and update existing guidelines and promote their use in a user friendly manner. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement is an attempt to consolidate and update previous health economic evaluation guidelines efforts into one current, useful reporting guidance. The primary audiences for the CHEERS statement are researchers reporting economic evaluations and the editors and peer reviewers assessing them for publication.The need for new reporting guidance was identified by a survey of medical editors. A list of possible items based on a systematic review was created. A two round, modified Delphi panel consisting of representatives from academia, clinical practice, industry, government, and the editorial community was conducted. Out of 44 candidate items, 24 items and accompanying recommendations were developed. The recommendations are contained in a user friendly, 24 item checklist. A copy of the statement, accompanying checklist, and this report can be found on the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluations Publication Guidelines Task Force website (http://www.ispor.org/TaskForces/EconomicPubGuidelines.asp).We hope CHEERS will lead to better reporting, and ultimately, better health decisions. To facilitate dissemination and uptake, the CHEERS statement is being co-published across 10 health economics and medical journals. We encourage other journals and groups, to endorse CHEERS. The author team plans to review the checklist for an update in five years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Figures
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“we would argue that the QHES used here is based on Drummond’s guidelines (used in prior reviews) and is designed to cover the same topics, but offers a simpler, quantifiable format that is easier to apply. [32]”
From Use of health economic evaluation in the implementation and improvement science fields—a systematic literature review (2019) · cites this paper as [32]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Self-citationCost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
(1996) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195108248.001.0001 · Cited by 7,193
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., & Loder, E. (2013) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002 · Cited by 1,998
Self-citationGuidelines for authors and peer reviewers of economic submissions to the BMJ
Drummond, M. F., & Jefferson, T. O. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.313.7052.275 · Cited by 1,827
Self-citationGuidance for Developers of Health Research Reporting Guidelines
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., Simera, I., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000217 · Cited by 1,437
Self-citationRecommendations for Reporting Cost-effectiveness Analyses
Siegel, J. E. (1996) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540160061034 · Cited by 1,147
Siegel, J. E. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.276.16.1339 · Cited by 1,040
Ramsey, S. D., Willke, R. J., Briggs, A. H., Brown, R. E., Buxton, M. J., Chawla, A., Cook, J. R., Glick, H. A., Liljas, B., Petitti, D. B., et al. (2005) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.00045.x · Cited by 720
Self-citationTurner, L., Shamseer, L., Altman, D. G., Schulz, K. F., & Moher, D. (2012) · Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-60 · Cited by 628
Self-citationDrummond, M., Schwartz, J. S., Jönsson, B., Luce, B. R., Neumann, P. J., Siebert, U., & Sullivan, S. D. (2008) · International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care · doi:10.1017/s0266462308080343 · Cited by 489
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Augustovski, F., de Bekker-Grob, E., Briggs, A. H., Carswell, C., Caulley, L., Chaiyakunapruk, N., Greenberg, D., Loder, E., et al. (2022) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2021.10.008 · Cited by 847
Self-citationCore outcome measurement instruments for clinical trials in nonspecific low back pain
Chiarotto, A., Boers, M., Deyo, R. A., Buchbinder, R., Corbin, T. P., Costa, L. O. P., Foster, N. E., Grotle, M., Koes, B. W., Kovacs, F. M., et al. (2018) · Pain · doi:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001117 · Cited by 461
Determining if Telehealth Can Reduce Health System Costs: Scoping Review
Snoswell, C. L., Taylor, M. L., Comans, T. A., Smith, A. C., Gray, L., & Caffery, L. J. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/17298 · Cited by 469
“Reason for lower cost in the telehealth group Initial investment in US $ 2019 Findings in US $ 2019CHEERSa score (out of 20) Telehealth modality and clinical focus Reference Saved patient transport costs; saved working hours $199,959.03 including equipment and implementation costs Cost per examination for telehealth w…”
MethodInfluentialThe Handbook of Behavior Change
Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. E., & Lintunen, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318 · Cited by 446
Economic evaluations of Internet interventions for mental health: a systematic review
Donker, T., Blankers, M., Hedman, E., Ljótsson, B., Petrie, K., & Christensen, H. (2015) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291715001427 · Cited by 316
“The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist (Husereau et al. 2013) is a newly developed checklist which aims better reporting of economic evaluations, and ultimately to better health decisions.”
BackgroundMethodChanging Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior
Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.002 · Cited by 346
Xie, Y., Nguyen, Q. D., Hamzah, H., Lim, G., Bellemo, V., Gunasekeran, D. V., Yip, M. Y. T., Qi Lee, X., Hsu, W., Li Lee, M., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30060-1 · Cited by 288
Cost and effects of integrated care: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Rocks, S., Berntson, D., Gil-Salmerón, A., Kadu, M., Ehrenberg, N., Stein, V. K., & Tsiachristas, A. (2020) · The European Journal of Health Economics · doi:10.1007/s10198-020-01217-5 · Cited by 247
Economic impact of medication error: a systematic review
Walsh, E. K., Hansen, C. R., Sahm, L. J., Kearney, P. M., Doherty, E., & Bradley, C. (2017) · Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety · doi:10.1002/pds.4188 · Cited by 164
Roberts, S. L. E., Healey, A., & Sevdalis, N. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-019-0901-7 · Cited by 161
Cost-effectiveness of Store-and-Forward Teledermatology: A Systematic Review
Snoswell, C., Finnane, A., Janda, M., Soyer, H. P., & Whitty, J. A. (2016) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2016.0525 · Cited by 140
Changing Behavior Using the Model of Action Phases
Keller, L., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2020) · The Handbook of Behavior Change · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.006 · Cited by 147
Mixed-method approaches to strengthen economic evaluations in implementation research
Dopp, A. R., Mundey, P., Beasley, L. O., Silovsky, J. F., & Eisenberg, D. (2019) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0850-6 · Cited by 118
“Table 2 describes the study using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards [31], and includes information about how mixed methods informed each item of the evaluation.”
MethodInfluentialMangham‐Jefferies, L., Pitt, C., Cousens, S. N., MILLS, A. J., & Schellenberg, J. (2014) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/1471-2393-14-243 · Cited by 133
Winkley, K., Upsher, R. J., Stahl, D. R., Pollard, D. J., Kasera, A., Brennan, A., Heller, S. R., & Ismail, K. (2020) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta24280 · Cited by 156
Jin, Y., Sanger, N., Shams, I., Luo, C., Shahid, H., Li, G., Bhatt, M., Zielinski, L., Bantoto, B., Wang, M., et al. (2018) · Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare · doi:10.2147/jmdh.s155103 · Cited by 134
Jardim, T. V., Mozaffarian, D., Abrahams‐Gessel, S., Sy, S., Lee, Y., Liu, J., Huang, Y., Rehm, C. D., Wilde, P., Micha, R., et al. (2019) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002981 · Cited by 132
Creswell, C., Violato, M., Fairbanks, H., White, E., Parkinson, M., Abitabile, G., Leidi, A., & Cooper, P. J. (2017) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30149-9 · Cited by 126
Direct, indirect and intangible costs of acute hand and wrist injuries: A systematic review
Robinson, L., Sarkies, M., Brown, T., & O’Brien, L. (2016) · Injury · doi:10.1016/j.injury.2016.09.041 · Cited by 115
de Graaff, A. M., Cuijpers, P., McDaid, D., Park, A., Woodward, A., Bryant, R. A., Fuhr, D. C., Kieft, B., Minkenberg, E., & Sijbrandij, M. (2020) · Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences · doi:10.1017/s2045796020000724 · Cited by 109
Changing Behavior Using the Health Action Process Approach
Schwarzer, R., & Hamilton, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.007 · Cited by 114
Ananthapavan, J., Sacks, G., Brown, V., Moodie, M., Nguyen, P. K., Veerman, L. J., Herrera, A. M. M., Lal, A., Peeters, A., & Carter, R. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0234804 · Cited by 111
“The key reporting items based on the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist [39] are reported in S1 Table.”
MethodImpact of physical activity on healthcare costs: a systematic review
Duijvestijn, M., de Wit, G. A., van Gils, P. F., & Wendel‐Vos, W. (2023) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-023-09556-8 · Cited by 96
“Quality assessment The quality of studies was assessed with the “Checklist for reporting estimates of the economic costs/burden of risk factors” based on the “Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards” (CHEERS) [21].”
MethodInfluentialThe Estimates of the Health and Economic Burden of Dengue in Vietnam
Hung, T. M., Clapham, H., Bettis, A. A., Cuong, H. Q., Thwaites, G. E., Wills, B. A., Boni, M. F., & Turner, H. C. (2018) · Trends in Parasitology · doi:10.1016/j.pt.2018.07.007 · Cited by 70
“Moving forward it would be beneficial if studies were to adhere to standardized guidelines (such as CHEERS [60]) regarding what should be reported within the manuscript.”
BackgroundBasu, S., Wagner, R. G., Sewpaul, R., Reddy, P., & Davies, J. (2019) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30450-9 · Cited by 69
Gardner, B., Rebar, A. L., & Lally, P. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.041 · Cited by 73
Bowser, D. M., Henry, B. F., & McCollister, K. E. (2021) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-021-01094-3 · Cited by 61
Hong, D., Si, L., Jiang, M., Shao, H., Ming, W., Zhao, Y., Li, Y., & Shi, L. (2019) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-019-00774-9 · Cited by 65
The economic impact of pressure ulcers among patients in intensive care units. A systematic review
McEvoy, N. L., Avşar, P., Patton, D., Curley, G. F., Kearney, C. J., & Moore, Z. E. H. (2020) · Journal of Tissue Viability · doi:10.1016/j.jtv.2020.12.004 · Cited by 63
Changing Behavior Using Social Cognitive Theory
Łuszczyńska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.003 · Cited by 81
Sniehotta, F. F., Evans, E. H., Sainsbury, K., Adamson, A., Batterham, A. M., Becker, F., Brown, H., Dombrowski, S. U., Jackson, D., Howel, D., et al. (2019) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002793 · Cited by 58
“The within-trial analysis was conducted according to the rigorous and explicit standards expected of best practice methods [46].”
Lopatina, E., Donald, F., DiCenso, A., Martin‐Misener, R., Kilpatrick, K., Bryant‐Lukosius, D., Carter, N., Reid, K. J., & Marshall, D. A. (2017) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.04.012 · Cited by 53
Warner, L. M., & French, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.032 · Cited by 62
Thành, N. X., Nelson, A. L., Wang, X., Faris, P., Wasylak, T., Gramlich, L. M., & Nelson, G. S. (2020) · Canadian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1503/cjs.006720 · Cited by 53
Ciani, O., Grigore, B., Blommestein, H. M., de Groot, S., Möllenkamp, M., Rabbe, S., Daubner‐Bendes, R., & Taylor, R. S. (2021) · Medical Decision Making · doi:10.1177/0272989x21994553 · Cited by 52
“We developed a structured extraction form for included HTA reports based on the above framework, previous studies,(21) and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist.(22) We considered the following categories of information: general characteristics of the evaluation/report, cha…”
MethodChanging Behavior Using Ecological Models
Salmon, J., Hesketh, K. D., Arundell, L., Downing, K. L., & Biddle, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.017 · Cited by 57
A systematic review of economic evaluations of treatments for patients with epilepsy
Wijnen, B. F. M., van Mastrigt, G. A. P. G., Evers, S., Gershuni, O., Lambrechts, D. A. J. E., Majoie, M., Postulart, D., Aldenkamp, A. P., & de Kinderen, R. J. A. (2017) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.13655 · Cited by 49
“To determine the quality of reporting of the included studies, the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement was used.(12) To limit the possibility of biased results, two reviewers independently reviewed both the data extraction form and the quality appraisal of the included studie…”
MethodAguiar, M., Andronis, L., Pallan, M. J., Högler, W., & Frew, E. J. (2019) · European Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1038/s41430-019-0486-x · Cited by 49
“Pro 2016 software, and followed modelling [28, 30] and reporting [31] guidelines for good practice.”
MethodBezeczky, Z., El-Banna, A., Petrou, S., Kemp, A., Scourfield, J., Forrester, D., & Nurmatov, U. B. (2020) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104394 · Cited by 49
Self-citationChen, Y., Khashab, M. A., Adam, V., Bai, G., Singh, V. K., Bukhari, M. A., Gutierrez, O. I. B., Elmunzer, B. J., Moran, R., Fayad, L., et al. (2018) · Endoscopy International Open · doi:10.1055/a-0611-5082 · Cited by 47
“The reporting of our results follows the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards Statement [28].”
Onuoha, E. N., Leff, J. A., Schackman, B. R., McCollister, K. E., Polsky, D. E., & Murphy, S. M. (2021) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2020.12.023 · Cited by 47
Stathi, A., Withall, J., Greaves, C. J., Thompson, J. L., Taylor, G. T., Medina‐Lara, A., Green, C., Bilzon, J., Gray, S. F., Johansen‐Berg, H., et al. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2603-x · Cited by 47
“Findings will be reported in keeping with the CHEERS guidelines for cost-effectiveness studies [32].”
MethodColbourn, T., Pulkki‐Brännström, A., Nambiar, B., Kim, S.-W., Bondo, A., Banda, L., Makwenda, C., Batura, N., Haghparast‐Bidgoli, H., Hunter, R. M., et al. (2015) · Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation · doi:10.1186/s12962-014-0028-2 · Cited by 45
“Our reporting conforms to the CHEERS statement [13].”
DEEP Study: Indirect and Out-of-pocket Costs of Persistent Orofacial Pain
Breckons, M., Shen, J., Bunga, J. J., Vale, L. D., & Durham, J. (2018) · Journal of Dental Research · doi:10.1177/0022034518773310 · Cited by 45
“2014) and the relevant points of the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist (Husereau et al. 2013).”
BackgroundMethodBosco, A., Schneider, J. M., & Broome, E. (2019) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2019.02.005 · Cited by 45
Finkelstein, E. A., Bilger, M., & Baid, D. (2019) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.05.018 · Cited by 49
“Researchers should also systematically report on the cost-effectiveness of incentives as they would for other health interventions using best practices (Husereau et al., 2013) as a lack of evidence for cost-effectiveness will make even effective interventions difficult to justify to policymakers.”
BackgroundChanging Behavior Using Self-Determination Theory
Hagger, M. S., Hankonen, N. E., Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.008 · Cited by 67
Snoek, A., Beekman, A. T. F., Dekker, J., Aarts, I., van Grootheest, G., Blankers, M., Vriend, C., van den Heuvel, O., & Thomaes, K. (2020) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-020-02713-x · Cited by 44
“We will take into account the CHEERS statement [92] and the 2015 ISPOR good research practices task force report on cost-effectiveness analysis alongside clinical trials [93].”
Rodgers, H., Bosomworth, H. J., Krebs, H. I., van Wijck, F., Howel, D., Wilson, N., Finch, T. L., Alvarado, N., Ternent, L., Fernandez-García, C., et al. (2020) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta24540 · Cited by 51
Nguyen, P. K., Le, L. K., Ananthapavan, J., Gao, L., Dunstan, D. W., & Moodie, M. (2022) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.106964 · Cited by 53
Batchelor, J., Millington, A., Thomas, K. S., Akram, P., Azad, J., Bewley, A., Chalmers, J. R., Cheung, S. T., Duley, L., Eleftheriadou, V., et al. (2020) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta24640 · Cited by 44
“Female 76 (64) 22 (41) 56 (46) 25 (54) 53 (41) 17 (36) continued D O I: 1 0 .”
BackgroundInfluentialJahangiri, R., Rezapour, A., Malekzadeh, R., Olyaeemanesh, A., Roshandel, G., & Motevalian, S. A. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0271908 · Cited by 43
“Quality assessment The quality of reporting in each included research was assessed using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement checklist [33].”
MethodCost-effectiveness analysis of PCSK9 inhibitors in cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review
Azari, S., Rezapour, A., Omidi, N., Alipour, V., Behzadifar, M., Safari, H., Tajdini, M., & Bragazzi, N. L. (2019) · Heart Failure Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10741-019-09874-2 · Cited by 39
Planning and Implementation Intention Interventions
Rhodes, R. E., Grant, S. J., & de Bruijn, G. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.039 · Cited by 46
Attitudes and Persuasive Communication Interventions
Hamilton, K., & Johnson, B. T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.031 · Cited by 44
Changing Behavior Using Habit Theory
Orbell, S., & Verplanken, B. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.013 · Cited by 50
Cost of interventions to control schistosomiasis: A systematic review of the literature
Salari, P., Fürst, T., Knopp, S., Utzinger, J., & Tediosi, F. (2020) · PLoS neglected tropical diseases · doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0008098 · Cited by 38
Changing Behavior: A Theory- and Evidence-Based Approach
Hagger, M. S., Cameron, L. D., Hamilton, K., Hankonen, N. E., & Lintunen, T. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.001 · Cited by 47
Cronin, J., Murphy, A., & Savage, E. (2017) · Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) · doi:10.1007/s11845-017-1600-5 · Cited by 40
“As none of the studies included in this review are from an Irish healthcare setting, we applied the EUnetHTA transferability tool questions 27–29 to assess the transferability of study results for the economic evaluations to the Irish system as recommended by HIQA [15].”
InfluentialBrown, V., Tan, E. J., Hayes, A. J., Petrou, S., & Moodie, M. (2018) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/obr.12672 · Cited by 37
“in the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist (39).”
MethodSelf-citationTarrant, M., Haslam, C., Carter, M., Calitri, R., & Haslam, S. A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.044 · Cited by 38
Liu, R., Oluwole, O. O., Diakite, I., Botteman, M. F., Snider, J. T., & Locke, F. L. (2021) · Journal of Medical Economics · doi:10.1080/13696998.2021.1901721 · Cited by 37
Duevel, J. A., Hasemann, L., Peña-Longobardo, L. M., Rodríguez-Sánchez, B., Aranda-Reneo, I., Oliva-Moreno, J., López-Bastida, J., & Greiner, W. (2020) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-020-00288-7 · Cited by 34
Littlewood, E., Ali, S., Dyson, L., Keding, A., Ansell, P., Bailey, D., Bates, D., Baxter, C., Beresford‐Dent, J., Clarke, A., et al. (2018) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr06060 · Cited by 43
Wen, H., Hockenberry, J. M., & Pollack, H. A. (2018) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2943 · Cited by 37
Jacobsen, E., Boyers, D., & Avenell, A. (2020) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-019-00878-2 · Cited by 35
“It is also concerning that many SREEs claim to have conducted QA, but further reading identifies that in fact reporting standards such as the CHEERS (Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards) statement were used instead [22].”
MethodChanging Behavior Using Integrated Theories
Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.015 · Cited by 44
What do cost-effective health behaviour-change interventions contain? A comparison of six domains
Beard, E., West, R., Lorencatto, F., Gardner, B., Michie, S., Owens, L., & Shahab, L. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213983 · Cited by 32
Trevillion, K., Ryan, E., Pickles, A. R., Heslin, M., Byford, S., Nath, S., Bick, D., Milgrom, J., Mycroft, R. H., Domoney, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2019.10.013 · Cited by 39
“, 2014) and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist (Husereau et al., 2013) have been completed (see Supplementary Tables 1–3).”
BackgroundZhang, Y., Carter, H. E., Lazzarini, P. A., Cramb, S. M., Pacella, R., van Netten, J. J., Cheng, Q., Derhy, P. H., Kinnear, E. M., & McPhail, S. (2022) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/dme.14961 · Cited by 32
Changing Behavior Using the Transtheoretical Model
DiClemente, C. C., & Graydon, M. M. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.010 · Cited by 35
Economic benefits of pharmacy technicians practicing at advanced scope: A systematic review
Banks, V., Barras, M. A., & Snoswell, C. L. (2020) · Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · doi:10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.01.007 · Cited by 31
Adobor, R. D., Joranger, P., Steen, H., Ståle Navrud, A., & Brox, J. I. (2014) · Scoliosis · doi:10.1186/s13013-014-0021-8 · Cited by 31
“None of the studies cited in these reviews, however, applied recommended health economic evaluation principles [32].”
Khan, K., Mazuquin, B., Canaway, A., Petrou, S., & Bruce, J. (2019) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-019-05235-7 · Cited by 33
Self-citationAllocating healthcare resources to genomic testing in Canada: latest evidence and current challenges
Weymann, D., Dragojlovic, N., Pollard, S., & Regier, D. A. (2019) · Journal of Community Genetics · doi:10.1007/s12687-019-00428-5 · Cited by 30
Creswell, C., Violato, M., Cruddace, S., Gerry, S., Murray, L., Shafran, R., Stein, A. L., Willetts, L., McIntosh, E., & Cooper, P. (2019) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.13089 · Cited by 28
“Current best-practice methods were adhered to for conducting and reporting economic evaluations alongside trials (Drummond, Sculpher, Claxton, Stoddart, & Torrance, 2015; Husereau et al., 2013; NICE, 2013; Petrou & Gray, 2011).”
MethodChanging Behavior Using the Health Belief Model and Protection Motivation Theory
Orbell, S., Zahid, H., & Henderson, C. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.004 · Cited by 35
Fraser, H., Gallacher, D., Achana, F. A., Court, R. A., Taylor‐Phillips, S., Nduka, C. U., Stinton, C., Willans, R. M., Gill, P. S., & Mistry, H. (2020) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta24310 · Cited by 29
Zaidat, O. O., Ribó, M., Mattle, H. P., Saver, J. L., Bozorgchami, H., Yoo, A. J., Ehm, A., Kottenmeier, E., Cameron, H. L., Qadeer, R. A., et al. (2020) · Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery · doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016930 · Cited by 29
A systematic review of economic evaluations for donor human milk versus standard feeding in infants
Zanganeh, M., Jordan, M., & Mistry, H. (2021) · Maternal and Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.13151 · Cited by 29
“The quality of both the trial-based and model-based economic evaluations was assessed using the CHEERS checklist (Husereau et al., 2013)—a 26-item instrument with a total of six domains.”
InfluentialO'Brien, G. L., O'Mahony, C., Cooke, K., Kinneally, A., Sinnott, S.-J., Walshe, V., Mulcahy, M., & Byrne, S. (2019) · Clinical Breast Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.clbc.2019.01.011 · Cited by 29
Changing Behavior by Changing Environments
Marteau, T. M., Fletcher, P. C., Hollands, G. J., & Munafo, M. R. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.014 · Cited by 32
Antonini, A., Gentile, G., Giglio, M., Marcante, A., Gage, H., Touray, M., Fotiadis, D. I., Gatsios, D. A., Konitsiotis, S., Timotijević, L., et al. (2018) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-018-2767-4 · Cited by 27
“Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, Carswell C, Moher D, Greenberg D, Augustovski F, Briggs AH, Mauskopf J, Loder E. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement.”
MethodDeFelice, N., Birger, R., DeFelice, N., Gagner, A., Campbell, S. R., Romano, C., Santoriello, M. P., Henke, J., Wittie, J., Cole, B., et al. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.3175 · Cited by 27
Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Behavior Change Interventions: A Ten-Task Guide
Abraham, C., & Denford, S. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.019 · Cited by 27
Changing Behavior Using the Reflective-Impulsive Model
Deutsch, R., & Strack, F. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.012 · Cited by 30
Mori, A. T., Binyaruka, P., Hangoma, P., Robberstad, B., & Sandøy, I. F. (2020) · Health Economics Review · doi:10.1186/s13561-020-00283-y · Cited by 26
“[12], and the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) [13].”
The Cost of Neurodevelopmental Disability: Scoping Review of Economic Evaluation Methods
Kularatna, S., Jadambaa, A., Senanayake, S. J., Brain, D., Hawker, N., Kasparian, N. A., Abell, B., Auld, B. C., Eagleson, K. J., Justo, R. N., et al. (2022) · ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research · doi:10.2147/ceor.s370311 · Cited by 26
Salisbury, C., Man, M., Chaplin, K., Mann, C., Bower, P., Brookes, S. T., Duncan, P., Fitzpatrick, B., Gardner, C., Gaunt, D., et al. (2019) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr07050 · Cited by 26
Davies, M. J., Kristunas, C., Alshreef, A., Dixon, S., Eborall, H., Glab, A., Huddlestone, L., Hudson, N., Khunti, K., Martin, G. P., et al. (2019) · BMC Family Practice · doi:10.1186/s12875-019-1038-0 · Cited by 26
Gwernan‐Jones, R., Lourida, I., Abbott, R. A., Rogers, M., Green, C., Ball, S., Hemsley, A. G., Cheeseman, D., Clare, L., Moore, D. A., et al. (2020) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr08430 · Cited by 25
Effectiveness of hospital payment reforms in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
Ghazaryan, E., Delarmente, B. A., Garber, K. D., Gross, M., Sriudomporn, S., & Rao, K. D. (2021) · Health Policy and Planning · doi:10.1093/heapol/czab050 · Cited by 25
Bramble, M., Wong, A., Carroll, V., Schwebel, D., & Rossiter, R. C. (2021) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14920 · Cited by 25
“While challenging to conduct, economic evaluations in health care are undertaken to inform resource allocation decisions or to evaluate the consequences of a health intervention (Husereau et al., 2013).”
BackgroundMethodAbel, T. J., Remick, M. L., Welch, W. C., & Smith, K. J. (2021) · Epilepsia Open · doi:10.1002/epi4.12570 · Cited by 24
van den Brand, F. A., Nagelhout, G. E., Winkens, B., Chavannes, N. H., van Schayck, O. C. P., & Evers, S. (2019) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.14861 · Cited by 28
Advancing Implementation Science Measurement
Lewis, C. C., & Dorsey, C. N. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-03874-8_9 · Cited by 25
Senanayake, S. J., Graves, N., Healy, H. G., Baboolal, K., & Kularatna, S. (2020) · Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation · doi:10.1186/s12962-020-00213-z · Cited by 26
High-frequency 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Back and Leg Pain
Taylor, R. S., Bentley, A., Campbell, B. K., & Murphy, K. J. (2020) · Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/ajp.0000000000000866 · Cited by 25
Sellars, M., Clayton, J. M., Detering, K. M., Tong, A., Power, D., & Morton, R. L. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217787 · Cited by 26
“Study reporting is based on the consolidated health economic evaluation reporting standards (CHEERS) statement and the completed checklist is reported in Supporting Information File S1 Appendix [17].”
MethodDyadic Behavior Change Interventions
Scholz, U., Berli, C., Lüscher, J., & Knoll, N. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108677318.043 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Husereau, D., Drummond, M., Petrou, S., Carswell, C., Moher, D., Greenberg, D., Augustovski, F., Briggs, A. H., Mauskopf, J., Loder, E., & on behalf of the CHEERS Task Force
- Affiliations
- Institute of Health Economics (CA)
- University of York (GB)
- University of Warwick (GB)
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (CA)
- Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL)
- Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR)
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- RTI Health Solutions (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Husereau, Don
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation
- Published
- 2013
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6
- ISSN
- 1478-7547 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3607888
- OpenAlex
- W3044545425
- Cited by
- 381
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 18.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- uO Research (University of Ottawa) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Keywords
- reporting guidelines, health economic evaluation, checklists, Delphi consensus, peer review, medical journal editors, ISPOR, health decision-making
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
